Miao Mingyuan, Cai Haiqing, Hu Liwei, Wang Zhigang
Department of Orthopedic Surgery Department of Radiology, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jan;96(3):e5902. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005902.
The Tonnis radiographic classification of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) has been widely used. The International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) classification, a new classification system recently developed by the IHDI, is beginning to be applied to evaluate DDH with the absence of an ossification center. This study aimed to validate its reliability in evaluating DDH with an ossification center and compared the 2 classifications in evaluating all DDH hips. In addition, the prediction values of the 2 classifications on clinical management selection were compared.In total, the pelvic radiographs of 212 DDH patients (318 hips) between the ages of 6 and 48 months admitted to Shanghai Children's Medical Center between 2007 and 2014 were assessed by 3 observers retrospectively using the 2 classifications. Intraobserver and interobserver agreements were evaluated using the kappa method. We also assessed the correlation of the 2 radiographic classifications in terms of treatment selection.In total, 216 hips received closed reduction, 61 hips received open reduction, and 41 hips received pelvic osteotomy. Both classifications showed excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability. However, the IHDI demonstrated more interobserver reliability, especially for evaluating DDH without an ossification center. Both classifications were found to be relevant in detecting the DDH treatment type (P < 0.01). The Tonnis classification was also relevant, especially for evaluating DDH with an ossification center.The IHDI classification exhibited good practicability in classifying the radiographic severity of DDH compared to the Tonnis classification, particularly in hips without an ossification center. Like the Tonnis classification, the IHDI classification can predict treatment plans. Therefore, the IHDI classification seems to be the upgraded version of the Tonnis classification.
髋关节发育不良(DDH)的Tonnis影像学分类已被广泛应用。国际髋关节发育不良协会(IHDI)分类是该协会最近开发的一种新分类系统,开始用于评估无骨化中心的DDH。本研究旨在验证其在评估有骨化中心的DDH时的可靠性,并比较这两种分类在评估所有DDH髋关节时的差异。此外,还比较了这两种分类对临床治疗选择的预测价值。
2007年至2014年期间收治于上海儿童医学中心的212例6至48个月大的DDH患者(318个髋关节)的骨盆X光片,由3名观察者采用这两种分类方法进行回顾性评估。采用kappa法评估观察者内和观察者间的一致性。我们还评估了这两种影像学分类在治疗选择方面的相关性。
共有216个髋关节接受了闭合复位,61个髋关节接受了切开复位,41个髋关节接受了骨盆截骨术。两种分类方法在观察者内和观察者间均显示出良好的可靠性。然而,IHDI分类在观察者间的可靠性更高,尤其是在评估无骨化中心的DDH时。两种分类方法在检测DDH治疗类型方面均具有相关性(P<0.01)。Tonnis分类也具有相关性,尤其是在评估有骨化中心的DDH时。
与Tonnis分类相比,IHDI分类在对DDH的影像学严重程度进行分类时表现出良好的实用性,尤其是在无骨化中心的髋关节中。与Tonnis分类一样,IHDI分类也可以预测治疗方案。因此,IHDI分类似乎是Tonnis分类的升级版。