Carlson Nicole S, Corwin Elizabeth J, Lowe Nancy K
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2017 Jan;62(1):29-39. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12579. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
Women who are obese have slower labors than women of normal weight, and show reduced response to interventions designed to speed labor progress like oxytocin augmentation and artificial rupture of membranes. The optimal labor management for these women has not been described.
This retrospective cohort study compared 2 propensity score-matched groups of women (N = 360) who were healthy, nulliparous, spontaneously laboring, and obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m ). Labors were managed by either a certified nurse-midwife (CNM) or an obstetrician at one hospital from 2005 through 2012. Comparisons were made on a range of labor processes and outcomes.
Women who were obese and cared for in labor by CNMs were 87.0% less likely to have operative vaginal birth (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.41) and 76.3% less likely to have third- or fourth-degree perineal lacerations (aOR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13-0.79) compared to a matched group of women who were obese and had similarly sized neonates but who were cared for by obstetricians. The rates of unplanned cesarean birth, postpartum hemorrhage, maternal intrapartum fever, and neonatal intensive care unit admission were similar between groups. CNM patients were significantly less likely than patients of obstetricians to have labor anesthesia, synthetic oxytocin augmentation, or intrauterine pressure catheters. By contrast, CNM patients were significantly more likely than patients of obstetricians to use physiologic labor interventions, including intermittent fetal monitoring, ambulation, and hydrotherapy.
In women with spontaneous labor onset who were healthy, obese, and nulliparous, watchful waiting and use of physiologic labor interventions, characterizing CNM intrapartum care, were associated with outcomes that were similar to, or better than, those of women who were obese and exposed to more high-technology interventions characterizing intrapartum care by obstetricians. In women who were obese, physiologic labor interventions were safe for both mothers and neonates.
肥胖女性的产程比体重正常的女性慢,并且对旨在加速产程进展的干预措施(如缩宫素加强宫缩和人工破膜)反应降低。尚未描述针对这些女性的最佳产程管理方法。
这项回顾性队列研究比较了2组倾向评分匹配的女性(N = 360),她们健康、初产、自然临产且肥胖(体重指数≥30kg/m²)。2005年至2012年期间,在一家医院,产程由一名认证护士助产士(CNM)或一名产科医生管理。对一系列产程过程和结局进行了比较。
与一组肥胖且新生儿大小相似但由产科医生护理的匹配女性相比,肥胖且在产程中由CNM护理的女性进行阴道助产的可能性降低87.0%(调整比值比[aOR],0.15;95%置信区间[CI],0.06 - 0.41),发生会阴三度或四度裂伤的可能性降低76.3%(aOR,0.31;95%CI,0.13 - 0.79)。两组间计划外剖宫产、产后出血、产妇产时发热和新生儿重症监护病房入院率相似。CNM护理的患者比产科医生护理的患者进行分娩麻醉、使用合成缩宫素加强宫缩或使用宫内压力导管的可能性显著降低。相比之下,CNM护理的患者比产科医生护理的患者更有可能使用生理性产程干预措施,包括间歇性胎儿监护、走动和水疗法。
在自然临产、健康、肥胖且初产的女性中,以CNM产时护理为特征的密切观察等待和使用生理性产程干预措施,与肥胖且接受更多以产科医生产时护理为特征的高科技干预措施的女性的结局相似或更好。在肥胖女性中,生理性产程干预措施对母亲和新生儿都是安全的。