Suppr超能文献

一项随机试验评估了门静脉压力指导治疗预防静脉曲张再出血是否能改善肝硬化患者的生存率。

A randomized trial to assess whether portal pressure guided therapy to prevent variceal rebleeding improves survival in cirrhosis.

机构信息

Gastrointestinal Bleeding Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Autonomous University, Barcelona, Spain.

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Lleida, Spain.

出版信息

Hepatology. 2017 May;65(5):1693-1707. doi: 10.1002/hep.29056. Epub 2017 Mar 30.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Monitoring the hemodynamic response of portal pressure (PP) to drug therapy accurately stratifies the risk of variceal rebleeding (VRB). We assessed whether guiding therapy with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) monitoring may improve survival by preventing VRB. Patients with cirrhosis with controlled variceal bleeding were randomized to an HVPG-guided therapy group (N = 84) or to a control group (N = 86). In both groups, HVPG and acute β-blocker response were evaluated at baseline and HVPG measurements were repeated at 2-4 weeks to determine chronic response. In the HVPG-guided group, acute responders were treated with nadolol and acute nonresponders with nadolol+nitrates. Chronic nonresponders received nadolol+prazosin and had a third HVPG study. Ligation sessions were repeated until response was achieved. The control group was treated with nadolol+nitrates+ligation. Between-group baseline characteristics were similar. During long-term follow-up (median of 24 months), mortality was lower in the HVPG-guided therapy group than in the control group (29% vs. 43%; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.35-0.99). Rebleeding occurred in 19% versus 31% of patients, respectively (HR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.29-0.98), and further decompensation of cirrhosis occurred in 52% versus 72% (HR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.46-0.99). The survival probability was higher with HVPG-guided therapy than in controls, both in acute (HR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.32-1.08) and chronic nonresponders (HR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.23-0.99). HVPG-guided patients had a greater reduction of HVPG and a lower final value than controls (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

HVPG monitoring, by stratifying risk and targeting therapy, improves the survival achieved with currently recommended treatment to prevent VRB using β-blockers and ligation. HVPG-guided therapy achieved a greater reduction in PP, which may have contributed to reduce the risk of rebleeding and of further decompensation of cirrhosis, thus contributing to a better survival. (Hepatology 2017;65:1693-1707).

摘要

目的

监测门脉压(PP)对药物治疗的血流动力学反应可准确分层静脉曲张再出血(VRB)的风险。我们评估了通过预防 VRB 用肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)监测指导治疗是否可以改善生存率。将接受控制的静脉曲张出血的肝硬化患者随机分为 HVPG 指导治疗组(N = 84)或对照组(N = 86)。两组均在基线时评估 HVPG 和急性β受体阻滞剂反应,并在 2-4 周时重复 HVPG 测量以确定慢性反应。在 HVPG 指导治疗组中,急性反应者用纳多洛尔治疗,急性无反应者用纳多洛尔加硝酸盐治疗。慢性无反应者接受纳多洛尔加普萘洛尔治疗,并进行第三次 HVPG 研究。结扎治疗重复进行直至达到反应。对照组用纳多洛尔加硝酸盐加结扎治疗。两组间的基线特征相似。在长期随访(中位 24 个月)中,HVPG 指导治疗组的死亡率低于对照组(29%比 43%;风险比[HR] = 0.59;95%置信区间[CI] = 0.35-0.99)。再出血分别发生在 19%和 31%的患者(HR = 0.53;95% CI = 0.29-0.98),肝硬化进一步失代偿分别发生在 52%和 72%的患者(HR = 0.68;95% CI = 0.46-0.99)。与对照组相比,HVPG 指导治疗的生存概率更高,无论是在急性(HR = 0.59;95% CI = 0.32-1.08)还是慢性无反应者(HR = 0.48;95% CI = 0.23-0.99)。HVPG 指导治疗的患者 HVPG 降低幅度更大,最终值更低(P < 0.05)。

结论

通过分层风险和靶向治疗,HVPG 监测可改善目前推荐的使用β受体阻滞剂和结扎预防 VRB 的治疗的生存率。HVPG 指导治疗可更大程度地降低 PP,这可能有助于降低再出血和肝硬化进一步失代偿的风险,从而提高生存率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验