Coe W C, Sluis A S
Department of Psychology, California State University, Fresno 93740-0011.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Nov;57(5):885-94. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.57.5.885.
The study investigated conditions that produce strong social pressures on posthypnotically amnesic Ss to remember more before being given the cue to remove amnesia. Highly susceptible Ss who passed posthypnotic amnesia were classified as voluntary or involuntary (having high or low control over recall). Test Ss were serially subjected to 3 pressure situations before being given the cue to lift amnesia: (a) instructions to be honest, (b) lie detection, and (c) a replay of a video of the session. Control Ss sat for the same amount of time and were only asked if they could remember anything else while the experimental Ss received the pressure recalls. All but 1 S breached in the experimental condition. Only the voluntary Ss breached in the control condition. Results are discussed as they relate to breaching amnesia and the voluntary dimension.
该研究调查了在给予解除失忆的提示之前，能对催眠后失忆的被试产生强大社会压力以使其回忆起更多内容的条件。通过催眠后失忆测试的高度易受暗示的被试被分为自愿型或非自愿型（对回忆有高或低的控制能力）。在给予解除失忆的提示之前，测试被试依次经历三种压力情境：(a) 要求诚实的指令，(b) 测谎，以及 (c) session视频的回放。对照被试静坐相同时长，并且在实验被试接受压力回忆时，仅被询问他们是否还能记起其他事情。除1名被试外，所有实验条件下的被试都出现了违反失忆的情况。只有自愿型被试在对照条件下出现了违反失忆的情况。讨论了与违反失忆和自愿维度相关的结果。
