Options for Prospective Meta-Analysis and Introduction of Registration-Based Prospective Meta-Analysis.
作者信息
Watt Caroline A, Kennedy James E
机构信息
School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh Edinburgh, UK.
Independent Researcher Broomfield, CO, USA.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 4;7:2030. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02030. eCollection 2016.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Options for Prospective Meta-Analysis and Introduction of Registration-Based Prospective Meta-Analysis.前瞻性Meta分析的选项及基于注册的前瞻性Meta分析的介绍。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 4;7:2030. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02030. eCollection 2016.
2
Association between trial registration and treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study.试验注册与治疗效果估计之间的关联：一项元流行病学研究。
BMC Med. 2016 Jul 4;14(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0639-x.
3
Researcher allegiance in research on psychosocial interventions: meta-research study protocol and pilot study.心理社会干预研究中的研究者利益关联：元研究方案与试点研究
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e024622. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024622.
4
Registered trials report less beneficial treatment effects than unregistered ones: a meta-epidemiological study in orthodontics.注册试验报告的治疗效果不如未注册试验：正畸领域的一项meta-流行病学研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;100:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
5
Researcher allegiance in psychotherapy outcome research: an overview of reviews.心理治疗结局研究中的研究人员偏向：综述概述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2013 Jun;33(4):501-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
6
Prevention of selective outcome reporting: let us start from the beginning.预防选择性结果报告：让我们从头开始。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;72(10):1283-1288. doi: 10.1007/s00228-016-2112-3. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
7
Options for a Health System Researcher to Choose in Meta Review (MR) Approaches-Meta Narrative (MN) and Meta Triangulation (MT).卫生系统研究人员在元综述（MR）方法中可选择的方案——元叙事（MN）和元三角互证（MT）。
Indian J Community Med. 2015 Jul-Sep;40(3):152-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.158843.
8
Bias from historical control groups used in orthodontic research: a meta-epidemiological study.正畸研究中使用历史对照组的偏倚：一项元流行病学研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2017 Feb;39(1):98-105. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjw035. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
9
Meta-analysis. A useful tool for the spine researcher.荟萃分析：脊柱研究人员的有用工具。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Sep 15;19(18 Suppl):2076S-2082S.
10
Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study.一项元流行病学研究表明，发表在高影响力期刊上的大多数系统评价都未对研究方案进行注册。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Apr;84:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
引用本文的文献
1
Addressing researcher fraud: retrospective, real-time, and preventive strategies-including legal points and data management that prevents fraud.应对研究人员欺诈行为：回顾性、实时性及预防性策略——包括预防欺诈的法律要点和数据管理。
Front Res Metr Anal. 2024 Jun 27;9:1397649. doi: 10.3389/frma.2024.1397649. eCollection 2024.
2
A new desorption method of polyurethane foam for the determination of gold and a comparative study on four desorption methods based on meta-analysis.一种用于测定金的聚氨酯泡沫新解吸方法及基于Meta分析的四种解吸方法比较研究
RSC Adv. 2023 Apr 20;13(18):12355-12360. doi: 10.1039/d3ra00118k. eCollection 2023 Apr 17.
3
Why Most Research Findings About Psi Are False: The Replicability Crisis, the Psi Paradox and the Myth of Sisyphus.为何大多数关于超心理学的研究发现都是错误的：可重复性危机、超心理学悖论与西西弗斯神话。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 18;11:562992. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562992. eCollection 2020.
4
Fragility index of network meta-analysis with application to smoking cessation data.网络荟萃分析的脆弱性指数及其在戒烟数据中的应用。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;127:29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
5
Using Meta-Analysis and Propensity Score Methods to Assess Treatment Effects Toward Evidence-Based Practice in Extensive Reading.运用Meta分析和倾向得分法评估泛读中基于证据的实践的治疗效果。
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 22;11:617. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00617. eCollection 2020.
本文引用的文献
1
NICE guidance on psychological treatments for bipolar disorder: searching for the evidence.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所关于双相情感障碍心理治疗的指南：寻找证据
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;3(4):386-8. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00545-3. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
2
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.心理学. 心理科学可重复性的评估.
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.
3
Likelihood of Null Effects of Large NHLBI Clinical Trials Has Increased over Time.美国国立心肺血液研究所（NHLBI）大型临床试验出现无效结果的可能性随时间增加。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 5;10(8):e0132382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132382. eCollection 2015.
4
An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research.纯粹确证性研究议程
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):632-8. doi: 10.1177/1745691612463078.
5
Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability.《科学乌托邦：二、调整激励机制与实践以促进追求真理而非追求可发表性》
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):615-31. doi: 10.1177/1745691612459058.
6
A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories: Publication Bias and Psychological Science's Aversion to the Null.大量的“僵尸”理论：发表偏倚与心理学科学界对无效假设的回避。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):555-61. doi: 10.1177/1745691612459059.
7
Lessons from the first two years of operating a study registry.运营研究注册库头两年的经验教训。
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 18;6:173. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00173. eCollection 2015.
8
Cognitive-behavioural therapy for the symptoms of schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis with examination of potential bias.认知行为疗法治疗精神分裂症症状的系统评价和荟萃分析，以及对潜在偏差的检查。
Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;204(1):20-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.116285.
9
Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling.用真话激励法来衡量可疑研究行为的发生率。
Psychol Sci. 2012 May 1;23(5):524-32. doi: 10.1177/0956797611430953. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
10
False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.虚假阳性心理学：在数据收集和分析中不披露的灵活性使得任何事物都可以被呈现为显著的。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417632. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
Zotero 插件