一本面向麻醉学、重症监护和疼痛医学领域的全新开放获取期刊。
: a new open access journal for anaesthesiology, critical care, and pain medicine.
作者信息
Hopkins Philip M
机构信息
Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
出版信息
BJA Open. 2022 Jan 17;1:100001. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2021.100001. eCollection 2022 Mar.
Abstract
is a new open access journal to complement . This editorial describes the rationale for the journal and the breadth of content it is seeking to attract. As with other BJA titles, conforms to the highest standards of editorial and publication practice, and it aims to provide sector-leading author experience combined with reliable peer-reviewed content for the reader.
摘要
是一本新的开放获取期刊，以补充…… 本社论阐述了该期刊的基本原理以及它旨在吸引的内容广度。与BJA的其他期刊一样，…… 符合编辑和出版实践的最高标准，旨在为读者提供行业领先的作者体验以及经过可靠同行评审的内容。
相似文献
1
: a new open access journal for anaesthesiology, critical care, and pain medicine.一本面向麻醉学、重症监护和疼痛医学领域的全新开放获取期刊。
BJA Open. 2022 Jan 17;1:100001. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2021.100001. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
The evolution of the British Journal of Anaesthesia: the first 100 years.《英国麻醉学杂志》的发展历程：头100年
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Jan;130(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.10.013. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
3
Turning the page on 2021: an eventful year for the British Journal of Anaesthesia.翻开 2021 年的新篇章：《英国麻醉学期刊》精彩纷呈的一年。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jan;128(1):1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.11.008. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
4
The BJA Editorial Fellowship 2024: a barometer for the state of academic anaesthesiology, perioperative, pain, and critical care medicine.2024 年英国麻醉师学会编辑研究员项目：学术麻醉学、围手术期医学、疼痛医学和重症监护医学状况的晴雨表。
Br J Anaesth. 2024 Jul;133(1):3-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.03.041. Epub 2024 May 13.
5
From mouthpiece of an emerging specialty to voice for high-quality research: the first 100 years of the British Journal of Anaesthesia.从新兴专业的喉舌到高质量研究的代言人：英国麻醉杂志的第一个 100 年。
Br J Anaesth. 2023 Aug;131(2):234-241. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.04.007. Epub 2023 May 15.
6
[25 years "Anesthesiology and Reanimation"--a historical review].[25年的“麻醉学与复苏”——历史回顾]
Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2000;25(1):4-11.
7
Accuracy of subject and author indexes in five anaesthesia journals.五本麻醉学杂志中主题索引和作者索引的准确性。
Br J Anaesth. 1995 Jan;74(1):104-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/74.1.104.
8
The Growth of Poorly Cited Articles in Peer-Reviewed Orthopaedic Journals.同行评议矫形外科期刊中引用不佳文章的增长。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jul;477(7):1727-1735. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000727.
9
How readers perceive the quality of six anesthesia journals, their editors and reviewers: a European survey.读者如何看待六种麻醉学期刊及其编辑和审稿人的质量：一项欧洲调查。
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2010;61(4):195-201.
10
A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.一个学术团体对出版的看法。
J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 2:17-23. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13674. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
本文引用的文献
1
How faculty define quality, prestige, and impact of academic journals.教师如何定义学术期刊的质量、声望和影响力。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 28;16(10):e0257340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257340. eCollection 2021.
2
(Im)precise trial descriptions.（表述）不精确的试验描述。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Dec;127(6):824-825. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.09.013. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
3
Open Access, Plan S, and researchers' needs.开放获取、Plan S 以及研究人员的需求。
EMBO Rep. 2020 Oct 5;21(10):e51568. doi: 10.15252/embr.202051568. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
4
Analysis of practices to promote reproducibility and transparency in anaesthesiology research.分析促进麻醉学研究可重复性和透明度的实践。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Nov;125(5):835-842. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.035. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
5
Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities.生物医学科学教师晋升和终身教职的学术标准：对国际大学样本的横断面分析。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 25;369:m2081. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2081.
6
Plan S for publishing science in an open access way: not everyone is likely to be happy.以开放获取方式发表科学成果的“计划S”：并非每个人都会满意。
Biophys Rev. 2019 Nov 10;11(6):841-2. doi: 10.1007/s12551-019-00604-4.
7
Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations.在学术评审、晋升和终身职位评估中使用期刊影响因子。
Elife. 2019 Jul 31;8:e47338. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47338.
8
Plan S: In service or disservice to society?《开放获取倡议计划 S：造福还是危害社会？》
Br J Pharmacol. 2019 Mar;176(6):753-756. doi: 10.1111/bph.14590.
9
Will Plan S put learned societies in jeopardy?“计划S”会使学术团体陷入危险境地吗？
FEBS Lett. 2019 Feb;593(4):383-385. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13333.
10
Plan S will hit some academic societies hard.“计划S”将对一些学术团体造成沉重打击。
Nature. 2018 Dec;564(7734):39. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-07609-1.
Zotero 插件