Suppr超能文献

X线摄影及腹部CT与骶髂关节CT在骶髂关节炎诊断中的比较。

Radiography and abdominal CT compared with sacroiliac joint CT in the diagnosis of sacroiliitis.

作者信息

Melchior Julian, Azraq Yusef, Chary-Valckenaere Isabelle, Rat Anne-Christine, Texeira Pedro, Blum Alain, Loeuille Damien

机构信息

1 Department of Rheumatology, CHU Nancy Brabois, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy cedex, France.

2 Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Acta Radiol. 2017 Oct;58(10):1252-1259. doi: 10.1177/0284185116688377. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

Abstract

Background The presence of structural sacroiliitis is strong evidence for the diagnosis of spondyloarthritis (SpA). Purpose To assess the performance of abdominal computed tomography (CT) and pelvic plain radiography for the diagnosis of structural sacroiliitis compared with sacroiliac CT (SI joint CT) considered the reference technique in patients with SpA. Material and Methods All SpA patients eligible for biologic treatment were selected from 2005 to 2012. An assessment of sacroiliitis was based on radiography according to the modified New York criteria and on abdominal CT and SI joint CT scans depending on the presence of erosion on at least two consecutive slices. A senior rheumatologist and radiologist independently scored the grade and diagnosis of structural sacroiliitis for the three imaging modalities. After a consensus reading of conflicting examinations (radiography and CT), a final diagnosis of structural sacroiliitis was attained. Results Of the 72 patients selected, sacroiliitis was diagnosed on radiography, abdominal CT, and SI joint CT in 40, 31, and 44 patients, respectively. Inter-reader agreements for the grade of sacroiliitis were substantial for the three imaging modalities, with a weighted kappa range of 0.63-0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.83), and they were moderate for the diagnosis of sacroiliitis, with a kappa range of 0.50-0.55 (95% CI, 0.32-0.74). The sensitivity and specificity were 79.1% and 70.5%, respectively, for radiography and 82.1% and 100%, respectively, for abdominal CT. Conclusion This study demonstrates the relevance of abdominal CT for the diagnosis of structural sacroiliitis, with good sensitivity and excellent specificity. These imaging techniques avoid unnecessary examinations.

摘要

背景

结构性骶髂关节炎的存在是脊柱关节炎(SpA)诊断的有力证据。目的:与骶髂关节CT(SI关节CT)(被视为SpA患者诊断的参考技术)相比,评估腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)和骨盆平片对结构性骶髂关节炎的诊断性能。材料与方法:选取2005年至2012年所有符合生物治疗条件的SpA患者。根据改良纽约标准通过X线摄影评估骶髂关节炎,并根据至少两个连续层面上是否存在侵蚀情况进行腹部CT和SI关节CT扫描。一位资深风湿病学家和放射科医生分别对三种成像方式的结构性骶髂关节炎分级和诊断进行评分。在对存在冲突的检查(X线摄影和CT)进行共识解读后,得出结构性骶髂关节炎的最终诊断。结果:在所选的72例患者中,分别有40例、31例和44例通过X线摄影、腹部CT和SI关节CT诊断出骶髂关节炎。三种成像方式在骶髂关节炎分级方面的阅片者间一致性较高,加权kappa值范围为0.63 - 0.75(95%置信区间[CI],0.52 - 0.83),而在骶髂关节炎诊断方面的一致性为中等,kappa值范围为0.50 - 0.55(95%CI,0.32 - 0.74)。X线摄影的敏感性和特异性分别为79.1%和70.5%,腹部CT的敏感性和特异性分别为82.1%和100%。结论:本研究证明了腹部CT在结构性骶髂关节炎诊断中的相关性,具有良好的敏感性和出色的特异性。这些成像技术避免了不必要的检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验