• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由在与患者身处不同物理位置的操作者通过机器人技术和远程通信相结合的方式进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:远程支架置入术可行性的早期探索(REMOTE-PCI研究)

Percutaneous coronary intervention using a combination of robotics and telecommunications by an operator in a separate physical location from the patient: an early exploration into the feasibility of telestenting (the REMOTE-PCI study).

作者信息

Madder Ryan D, VanOosterhout Stacie M, Jacoby Mark E, Collins J Stewart, Borgman Andrew S, Mulder Abbey N, Elmore Matthew A, Campbell Jessica L, McNamara Richard F, Wohns David H

机构信息

Frederik Meijer Heart & Vascular Institute, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2017 Jan 20;12(13):1569-1576. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00363.

DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00363
PMID:28105993
Abstract

AIMS

The present study explores the feasibility of telestenting, wherein a physician operator performs stenting on a patient in a separate physical location using a combination of robotics and telecommunications.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients undergoing robotic stenting were eligible for inclusion. All manipulations of guidewires, balloons, and stents were performed robotically by a physician operator located in an isolated separate room outside the procedure room housing the patient. Communication between the operating physician and laboratory personnel was via telecommunication devices providing real-time audio and video connectivity. Among 20 patients who consented to participate, technical success, defined as successful advancement and retraction of guidewires, balloons, and stents by the robotic system without conversion to manual operation, was achieved in 19 of 22 lesions (86.4%). Procedural success, defined as <30% residual stenosis upon completion of the procedure in the absence of death or repeat revascularisation prior to hospital discharge, was achieved in 19 of 20 patients (95.0%). There were no deaths or repeat revascularisations prior to hospital discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to explore the feasibility of telestenting. Additional studies are required to determine if future advancements in robotics will facilitate telestenting over greater geographic distances.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨远程支架置入术的可行性,即医生操作者利用机器人技术和通信技术的结合,在与患者身处不同物理位置的地方为患者进行支架置入术。

方法与结果

接受机器人支架置入术的患者符合纳入标准。导丝、球囊和支架的所有操作均由位于患者所在手术室之外独立房间的医生操作者通过机器人进行。手术医生与实验室人员之间通过提供实时音频和视频连接的通信设备进行沟通。在20名同意参与的患者中,22处病变中有19处(86.4%)实现了技术成功,技术成功定义为机器人系统成功推进和回撤导丝、球囊和支架且未转为手动操作。20名患者中有19名(95.0%)实现了手术成功,手术成功定义为在出院前无死亡或再次血管重建的情况下,术后残余狭窄<30%。出院前无死亡或再次血管重建情况。

结论

据我们所知,本研究是首次探讨远程支架置入术可行性的研究。需要进一步研究以确定机器人技术未来的进展是否将有助于在更大地理距离上进行远程支架置入术。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous coronary intervention using a combination of robotics and telecommunications by an operator in a separate physical location from the patient: an early exploration into the feasibility of telestenting (the REMOTE-PCI study).由在与患者身处不同物理位置的操作者通过机器人技术和远程通信相结合的方式进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:远程支架置入术可行性的早期探索(REMOTE-PCI研究)
EuroIntervention. 2017 Jan 20;12(13):1569-1576. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00363.
2
Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study.机器人经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性和可行性:PRECISE(经皮机器人增强冠状动脉介入治疗)研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Apr 16;61(15):1596-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.045.
3
First-in-human evaluation of a novel robotic-assisted coronary angioplasty system.首例新型机器人辅助冠状动脉成形术系统的人体评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Apr;4(4):460-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.12.007.
4
Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions: Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗复杂冠状动脉病变的安全性和可行性研究:CORA-PCI 研究结果(复杂机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul 10;10(13):1320-1327. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.050.
5
First-in-human robotic percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main stenosis.首例应用机器人进行的无保护左主干狭窄经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct;88(4):565-570. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26550. Epub 2016 May 18.
6
Robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Reasons for partial manual assistance or manual conversion.机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:部分手动辅助或手动转换的原因。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Jul;19(5 Pt A):526-531. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
7
Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention (R-PCI): Time to focus on the pros and cons.机器人经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(R-PCI):是时候关注利弊了。
Indian Heart J. 2023 May-Jun;75(3):161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.04.002. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
8
Robotic telestenting performance in transcontinental and regional pre-clinical models.机器人远程扩张术在洲际和区域性临床前模型中的表现。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 15;97(3):E327-E332. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29115. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
9
Network latency and long-distance robotic telestenting: Exploring the potential impact of network delays on telestenting performance.网络延迟和远程机器人经皮腔内血管成形术:探索网络延迟对经皮腔内血管成形术性能的潜在影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr 1;95(5):914-919. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28425. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
10
Complex robotic-enhanced percutaneous coronary intervention.复杂的机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May 1;83(6):915-21. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25271. Epub 2014 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Robot-Assisted Cardiovascular Interventions.机器人辅助心血管介入治疗
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Mar 18;4(3Part B):102568. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2025.102568. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Robotics for Neuroendovascular Therapy.用于神经血管内治疗的机器人技术。
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2025;19(1). doi: 10.5797/jnet.ra.2024-0112. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
3
Transatlantic Telerobotic Coronary Angiography: A Pre-clinical Feasibility Study.跨大西洋远程机器人冠状动脉造影:一项临床前可行性研究。
JACC Adv. 2024 Dec 16;4(1):101456. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101456. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Features and Limitations of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (R-PCI): A Systematic Review of R-PCI.机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(R-PCI)的特点与局限性:R-PCI的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 19;13(18):5537. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185537.
5
Narrative review of latest research progress about robotic percutaneous coronary intervention.关于机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗最新研究进展的叙述性综述。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024 Aug 28;21(8):816-825. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.08.004.
6
One-year outcome of robotical vs. manual percutaneous coronary intervention.机器人辅助与手动经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的一年期结果
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02524-0.
7
Latest Developments in Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.机器人辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的最新进展
Interv Cardiol. 2023 Dec 6;18:e30. doi: 10.15420/icr.2023.03. eCollection 2023.
8
Robotic-Assisted Solutions for Invasive Cardiology, Cardiac Surgery and Routine On-Ward Tasks: A Narrative Review.用于侵入性心脏病学、心脏外科手术和日常病房任务的机器人辅助解决方案:一篇叙述性综述。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Sep 18;10(9):399. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10090399.
9
Feasibility of robotic neuroendovascular surgery.机器人神经血管内手术的可行性。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Oct;30(5):611-618. doi: 10.1177/15910199221097898. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
10
Evolving Diagnostic and Management Advances in Coronary Heart Disease.冠心病诊断与管理的进展
Life (Basel). 2023 Apr 5;13(4):951. doi: 10.3390/life13040951.