• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少患者的不确定性:实施共同决策过程可提高治疗质量并改善医患沟通。

Reducing Patient Uncertainty: Implementation of a Shared Decision-Making Process Enhances Treatment Quality and Provider Communication.

作者信息

Gustafson Annika

机构信息

Seattle Cancer Care Alliance.

出版信息

Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Feb 1;21(1):113-115. doi: 10.1188/17.CJON.113-115.

DOI:10.1188/17.CJON.113-115
PMID:28107332
Abstract

Patients with cancer can experience uncertainty when making treatment decisions. When unaddressed, patient uncertainty can result in decisional conflict and decisional regret. Providers can assist in decreasing these factors by involving patients in the decision-making process. Patients who agree to participate should be informed about their diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment options, including the benefits, the risks and harms, or the option of no treatment. Providers also can help patients to clarify their values, which reveal patient preferences and inform tailoring of care for each patient. When an informed patient's personal preferences align with care decisions, decisional quality is achieved.

摘要

癌症患者在做出治疗决策时可能会经历不确定性。如果不加以解决,患者的不确定性可能会导致决策冲突和决策后悔。医疗服务提供者可以通过让患者参与决策过程来帮助减少这些因素。同意参与的患者应被告知其诊断、预后和治疗选择,包括益处、风险和危害,或不治疗的选择。医疗服务提供者还可以帮助患者明确他们的价值观,这些价值观揭示了患者的偏好,并为为每位患者量身定制护理提供依据。当知情患者的个人偏好与护理决策一致时,就实现了决策质量。

相似文献

1
Reducing Patient Uncertainty: Implementation of a Shared Decision-Making Process Enhances Treatment Quality and Provider Communication.减少患者的不确定性:实施共同决策过程可提高治疗质量并改善医患沟通。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Feb 1;21(1):113-115. doi: 10.1188/17.CJON.113-115.
2
Decisional Control Preferences in the Hispanic Population in the Bronx.布朗克斯区西班牙裔人群的决策控制偏好
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Jun;34(3):472-477. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1325-9.
3
Navigating the unknown: shared decision-making in the face of uncertainty.探索未知:面对不确定性时的共同决策。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 May;30(5):675-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3074-8.
4
Patient preference for involvement, experienced involvement, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with physician: a structural equation model test.患者对参与、体验参与、决策冲突以及对医生的满意度的偏好:结构方程模型检验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun 25;13:231. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-231.
5
When do cancer patients regret their treatment decision? A path analysis of the influence of clinicians' communication styles and the match of decision-making styles on decision regret.癌症患者何时会后悔他们的治疗决定?一项关于临床医生沟通方式及决策风格匹配对决策后悔影响的路径分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 May;99(5):739-46. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.019. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
6
Decisional Quality Among Patients Making Treatment Decisions for Urolithiasis.患者在治疗尿路结石时的决策质量。
Urology. 2019 Nov;133:109-115. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.07.023. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
7
Integrating Patient Preference into Treatment Decisions for Men with Prostate Cancer at the Point of Care.在护理点将患者偏好纳入前列腺癌男性的治疗决策中。
J Urol. 2016 Dec;196(6):1640-1644. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.082. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
8
Why do some patients prefer to leave decisions up to the doctor: lack of self-efficacy or a matter of trust?为什么有些患者更愿意将决策交给医生:是缺乏自我效能感还是信任问题?
J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Dec;7(4):592-601. doi: 10.1007/s11764-013-0298-2. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
9
Decisional control preferences, disclosure of information preferences, and satisfaction among Hispanic patients with advanced cancer.晚期癌症西班牙裔患者的决策控制偏好、信息披露偏好及满意度
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 May;47(5):896-905. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.06.010. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived Discrimination in Health Care Settings and Care Delays in Patients With Diabetes and Hypertension.医疗环境中感知到的歧视与糖尿病和高血压患者的护理延误
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250046. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0046.
2
Caregiving risk perception characteristics and associated factors among informal caregivers of functionally dependent elderly individuals at home: a qualitative study.居家功能依赖老年人非正式照料者的照护风险认知特征及相关因素:一项定性研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Aug 7;23(1):536. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02211-5.
3
"It feels like you have to choose one or the other": a qualitative analysis of obstetrician focus groups on periviability counseling.
“感觉你必须二选一”:对围产儿生存能力咨询的产科医生焦点小组的定性分析。
J Perinat Med. 2024 Jun 18;52(7):696-705. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2023-0322. Print 2024 Sep 25.
4
Assessing Knowledge, Competence, and Performance Following Web-Based Education on Early Breast Cancer Management: Health Care Professional Questionnaire Study and Anonymized Patient Records Analysis.基于网络的早期乳腺癌管理教育后的知识、能力和表现评估:医疗保健专业人员问卷调查研究与匿名患者记录分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Mar 21;8:e50931. doi: 10.2196/50931.
5
Biosimilars: From Production to Patient.生物类似药:从生产到患者。
J Infus Nurs. 2024;47(1):19-29. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000528.
6
Decisional conflict and its determinants among patients with cancer undergoing immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy or targeted therapy: a cross-sectional study.癌症患者在接受免疫治疗联合化疗或靶向治疗时的决策冲突及其决定因素:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 5;13(1):12715. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39280-6.
7
Facilitating psychological adjustment for breast cancer patients through empathic communication and uncertainty reduction.通过共情沟通和减少不确定性促进乳腺癌患者的心理调整。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Sep;114:107791. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107791. Epub 2023 May 15.
8
Mitigating negative emotions through virtual reality and embodiment.通过虚拟现实和具身化来减轻负面情绪。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Aug 3;16:916227. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.916227. eCollection 2022.
9
Health Disparities: Impact of Health Disparities and Treatment Decision-Making Biases on Cancer Adverse Effects Among Black Cancer Survivors.健康差异:健康差异和治疗决策偏见对黑人癌症幸存者癌症不良影响的影响。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Oct 1;25(5):17-24. doi: 10.1188/21.CJON.S1.17-24.
10
Shared decision-making in the ICU from the perspective of physicians, nurses and patients: a qualitative interview study.重症监护室中从医生、护士和患者角度出发的共同决策:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 11;11(8):e050134. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050134.