• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Decisional control preferences, disclosure of information preferences, and satisfaction among Hispanic patients with advanced cancer.晚期癌症西班牙裔患者的决策控制偏好、信息披露偏好及满意度
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 May;47(5):896-905. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.06.010. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
2
Decisional Control Preferences in the Hispanic Population in the Bronx.布朗克斯区西班牙裔人群的决策控制偏好
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Jun;34(3):472-477. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1325-9.
3
Decisional control preferences of Hispanic patients with advanced cancer from the United States and Latin America.美国和拉丁美洲晚期癌症西班牙裔患者的决策控制偏好。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Sep;46(3):376-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.08.015. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
4
[Information disclosure and decision making preferences of patients with advanced cancer in a Pain and Palliative Care Unit in Chile].[智利一家疼痛与姑息治疗病房中晚期癌症患者的信息披露与决策偏好]
Rev Med Chil. 2014 Jan;142(1):48-54. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872014000100008.
5
Decisional control preferences of patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care.晚期癌症接受姑息治疗患者的决策控制偏好。
Palliat Support Care. 2018 Oct;16(5):544-551. doi: 10.1017/S1478951517000803. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
6
A multicenter survey of Hispanic caregiver preferences for patient decision control in the United States and Latin America.一项关于美国和拉丁美洲西班牙裔照顾者对患者决策控制偏好的多中心调查。
Palliat Med. 2013 Jul;27(7):692-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216313486953. Epub 2013 May 13.
7
Decisional control preferences among patients with advanced cancer: An international multicenter cross-sectional survey.晚期癌症患者的决策控制偏好:一项国际多中心横断面调查。
Palliat Med. 2018 Apr;32(4):870-880. doi: 10.1177/0269216317747442. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
8
Decision-Making Preferences among Advanced Cancer Patients in a Palliative Setting in Jordan.约旦缓和医疗环境下晚期癌症患者的决策偏好。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 18;20(8):5550. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20085550.
9
Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions.对信息的需求及参与治疗决策的情况:老年癌症患者的偏好及其医生的认知
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 20;25(33):5275-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.1922.
10
Patient's Decisional Control Preferences of a Cohort of Patients With Advanced Cancer Receiving Palliative Care in India.印度接受姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者队列的患者决策控制偏好
J Palliat Care. 2019 Jul;34(3):175-180. doi: 10.1177/0825859719827316. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges in Palliative Care in Latin America: A Narrative Review.拉丁美洲姑息治疗面临的挑战:一项叙述性综述。
Cureus. 2024 May 20;16(5):e60698. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60698. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Considerations for Pain Assessments in Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review of the Latin American Perspective.癌症患者疼痛评估的考量因素:拉丁美洲视角的叙述性综述
Cureus. 2023 Jun 22;15(6):e40804. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40804. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Adaptation of a Multimedia Chemotherapy Educational Intervention for Latinos: Letting Patient Narratives Speak for Themselves.多媒体化疗教育干预措施在拉丁裔人群中的适应性调整:让患者叙事为自己发声。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Aug;38(4):1353-1362. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02270-3. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
4
Decision regret related to urinary diversion choices after cystectomy among Chinese bladder cancer patients.膀胱癌患者膀胱切除术后尿路分流选择的决策后悔。
Cancer Med. 2023 Feb;12(4):4786-4793. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5281. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
5
Patients' perceptions of a culturally targeted Hispanic Kidney Transplant Program: A mixed methods study.患者对具有文化针对性的西班牙裔肾脏移植项目的看法:一项混合方法研究。
Clin Transplant. 2019 Jun;33(6):e13577. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13577. Epub 2019 May 23.
6
Comparison of Outpatient Satisfaction Survey Scores for Asian Physicians and Non-Hispanic White Physicians.亚裔医生和非西班牙裔白人医生的门诊患者满意度调查评分比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Feb 1;2(2):e190027. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0027.
7
Is Shared Decision Making for End-of-Life Decisions Associated With Better Outcomes as Compared to Other Forms of Decision Making? A Systematic Literature Review.与其他形式的决策相比,临终决策中的共同决策是否会带来更好的结果?一项系统文献综述。
MDM Policy Pract. 2016 Jul 7;1(1):2381468316642237. doi: 10.1177/2381468316642237. eCollection 2016 Jul-Dec.
8
A prospective observational study to assess clinical decision-making, prognosis, quality of life and satisfaction with care in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: the CLARITY study protocol.一项评估复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者临床决策、预后、生活质量和护理满意度的前瞻性观察性研究:CLARITY 研究方案。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jun 18;16(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0953-4.
9
Decisional Control Preferences in the Hispanic Population in the Bronx.布朗克斯区西班牙裔人群的决策控制偏好
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Jun;34(3):472-477. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1325-9.
10
Enhancing Pediatric Palliative Care for Latino Children and Their Families: A Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Research and Practice in the United States.加强对拉丁裔儿童及其家庭的儿科姑息治疗:美国文献综述及研究与实践建议
Children (Basel). 2017 Dec 22;5(1):2. doi: 10.3390/children5010002.

本文引用的文献

1
Decisional control preferences of Hispanic patients with advanced cancer from the United States and Latin America.美国和拉丁美洲晚期癌症西班牙裔患者的决策控制偏好。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Sep;46(3):376-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.08.015. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
2
Promoting consultation recording practice in oncology: identification of critical implementation factors and determination of patient benefit.促进肿瘤学咨询记录实践:确定关键实施因素和确定患者获益。
Psychooncology. 2013 Jun;22(6):1273-82. doi: 10.1002/pon.3135. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
3
End-of-life preferences in advanced cancer patients willing to discuss issues surrounding their terminal condition.晚期癌症患者临终偏好调查:愿意讨论临终相关问题。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012 Sep;21(5):623-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2012.01347.x. Epub 2012 Apr 22.
4
Meeting the decision-making preferences of patients with breast cancer in oncology consultations: impact on decision-related outcomes.满足肿瘤学咨询中乳腺癌患者的决策偏好:对决策相关结果的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 10;30(8):857-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.7952. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
5
Measurement of shared decision making - a review of instruments.共同决策的测量——工具综述
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(4):313-24. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.012. Epub 2011 May 4.
6
Supporting treatment decision making in advanced cancer: a randomized trial of a decision aid for patients with advanced colorectal cancer considering chemotherapy.支持晚期癌症的治疗决策:一项针对考虑化疗的晚期结直肠癌患者的决策辅助工具的随机试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 20;29(15):2077-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.0754. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
7
A preliminary study comparing attitudes toward hospice referral between African American and white American primary care physicians.一项比较非裔美国和白种美国初级保健医生对临终关怀转诊态度的初步研究。
J Palliat Med. 2011 May;14(5):542-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0426. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
8
Shared decision-making in palliative care: a systematic mixed studies review using narrative synthesis.舒缓医疗中的共同决策:一项使用叙述性综合方法的系统混合研究综述。
Palliat Med. 2011 Apr;25(3):242-61. doi: 10.1177/0269216310389348. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
9
Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the Control Preferences Scale.癌症患者在治疗决策中的偏好角色:使用控制偏好量表的研究的汇总分析。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Sep;16(9):688-96.
10
Preferences of patients with advanced lung cancer regarding the involvement of family and others in medical decision-making.晚期肺癌患者对家庭成员和他人参与医疗决策的偏好。
J Palliat Med. 2010 Oct;13(10):1199-203. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0100.

晚期癌症西班牙裔患者的决策控制偏好、信息披露偏好及满意度

Decisional control preferences, disclosure of information preferences, and satisfaction among Hispanic patients with advanced cancer.

作者信息

Noguera Antonio, Yennurajalingam Sriram, Torres-Vigil Isabel, Parsons Henrique Afonseca, Duarte Eva Rosina, Palma Alejandra, Bunge Sofia, Palmer J Lynn, Bruera Eduardo

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA; Hospital Centro de Cuidados Laguna, Madrid, Spain.

Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 May;47(5):896-905. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.06.010. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.06.010
PMID:24035071
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5841454/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Studies to determine the decisional control preferences (DCPs) in Hispanic patients receiving palliative care are limited.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to describe DCPs, disclosure of information, and satisfaction with decision making among Hispanics and to determine the degree of concordance between patients' DCPs and their self-reported decisions.

METHODS

We surveyed 387 cancer patients referred to outpatient palliative care clinics in Argentina, Chile, Guatemala, and the U.S. DCPs were measured with the Control Preference Scale, disclosure preferences with the Disclosure of Information Preferences questionnaire, and satisfaction with care with the Satisfaction with Decision Scale.

RESULTS

In this study, 182 patients (47.6%) preferred shared decisional control, 119 (31.2%) preferred active decisional control, and 81 (21.2%) preferred a passive approach. Concerning their diagnosis and prognosis, 345 (92%) patients wanted to know their diagnosis, and 355 (94%) wanted to know their prognosis. Three hundred thirty-seven (87%) patients were satisfied with the decision-making process. DCPs were concordant with the self-reported decision-making process in 264 (69%) patients (weighted kappa = 0.55). Patients' greater satisfaction with the decision-making process was correlated with older age (P ≤ 0.001) and with a preference for enhanced diagnostic disclosure (P ≤ 0.024). Satisfaction did not correlate with concordance in the decision-making process.

CONCLUSION

The vast majority preferred a shared or active decision-making process and wanted information about their diagnosis and prognosis. Older patients and those who wanted to know their diagnosis seemed to be more satisfied with the way treatment decisions were made.

摘要

背景

关于确定接受姑息治疗的西班牙裔患者的决策控制偏好(DCP)的研究有限。

目的

本研究的目的是描述西班牙裔患者的决策控制偏好、信息披露情况以及对决策的满意度,并确定患者的决策控制偏好与其自我报告的决策之间的一致程度。

方法

我们对阿根廷、智利、危地马拉和美国门诊姑息治疗诊所转诊的387名癌症患者进行了调查。使用控制偏好量表测量决策控制偏好,使用信息披露偏好问卷测量信息披露偏好,使用决策满意度量表测量对护理的满意度。

结果

在本研究中,182名患者(47.6%)倾向于共同决策控制,119名(31.2%)倾向于积极决策控制,81名(21.2%)倾向于被动决策方式。关于他们的诊断和预后,345名(92%)患者想知道自己的诊断,355名(94%)想知道自己的预后。337名(87%)患者对决策过程感到满意。264名(69%)患者的决策控制偏好与自我报告的决策过程一致(加权kappa = 0.55)。患者对决策过程更高的满意度与年龄较大(P≤0.001)以及对增强诊断信息披露的偏好(P≤0.024)相关。满意度与决策过程中的一致性无关。

结论

绝大多数患者倾向于共同或积极的决策过程,并希望了解有关他们诊断和预后的信息。老年患者和那些想知道自己诊断的患者似乎对治疗决策的方式更满意。