Li Lingling, Tang Shijie, Jiang Liewen
Biostatistics, Sanofi Genzyme, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A.
Biostatistics, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Stat Med. 2017 May 10;36(10):1532-1547. doi: 10.1002/sim.7224. Epub 2017 Jan 22.
It is very challenging to estimate the comparative treatment effect between a treatment therapy and a control therapy on overall survival in the presence of treatment crossover, switch to an alternative non-study therapy, and non-random patient dropout. Existing methods (e.g., intent-to-treat and per-protocol) are known to be biased. We proposed two new estimators to address these analytical challenges and evaluated their performance via a comprehensive simulation study. The new estimators were constructed by combining an enhanced rank-preserving structural failure time model and the inverse probability censoring weighting approach. In the simulation study, we assessed and compared the performance of the two new estimators with four estimators from existing methods. The simulation results show that the new estimators have much better performance in almost all considered settings compared with the existing estimators. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
在存在治疗交叉、改用替代非研究治疗以及非随机患者退出的情况下,估计一种治疗疗法与一种对照疗法对总生存期的比较治疗效果极具挑战性。已知现有方法(例如意向性治疗和符合方案分析)存在偏差。我们提出了两种新的估计方法来应对这些分析挑战,并通过全面的模拟研究评估了它们的性能。新的估计方法是通过结合增强的秩保持结构失效时间模型和逆概率删失加权方法构建的。在模拟研究中,我们评估并比较了这两种新估计方法与现有方法中的四种估计方法的性能。模拟结果表明,与现有估计方法相比,新的估计方法在几乎所有考虑的设置中都具有更好的性能。版权所有© 2017约翰威立父子有限公司。