• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙槽嵴劈开术与自体块状骨移植术:并发症及种植体存留率

Alveolar Ridge Splitting Versus Autogenous Onlay Bone Grafting: Complications and Implant Survival Rates.

作者信息

Altiparmak Nur, Akdeniz S S, Bayram B, Gulsever S, Uckan S

机构信息

*Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey. †Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey. ‡Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey. §Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Implant Dent. 2017 Apr;26(2):284-287. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000541.

DOI:10.1097/ID.0000000000000541
PMID:28114264
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the complications and implant survival rates of localized alveolar ridge deficiencies in the horizontal dimension reconstructed by alveolar ridge splitting (ARS) or autogenous onlay bone grafting (OBG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight ARS and 28 OBG were performed. The survival rate of the all included implants was evaluated using the clinical and radiographical evaluation criteria of Misch et al. Temporary exposure of graft, mild infection, temporary paresthesia, and bad split were defined as minor complications; permanent exposure of graft, loss of graft, and permanent paresthesia were defined as major complications. Major and minor complications of ARS and OBG groups were statistically compared.

RESULTS

When the minor and major complication rates are considered, there was not any statistically significant difference between OBG (P = 0.099) and ARS (P = 0.241) groups. The satisfactory survival rate of OBG group was 92% and was 100% in the ARS group, and the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.116).

CONCLUSION

When reconstructing vertically sufficient but horizontally insufficient alveolar ridges, ridge splitting technique could shorten the treatment period, decrease postoperative swelling and pain, eliminate the need for a second surgical site, reduce the treatment cost, and ease the patient cooperation to the surgery.

摘要

目的

比较采用牙槽嵴劈开术(ARS)或自体块状骨移植术(OBG)重建水平维度局部牙槽嵴缺损的并发症及种植体存活率。

材料与方法

实施了28例ARS和28例OBG。采用Misch等人的临床和影像学评估标准评估所有纳入种植体的存活率。移植物临时暴露、轻度感染、临时感觉异常和不良劈开被定义为轻微并发症;移植物永久暴露、移植物丢失和永久感觉异常被定义为严重并发症。对ARS组和OBG组的严重及轻微并发症进行统计学比较。

结果

考虑轻微和严重并发症发生率时,OBG组(P = 0.099)和ARS组(P = 0.241)之间无统计学显著差异。OBG组的满意存活率为92%,ARS组为100%,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.116)。

结论

在重建垂直高度足够但水平宽度不足的牙槽嵴时,牙槽嵴劈开技术可缩短治疗周期,减轻术后肿胀和疼痛,无需第二个手术部位,降低治疗成本,并便于患者配合手术。

相似文献

1
Alveolar Ridge Splitting Versus Autogenous Onlay Bone Grafting: Complications and Implant Survival Rates.牙槽嵴劈开术与自体块状骨移植术:并发症及种植体存留率
Implant Dent. 2017 Apr;26(2):284-287. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000541.
2
Ridge expansion alone or in combination with guided bone regeneration to facilitate implant placement in narrow alveolar ridges: a retrospective study.单纯牙槽嵴扩展或联合引导骨再生以促进在狭窄牙槽嵴中植入种植体:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Feb;26(2):204-11. doi: 10.1111/clr.12317. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
3
Efficacy of Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Expansion Through the Alveolar Ridge Split Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.通过牙槽嵴劈开术进行水平牙槽嵴扩展的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023 Dec 12;38(6):1083-1096. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9972.
4
Alveolar distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous onlay bone grafting for alveolar ridge augmentation: Technique, complications, and implant survival rates.用于牙槽嵴增高的牙槽骨牵张成骨术与自体块状骨移植术:技术、并发症及种植体存活率
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Oct;106(4):511-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.011.
5
Comparison of alveolar ridge splitting and autogenous onlay bone grafting to enable implant placement in patients with atrophic jaw bones.牙槽嵴劈开术与自体块状骨移植术用于萎缩性颌骨患者种植体植入的比较。
Saudi Med J. 2017 Dec;38(12):1207-1212. doi: 10.15537/smj.2017.12.21462.
6
Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study.使用3种不同瓣方法进行牙槽嵴劈开扩展以植入牙种植体时的边缘骨稳定性:一项为期1年的临床研究
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Sep;67(9):1921-30. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.017.
7
Alveolar distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous onlay bone graft for vertical augmentation of severely atrophied alveolar ridges after 12 years of long-term follow-up.肺泡牵张成骨与自体骨块游离移植在严重萎缩牙槽嵴垂直向增量中的 12 年长期随访比较。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Nov;116(5):540-9. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.06.037. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
8
Deep-frozen allogeneic onlay bone grafts for reconstruction of atrophic maxillary alveolar ridges: a preliminary study.用于萎缩性上颌牙槽嵴重建的深冻同种异体贴附骨移植:一项初步研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jun;67(6):1300-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.12.043.
9
Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible.用于在上颌和下颌萎缩无牙颌中植入种植体的替代性骨扩张技术。
J Oral Implantol. 2011 Aug;37(4):463-71. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00028. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
10
The efficacy of alveolar ridge split on implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.牙槽嵴劈开术对种植体疗效的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Nov 20;23(1):894. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03643-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Customized 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation: A Scoping Review of Workflows, Technology, and Materials.用于牙槽嵴增高的定制3D打印支架:工作流程、技术和材料的范围综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 14;61(7):1269. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071269.
2
Effectiveness of bone expansion, compacting and densification in narrow alveolar crests: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.窄牙槽嵴中骨扩张、挤压和致密化的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Jun 25;13:1630495. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1630495. eCollection 2025.
3
Utilization of magnetic mallet during dental implantation in narrow mandibular alveolar ridge: A case report.
狭窄下颌牙槽嵴牙种植术中磁性骨锤的应用:一例报告。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Jan;126:110679. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110679. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
4
The efficacy of alveolar ridge split on implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.牙槽嵴劈开术对种植体疗效的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Nov 20;23(1):894. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03643-2.
5
Short-Term Evaluation of Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Thin Wiry Ridge by Ridge Splitting and Simultaneous Implants Placement: Non-randomized Control Trial.通过牙槽嵴劈开联合同期种植对薄而嵴顶呈线状的牙槽嵴进行修复的短期评估:非随机对照试验
Eur J Dent. 2022 May;16(2):414-423. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1736292. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
6
Ridge augmentation-The new field of computerized guided surgery: A technical note for minimal-invasive bone splitting.牙槽嵴增高术——计算机辅助引导手术的新领域:微创骨劈开技术说明
Clin Case Rep. 2021 Mar 20;9(4):2390-2396. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.4046. eCollection 2021 Apr.
7
The Alveolar Ridge Splitting Technique on Maxillae: A Biomechanical Human Cadaveric Investigation.上颌牙槽嵴劈开技术:一项基于人体尸体的生物力学研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Nov 19;2020:8894471. doi: 10.1155/2020/8894471. eCollection 2020.
8
Clinical and histological sequelae of surgical complications in horizontal guided bone regeneration: a systematic review and proposal for management.水平引导骨再生手术并发症的临床及组织学后遗症:一项系统评价及处理建议
Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Nov 26;6(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00274-y.
9
Two bone blocks sandwich technique for horizontal reconstruction of severely atrophic alveolar ridge in anterior maxilla: A case report.两骨块三明治技术用于上颌前部严重萎缩牙槽嵴的水平重建:一例报告。
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Mar 6;8(5):971-979. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i5.971.
10
Maxillary Alveolar Ridge Expansion with Split-Crest Technique Compared with Lateral Ridge Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Block Graft: a Systematic Review.采用劈嵴技术的上颌牙槽嵴扩展与自体骨块移植的侧方嵴增高术的比较:一项系统评价
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2019 Dec 30;10(4):e2. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2019.10402. eCollection 2019 Oct-Dec.