Suppr超能文献

[抗血管内皮生长因子玻璃体内注射策略:“按需治疗与治疗并延长”]

[Strategies of Intravitreal Injections with Anti-VEGF: "Pro re Nata versus Treat and Extend"].

作者信息

Hufendiek K, Pielen A, Framme C

机构信息

Universitätsklinik für Augenheilkunde, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.

出版信息

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2018 Aug;235(8):930-939. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-122340. Epub 2017 Jan 23.

Abstract

The goal of this report is to provide a review on different strategies for the use of pro re nata (PRN) and treat and extend (T&E) regimens with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents (bevacizumab, ranibizumab or aflibercept) in patients with retinal diseases such as neovascular AMD, diabetic macular oedema and macular oedema due to retinal vein occlusion. The main focus is to present the effectiveness and visual outcomes of both PRN and T&E regimens in the main pivotal trials and studies based on currently available evidence. We also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both regimens, as well as monitoring and treatment of the disease, including treatment intervals and injection frequency. Currently there is increasing interest in establishing a regimen which offers the best visual outcome with lower injection frequency, and with reduced treatment burden by individualising treatment intervals and minimising the number of clinic visits and costs. Studies have shown that the PRN regimens in a clinical setting are insufficient in assuring the best visual outcome. The PRN regime requires frequent clinic visits to monitor disease status and intravitreal treatment if needed in a reactive approach. Individualised T&E regimens can improve visual outcome and require fewer injections than those administered in a monthly regimen and fewer monitoring visits than those in a PRN regimen.

摘要

本报告的目的是综述针对视网膜疾病(如新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性、糖尿病性黄斑水肿和视网膜静脉阻塞所致黄斑水肿)患者,使用玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)药物(贝伐单抗、雷珠单抗或阿柏西普)的按需(PRN)和治疗并延长(T&E)方案的不同策略。主要重点是根据现有证据,在主要关键试验和研究中呈现PRN和T&E方案的有效性及视觉转归。我们还将讨论这两种方案的优缺点,以及疾病的监测与治疗,包括治疗间隔和注射频率。目前,人们越来越关注建立一种能以较低注射频率提供最佳视觉转归的方案,通过个体化治疗间隔、减少门诊就诊次数和成本来减轻治疗负担。研究表明,临床环境中的PRN方案不足以确保最佳视觉转归。PRN方案需要频繁门诊就诊以监测疾病状态,并在需要时以反应性方式进行玻璃体内治疗。个体化T&E方案可改善视觉转归,与每月给药方案相比所需注射次数更少,与PRN方案相比监测就诊次数更少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验