Balsam Paweł, Ozierański Krzysztof, Tymińska Agata, Główczyńska Renata, Peller Michał, Fojt Anna, Cacko Andrzej, Sieradzki Bartosz, Bakuła Elwira, Markulis Maciej, Kowalik Robert, Huczek Zenon, Filipiak Krzysztof J, Opolski Grzegorz, Grabowski Marcin
1st Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Public Central Teaching Hospital in Warsaw, 1a Banacha St., Warsaw, 02-097, Poland.
Trials. 2017 Jan 23;18(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1760-z.
Approximately 50% of heart failure patients are readmitted to hospital within 6 months, owing to deterioration of their condition. Thus, symptomatic treatment of heart failure requires significant improvement. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of torasemide and furosemide on biochemical parameters of haemodynamic and neurohormonal compensation, myocardial remodelling, clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure.
This is a multicentre, randomized, open, blinded endpoint phase-IV trial. The study includes 120 heart failure patients in NYHA (New York Heart Association) functional class II-IV, treated with optimal heart failure therapy, with indications for use of loop diuretics. At enrolment, patients are stable, with a fixed dose of loop diuretics. Patients are randomized to treatment with furosemide or torasemide (randomization 1:1). After randomization, the current fixed dose of furosemide is continued or is replaced by an equipotential dose of torasemide (4:1). The study consists of two control visits (3 and 6 months after enrolment) with minimal follow-up of 6 months. Assessment involves clinical examination, Quality of Life Questionnaire, laboratory tests, echocardiography, electrocardiography, 24 h Holter-electrocardiography monitoring, 6 -min walk test and assessment of fluid retention. Any need for dose adjustment is assessed during the observation. The primary objective is to compare the effects of torasemide and furosemide on clinical and biochemical parameters of haemodynamic and neurohormonal compensation and myocardial remodelling. Secondary objectives include monitoring of: changes in signs and symptoms of heart failure, NYHA functional class, quality of life, dosage changes, rate of readmissions and mortality.
Despite decades of the diuretic's history, knowledge about diuretic therapy is still unsatisfactory. The most widely used diuretic, furosemide, has a stormy pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and is associated with a high risk of mortality and hospitalization for worsening heart failure. Reports are very encouraging and suggest beneficial effects of torasemide. Hence, there is a need for further studies of the overall effect of torasemide, compared with furosemide. This can translate into improved quality of life and better prognosis of patients with heart failure.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01942109 . Registered on 24 August 2013.
约50%的心力衰竭患者在6个月内会因病情恶化再次入院。因此,心力衰竭的症状性治疗需要显著改善。本研究的目的是比较托拉塞米和呋塞米对慢性心力衰竭患者血流动力学和神经激素代偿的生化参数、心肌重塑、临床结局及生活质量的影响。
这是一项多中心、随机、开放、双盲终点的IV期试验。该研究纳入120例纽约心脏病协会(NYHA)心功能II-IV级的心力衰竭患者,接受最佳心力衰竭治疗,有使用襻利尿剂的指征。入组时,患者病情稳定,襻利尿剂剂量固定。患者被随机分为接受呋塞米或托拉塞米治疗(随机比例1:1)。随机分组后,继续使用当前固定剂量的呋塞米或用等效应剂量的托拉塞米替代(4:1)。该研究包括两次对照访视(入组后3个月和6个月),最短随访6个月。评估包括临床检查、生活质量问卷、实验室检查、超声心动图、心电图、24小时动态心电图监测、6分钟步行试验及液体潴留评估。观察期间评估任何剂量调整的需求。主要目的是比较托拉塞米和呋塞米对血流动力学和神经激素代偿及心肌重塑的临床和生化参数的影响。次要目的包括监测:心力衰竭的体征和症状变化、NYHA心功能分级、生活质量、剂量变化、再次入院率和死亡率。
尽管利尿剂已有数十年的使用历史,但关于利尿剂治疗的知识仍不尽人意。使用最广泛的利尿剂呋塞米,其药代动力学和药效学波动较大,且与因心力衰竭恶化导致的高死亡率和住院风险相关。有关托拉塞米的报道非常令人鼓舞,提示其有益作用。因此,需要进一步研究托拉塞米与呋塞米相比的总体效果。这可以转化为改善心力衰竭患者的生活质量和更好的预后。
ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT01942109。于2013年8月24日注册。