• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

指令对负强化人类行为消退敏感性的影响。

The effects of instructions on the sensitivity of negatively reinforced human behavior to extinction.

作者信息

Alessandri Jérôme, Cançado Carlos R X

机构信息

University of Lille, CNRS, UMR 9193 - SCALab - Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, F-59000 Lille, France.

Universidade de Brasília, Brazil.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2017 Mar;136:50-53. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2017.01.009
PMID:28115183
Abstract

The effects of instructions on the sensitivity of negatively reinforced (escape) behavior to extinction were studied. Initially, responding produced timeouts from pressing a force cell on a variable-ratio (VR) schedule, which was then discontinued (extinction). Based on extinction data, participants were distributed into two groups. Participants in the Persistence Group (for which response rates were low in extinction) were instructed that the experimenter expected them to continue responding in extinction after a second exposure to the VR schedule. Participants in the Extinction group (for which response rates were high in extinction) were instructed that the experimenter expected them to stop responding in extinction. Relative to the condition in which instructions were absent, extinction-response rates increased and decreased, respectively, for participants in the Persistence and Extinction groups. These results replicate and extend to negatively reinforced responding previous findings that showed behavioral control by instructions formulated as explicit experimenter demands or expectations.

摘要

本研究探讨了指令对负强化(逃避)行为消退敏感性的影响。最初,被试的反应在可变比率(VR)程序下会导致按压测力传感器的行为暂停,随后该程序停止(进入消退阶段)。根据消退数据,将被试分为两组。持久性组的被试(在消退阶段反应率较低)被告知实验者期望他们在再次接触VR程序后在消退阶段继续做出反应。消退组的被试(在消退阶段反应率较高)被告知实验者期望他们在消退阶段停止反应。相对于无指令条件,持久性组和消退组被试的消退反应率分别增加和降低。这些结果重复并扩展了以往关于负强化反应的研究结果,即表明明确的实验者要求或期望所制定的指令能够控制行为。

相似文献

1
The effects of instructions on the sensitivity of negatively reinforced human behavior to extinction.指令对负强化人类行为消退敏感性的影响。
Behav Processes. 2017 Mar;136:50-53. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
2
The recurrence of negatively reinforced responding of humans.人类负强化反应的复发。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Nov;104(3):211-22. doi: 10.1002/jeab.178.
3
Effects of reinforcement value on instruction following under schedules of negative reinforcement.负强化程序下强化值对遵循指令的影响。
Behav Processes. 2017 Dec;145:27-30. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
4
Context affects resurgence of negatively reinforced human behavior.情境会影响负强化的人类行为的重现。
Behav Processes. 2020 Jan;170:104018. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.104018. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
5
Timeout postponement without increased reinforcement frequency.在不增加强化频率的情况下延迟超时。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Sep;74(2):147-64. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-147.
6
Human choice under schedules of negative reinforcement.负强化程序下的人类选择。
Behav Processes. 2015 Dec;121:70-3. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
7
Persistence during and resurgence following noncontingent reinforcement implemented with and without extinction.在实施非连续强化时及之后,无论有无消退情况下的持续性和恢复情况。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Apr;50(2):377-392. doi: 10.1002/jaba.380. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
8
To remove or not to remove? Removal of the unconditional stimulus electrode does not mediate instructed extinction effects.移除还是不移除?移除无条件刺激电极并不会介导指令性消退效应。
Psychophysiology. 2015 Sep;52(9):1248-56. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12452. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
9
Extinction of responding maintained by timeout from avoidance.由回避超时维持的反应消退。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Jan;71(1):1-11. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-1.
10
Induction, contrast, and resistance to extinction.诱导、对比和消退抗性。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jul;11(4):453-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-453.