Suppr超能文献

胰岛素甘精 300 单位/毫升和 100 单位/毫升在 1 型糖尿病成人中的比较:使用早晨或傍晚注射的连续血糖监测谱和变异性。

Comparison of Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL and 100 Units/mL in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles and Variability Using Morning or Evening Injections.

机构信息

Park Nicollet International Diabetes Center, Minneapolis, MN

AMCR Institute, Escondido, CA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2017 Apr;40(4):554-560. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0684. Epub 2017 Jan 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare glucose control in participants with type 1 diabetes receiving insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) or glargine 100 units/mL (Gla-100) in the morning or evening, in combination with mealtime insulin.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this 16-week, exploratory, open-label, parallel-group, two-period crossover study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01658579), 59 adults with type 1 diabetes were randomized (1:1:1:1) to once-daily Gla-300 or Gla-100 given in the morning or evening (with crossover in the injection schedule). The primary efficacy end point was the mean percentage of time in the target glucose range (80-140 mg/dL), as measured using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), during the last 2 weeks of each 8-week period. Additional end points included other CGM glycemic control parameters, hypoglycemia (per self-monitored plasma glucose [SMPG]), and adverse events.

RESULTS

The percentage of time within the target glucose range was comparable between the Gla-300 and Gla-100 groups. There was significantly less increase in CGM-based glucose during the last 4 h of the 24-h injection interval for Gla-300 compared with Gla-100 (least squares mean difference -14.7 mg/dL [95% CI -26.9 to -2.5]; = 0.0192). Mean 24-h glucose curves for the Gla-300 group were smoother (lower glycemic excursions), irrespective of morning or evening injection. Four metrics of intrasubject interstitial glucose variability showed no difference between Gla-300 and Gla-100. Nocturnal confirmed (<54 mg/dL by SMPG) or severe hypoglycemia rate was lower for Gla-300 participants than for Gla-100 participants (4.0 vs. 9.0 events per participant-year; rate ratio 0.45 [95% CI 0.24-0.82]).

CONCLUSIONS

Less increase in CGM-based glucose levels in the last 4 h of the 24-h injection interval, smoother average 24-h glucose profiles irrespective of injection time, and reduced nocturnal hypoglycemia were observed with Gla-300 versus Gla-100.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较接受甘精胰岛素 300 单位/毫升(Gla-300)或甘精胰岛素 100 单位/毫升(Gla-100)的 1 型糖尿病患者在早上或晚上接受胰岛素赖脯胰岛素治疗时的血糖控制情况。

研究设计和方法

这是一项为期 16 周、探索性、开放标签、平行组、两周期交叉研究(clinicaltrials.gov 标识符 NCT01658579),59 名 1 型糖尿病成人患者按 1:1:1:1 的比例随机(每天一次)接受 Gla-300 或 Gla-100 治疗,早上或晚上给药(注射方案交叉)。主要疗效终点是最后 2 周的平均目标血糖范围内时间百分比(80-140mg/dL),使用连续血糖监测(CGM)进行测量。其他 CGM 血糖控制参数、低血糖(自我监测血浆葡萄糖[SMPG])和不良事件也包括在内。

结果

Gla-300 和 Gla-100 组的目标血糖范围内时间百分比相当。与 Gla-100 相比,Gla-300 在 24 小时注射间隔的最后 4 小时内 CGM 检测的血糖升高幅度明显较小(最小二乘均值差异-14.7mg/dL[95%CI-26.9 至-2.5];=0.0192)。Gla-300 组的平均 24 小时血糖曲线更平稳(血糖波动较小),无论早上还是晚上注射。4 项个体间间质葡萄糖变异性指标显示 Gla-300 和 Gla-100 之间无差异。Gla-300 组夜间证实(SMPG<54mg/dL)或严重低血糖发生率低于 Gla-100 组(4.0 比 9.0 例/患者年;发生率比 0.45[95%CI0.24-0.82])。

结论

与 Gla-100 相比,Gla-300 在 24 小时注射间隔的最后 4 小时内 CGM 检测的血糖水平升高幅度较小,平均 24 小时血糖曲线更平稳,无论注射时间如何,夜间低血糖发生率降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验