Sieira Juan, Brugada Pedro
Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016;5(3):164-169. doi: 10.15420/aer.2016:22:3.
Since the first description of the Brugada syndrome (BS) in 1992, scientific progress in the understanding of this disease has been enormous; at the same time more and more individuals with the disease have been diagnosed. The profile of patients with BS has changed with more asymptomatic individuals and less expressive clinical features. Asymptomatic BS individuals are at lower arrhythmic risk than those presenting with syncope or sudden cardiac death (SCD). The event incidence rate is around 0.5 % per year; this figure is relevant due to the fact that individuals have a long life expectancy and are otherwise healthy. As a result of the risk of SCD, risk stratification is of utmost importance. As the implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator is the main treatment for those patients at higher risk, benefits and long-term potential risks have to be adequately considered. Some risk factors, such as spontaneous type 1 electrocardiogram (ECG) pattern, are widely accepted, whilst for others contradictory data are present. Furthermore, novel risk factors are now available that might help in the management of BS. The presence of a spontaneous type 1 ECG pattern, history of sinus node dysfunction and inducible ventricular arrhythmias during programmed electrical stimulation of the heart allow us to risk stratify these patients.
自1992年首次描述Brugada综合征(BS)以来,在对该疾病的认识方面取得了巨大的科学进展;与此同时,越来越多的该疾病患者得到诊断。BS患者的特征发生了变化,无症状个体增多,临床特征表现不典型。无症状的BS个体心律失常风险低于那些出现晕厥或心源性猝死(SCD)的个体。事件发生率约为每年0.5%;鉴于个体预期寿命长且其他方面健康,这一数字具有重要意义。由于存在SCD风险,风险分层至关重要。由于植入心脏复律除颤器是高危患者的主要治疗方法,因此必须充分考虑其益处和长期潜在风险。一些风险因素,如自发1型心电图(ECG)模式,已被广泛认可,而其他一些因素则存在相互矛盾的数据。此外,现在有新的风险因素可能有助于BS的管理。自发1型ECG模式的存在、窦房结功能障碍病史以及心脏程序性电刺激期间可诱发的室性心律失常,使我们能够对这些患者进行风险分层。