Suppr超能文献

生物样本库研究中的保密性:捐赠者与非捐赠者家庭对风险的理解比较

Confidentiality in Biobanking Research: A Comparison of Donor and Nondonor Families' Understanding of Risks.

作者信息

Siminoff Laura A, Wilson-Genderson Maureen, Mosavel Maghboeba, Barker Laura, Trgina Jennifer, Traino Heather M

机构信息

1 College of Public Health, Temple University , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

2 Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond, Virginia.

出版信息

Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2017 Mar;21(3):171-177. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0407. Epub 2017 Jan 25.

Abstract

AIMS

Confidentiality of personal identifiers potentially linking the genetic results from biobanking participants back to the donor and donor relatives is a concern. The risks associated with a breach of confidentiality should be ascertained when biobanks collect samples requiring the consent of a family decision maker (FDM) from deceased organ and tissue donors. This article explores FDM knowledge and opinions regarding risks associated with participation in biobanking research in the context of the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Project.

METHODS

Data collection included a survey completed by organ procurement organization requesters (n = 37) and semistructured telephone interviews with the FDMs (n = 85).

RESULTS

Donor families were more likely to know that there was a risk that a patient's identity could be revealed through a breach of confidentiality (p < 0.05). They also were more likely to understand that researchers using biobanked tissue would not have access to the patient's exact identity (p < 0.05). FDMs who refused donation were more concerned about risks than donors and reported lower levels of support for medical research in general. Finally, families were frequently interested in the return of results and willing to trade absolute confidentiality for participation.

CONCLUSIONS

Clear discussion of the risk of breach of confidentiality is needed during the consent process. The risk and benefit equation could be equalized if studies such as GTEx offered genomic results to interested participants.

摘要

目的

个人标识符的保密性可能会将生物样本库参与者的基因检测结果追溯到捐赠者及其亲属,这是一个令人担忧的问题。当生物样本库从已故器官和组织捐赠者那里收集需要家庭决策者(FDM)同意的样本时,应确定与保密性泄露相关的风险。本文探讨了在基因型-组织表达(GTEx)项目背景下,家庭决策者对于参与生物样本库研究相关风险的了解情况和看法。

方法

数据收集包括器官采购组织请求者完成的一项调查(n = 37)以及对家庭决策者进行的半结构化电话访谈(n = 85)。

结果

捐赠者家属更有可能知晓存在因保密性泄露而导致患者身份被揭露的风险(p < 0.05)。他们也更有可能理解使用生物样本库组织的研究人员无法获取患者的确切身份(p < 0.05)。拒绝捐赠的家庭决策者比捐赠者更担心风险,并且总体上对医学研究的支持程度较低。最后,家属通常对结果反馈感兴趣,并且愿意为参与而放弃绝对保密性。

结论

在同意过程中需要对保密性泄露的风险进行清晰的讨论。如果像GTEx这样的研究向感兴趣的参与者提供基因组结果,那么风险和收益的平衡可能会实现。

相似文献

1
Confidentiality in Biobanking Research: A Comparison of Donor and Nondonor Families' Understanding of Risks.
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2017 Mar;21(3):171-177. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0407. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
2
Family decision maker perspectives on the return of genetic results in biobanking research.
Genet Med. 2016 Jan;18(1):82-8. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.38. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
3
Authorization of tissues from deceased patients for genetic research.
Hum Genet. 2018 Jan;137(1):63-71. doi: 10.1007/s00439-017-1855-y. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
6
What Potential Donors in Research Biobanking Want to Know: A Large Population Study of the Italian Twin Registry.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2016 Dec;14(6):456-463. doi: 10.1089/bio.2016.0012. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
7
Making a family decision to donate the brain for genomic research: lessons from the genotype-tissue expression project (GTEx).
Cell Tissue Bank. 2021 Sep;22(3):431-441. doi: 10.1007/s10561-020-09890-9. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
8
Regulating biobanking with children's tissue: a legal analysis and the experts' view.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jan;24(1):30-6. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.59. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
9
Informed consent, biobank research, and locality: perceptions of breast cancer patients in three European countries.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Jul;9(3):48-55. doi: 10.1177/1556264614540600.

引用本文的文献

1
Ten simple rules for research with humans.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Aug 7;21(8):e1013362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013362. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Efficient Use of Biological Data in the Web 3.0 Era by Applying Nonfungible Token Technology.
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 28;26:e46160. doi: 10.2196/46160.
4
Current aspects in biobanking for personalized oncology investigations and treatments.
Med Pharm Rep. 2023 Jul;96(3):235-245. doi: 10.15386/mpr-2647. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
5
Public awareness and attitudes toward biobank and sample donation: A regional Chinese survey.
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 23;10:1025775. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1025775. eCollection 2022.
8
Responsiveness and adaptability in community engaged biobanking research: experiences from a Hispanic community.
J Community Genet. 2019 Jul;10(3):395-406. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0397-x. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
10
Broad Consent for Research on Biospecimens: The Views of Actual Donors at Four U.S. Medical Centers.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Apr;13(2):115-124. doi: 10.1177/1556264617751204. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the links between privacy and public data sharing.
Nat Methods. 2016 Mar;13(3):211-2. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3779.
2
Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):440-63. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12288.
3
Broad Consent for Research With Biological Samples: Workshop Conclusions.
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(9):34-42. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1062162.
5
Family decision maker perspectives on the return of genetic results in biobanking research.
Genet Med. 2016 Jan;18(1):82-8. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.38. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
6
Demographic differences in willingness to provide broad and narrow consent for biobank research.
Biopreserv Biobank. 2015 Apr;13(2):98-106. doi: 10.1089/bio.2014.0032. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
9
Identification of a variant in KDR associated with serum VEGFR2 and pharmacodynamics of Pazopanib.
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Jan 15;21(2):365-72. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1683. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
10
Public preferences for the return of research results in genetic research: a conjoint analysis.
Genet Med. 2014 Dec;16(12):932-9. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.50. Epub 2014 May 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验