• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Ten simple rules for research with humans.

作者信息

Coates Madeline K, Sava Tudor V, Tashjian Sarah M

机构信息

Melbourne School of Psychological Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Melbourne Brain Centre Imaging Unit, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Aug 7;21(8):e1013362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013362. eCollection 2025 Aug.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013362
PMID:40773439
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12331102/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aae4/12331102/9c7f65d4c69c/pcbi.1013362.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aae4/12331102/9c7f65d4c69c/pcbi.1013362.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aae4/12331102/9c7f65d4c69c/pcbi.1013362.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Ten simple rules for research with humans.关于人体研究的十条简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Aug 7;21(8):e1013362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013362. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Risk scores to guide referral decisions for people with suspected ovarian cancer in secondary care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.风险评分在二级医疗机构中指导疑似卵巢癌患者转诊决策的应用：系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Aug;22(44):1-264. doi: 10.3310/hta22440.
3
Systematic review and validation of prediction rules for identifying children with serious infections in emergency departments and urgent-access primary care.系统评价和验证预测规则，以识别急诊科和紧急初级保健中严重感染的儿童。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(15):1-100. doi: 10.3310/hta16150.
4
Selective testing strategies for diagnosing group A streptococcal infection in children with pharyngitis: a systematic review and prospective multicentre external validation study.诊断咽炎患儿A组链球菌感染的选择性检测策略：一项系统评价和前瞻性多中心外部验证研究
CMAJ. 2015 Jan 6;187(1):23-32. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.140772. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
5
The performance of risk prediction models for pre-eclampsia using routinely collected maternal characteristics and comparison with models that include specialised tests and with clinical guideline decision rules: a systematic review.基于常规收集的孕产妇特征对先兆子痫进行风险预测模型的性能评估，以及与包括专科检查和临床指南决策规则的模型进行比较：系统评价。
BJOG. 2016 Aug;123(9):1441-52. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14029. Epub 2016 May 26.
6
Clinical decision rules for children with minor head injury: a systematic review.儿童轻微头部损伤的临床决策规则：系统评价。
Arch Dis Child. 2011 May;96(5):414-21. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.202820. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
7
External validation of ultrasound-based models for differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal masses: a nationwide prospective multicenter study (IOTA phase 6).基于超声的附件包块良恶性鉴别模型的外部验证：一项全国性前瞻性多中心研究（IOTA 第6阶段）
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.07.017.
8
Different Resuscitation Termination Criteria for Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest; A Prognostic Accuracy Study.院外心脏骤停不同的复苏终止标准：一项预后准确性研究。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Jun 28;13(1):e59. doi: 10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2656. eCollection 2025.
9
Diagnostic management strategies for adults and children with minor head injury: a systematic review and an economic evaluation.成人和儿童轻微头部损伤的诊断管理策略：系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Aug;15(27):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta15270.
10
Customizing Computerized Adaptive Test Stopping Rules for Clinical Settings Using the Negative Affect Subdomain of the NIH Toolbox Emotion Battery: Simulation Study.使用美国国立卫生研究院工具箱情绪量表的消极情绪子领域为临床环境定制计算机自适应测试停止规则：模拟研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 21;9:e60215. doi: 10.2196/60215.

本文引用的文献

1
What research participants say about their research experiences in Empowering the Participant Voice: Outcomes and actionable data.研究参与者对他们在“增强参与者声音：成果与可操作数据”中的研究经历有何看法。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jan 10;9(1):e43. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.3. eCollection 2025.
2
Research Participants' Engagement and Retention in Digital Health Interventions Research: Protocol for Mixed Methods Systematic Review.数字健康干预研究中研究参与者的参与度与留存率：混合方法系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 3;14:e65099. doi: 10.2196/65099.
3
The Stakeholders' Involvement in Healthcare 4.0 Services Provision: The Perspective of Co-Creation.
利益相关者在医疗保健 4.0 服务提供中的参与：共创的视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 29;20(3):2416. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032416.
4
Recruitment and retention into longitudinal health research from an adolescent perspective: a qualitative study.从青少年视角招募和保留参与纵向健康研究：一项定性研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jan 16;23(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01802-7.
5
Retaining Participants in Longitudinal Studies of Alzheimer's Disease.在阿尔茨海默病纵向研究中留住参与者
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;87(2):945-955. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215710.
6
Emotional distress among frontline research staff.一线研究人员的情绪困扰。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jul;281:114101. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114101. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
7
Talk to us! Communication is a key factor in improving the comfort of MRI research participants.与我们交流！沟通是提高 MRI 研究参与者舒适度的关键因素。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1137-1144. doi: 10.1111/hex.13217. Epub 2021 May 5.
8
The future of digital health with federated learning.联合学习助力数字健康的未来。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Sep 14;3:119. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1. eCollection 2020.
9
Factors Associated With Virtual Reality Sickness in Head-Mounted Displays: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.头戴式显示器中与虚拟现实疾病相关的因素：系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Mar 31;14:96. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00096. eCollection 2020.
10
Toward clinical digital phenotyping: a timely opportunity to consider purpose, quality, and safety.迈向临床数字表型分析：一个考虑目的、质量和安全性的适时机遇。
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Sep 6;2:88. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0166-1. eCollection 2019.