Chen Ping, Yu Wenbin, Huang Junwei, Xu Hongbo, Li Guojun, Chen Xiaohong, Huang Zhigang
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100730, China.
Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Head and Neck surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China.
Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 28;8(9):14770-14776. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14772.
To compare survival outcomes between patients with poorly differentiated versus well-differentiated glottic squamous cell carcinoma (GSCC). Fifty-five patients with well-differentiated newly diagnosed GSCC were pair-matched to 55 patients with poorly differentiated GSCC according to age, sex, year of diagnosis, overall stage, treatment (surgery type, neck dissection, surgical margin, and chemoradiation), smoking, and alcohol use. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and matched-pair survival was estimated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Patients with well-differentiated GSCC had significantly better overall survival (OS) (P = 0.001), disease-specific survival (DSS) (P < 0.001), and disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.003) than patients with poorly differentiated GSCC. Moreover, matched-pair analysis indicated that increased differentiation was associated with a significantly reduced risk of overall death (HR, 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.46), death owing to disease (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05-0.45), and disease recurrence (HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.07-0.41), and these risks were reduced approximately 4-fold, 3.7-fold, and 9-fold, respectively, after adjustment for cancer-associated variables. Survival differed significantly between the well-differentiated and poorly differentiated GSCC patients after adjustment for cancer prognosis-associated variables. Thus, identifying potential differences in the molecular characteristics between these two groups of patients would help to further stratify these patients and ensure appropriate individualized treatment decisions. Basing treatment strategies on the level of differentiation may improve survival.
比较高分化与低分化声门鳞状细胞癌(GSCC)患者的生存结局。根据年龄、性别、诊断年份、总体分期、治疗(手术类型、颈部清扫、手术切缘和放化疗)、吸烟和饮酒情况,将55例新诊断的高分化GSCC患者与55例低分化GSCC患者进行配对。采用Kaplan-Meier估计法进行生存分析,并使用Cox比例风险回归模型估计配对生存情况。高分化GSCC患者的总生存期(OS)(P = 0.001)、疾病特异性生存期(DSS)(P < 0.001)和无病生存期(DFS)(P = 0.003)均显著优于低分化GSCC患者。此外,配对分析表明,分化程度增加与总死亡风险(HR,0.18;95%置信区间[CI],0.07 - 0.46)、疾病导致的死亡风险(HR,0.16;95% CI,0.05 - 0.45)和疾病复发风险(HR,0.17;95% CI,0.07 - 0.41)显著降低相关,在对癌症相关变量进行调整后,这些风险分别降低了约4倍、3.7倍和9倍。在对癌症预后相关变量进行调整后,高分化和低分化GSCC患者的生存情况存在显著差异。因此,识别这两组患者分子特征的潜在差异将有助于进一步对这些患者进行分层,并确保做出适当的个体化治疗决策。基于分化程度制定治疗策略可能会提高生存率。