• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良序贯器官功能评估评分在资源受限环境中的可行性:一项前瞻性观察性研究

Feasibility of the modified sequential organ function assessment score in a resource-constrained setting: a prospective observational study.

作者信息

Sendagire Cornelius, Lipnick Michael S, Kizito Sam, Kruisselbrink Rebecca, Obua Daniel, Ejoku Joseph, Ssemogerere Lameck, Nakibuuka Jane, Kwizera Arthur

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and critical care,, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.

San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, 1001 Potrero, 3C24, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0304-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12871-017-0304-8
PMID:28122489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5267406/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sub-Saharan Africa has a great burden of critical illness with limited health care resources. We evaluated the feasibility and utility of the modified Sequential Organ Function Assessment (mSOFA) score in assessing morbidity and mortality in the National Referral Hospital's intensive care unit (ICU) for one year.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study on patients above 12 years of age admitted to the ICU at Mulago Hospital (Kampala, Uganda). All SOFA scores were determined at admission and at 48 h. We modified the SOFA score by replacing the PaO/FiO ratio with SPO/FiO. The primary outcome was ICU mortality.

RESULTS

This ICU cohort of 118 patients had a mean age of 37 years and an ICU mortality rate of 46.6%. Non-survivors had higher initial (7.7 SD 3.8 vs. 5.5 SD 3.3; p = 0.007), mean (8.1 SD 3.9 vs 4.7 SD 2.6; p < 0.001) and highest mSOFA scores (9.4 SD 4.2 vs. 5.8 SD 3.2; p < 0.001), with an increase of 1.0 (SD 3.1) mSOFA on average after 48 h when compared to survivors (p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for each mSOFA category was: initial-0.68, mean-0.76, highest-0.76 and delta mSOFA-0.74. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed no significant association between mSOFA scores and mortality.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm that calculation of the mSOFA score is feasible for an ICU population in a resource-limited country. More data are needed to test for an association between mSOFA and mortality.

摘要

背景

撒哈拉以南非洲地区面临着重大疾病负担,且卫生保健资源有限。我们评估了改良序贯器官功能评估(mSOFA)评分在一家国家级转诊医院重症监护病房(ICU)评估发病率和死亡率方面的可行性及实用性,为期一年。

方法

我们对穆拉戈医院(乌干达坎帕拉)ICU收治的12岁以上患者进行了一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。所有SOFA评分均在入院时及48小时时测定。我们通过用SPO/FiO替代PaO/FiO比值来改良SOFA评分。主要结局为ICU死亡率。

结果

该ICU队列中的118名患者平均年龄为37岁,ICU死亡率为46.6%。非幸存者的初始(7.7±3.8 vs. 5.5±3.3;p = 0.007)、平均(8.1±3.9 vs 4.7±2.6;p < 0.001)和最高mSOFA评分更高(9.4±4.2 vs. 5.8±3.2;p < 0.001),与幸存者相比,48小时后平均mSOFA增加1.0(±3.1)(p < 0.001)。每个mSOFA类别在受试者工作特征曲线下的面积分别为:初始-0.68、平均-0.76、最高-0.76和mSOFA差值-0.74。多因素逻辑回归分析显示mSOFA评分与死亡率之间无显著关联。

结论

我们的结果证实,对于资源有限国家的ICU人群,计算mSOFA评分是可行的。需要更多数据来检验mSOFA与死亡率之间的关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3531/5267406/0de885a31b0c/12871_2017_304_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3531/5267406/0b753ae93ddd/12871_2017_304_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3531/5267406/f8d6258e6aac/12871_2017_304_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3531/5267406/0de885a31b0c/12871_2017_304_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3531/5267406/0b753ae93ddd/12871_2017_304_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3531/5267406/f8d6258e6aac/12871_2017_304_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3531/5267406/0de885a31b0c/12871_2017_304_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Feasibility of the modified sequential organ function assessment score in a resource-constrained setting: a prospective observational study.改良序贯器官功能评估评分在资源受限环境中的可行性:一项前瞻性观察性研究
BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0304-8.
2
Comparison of Proposed Modified and Original Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scores in Predicting ICU Mortality: A Prospective, Observational, Follow-Up Study.比较改良后的序贯器官衰竭评估评分与原始评分在预测重症监护病房死亡率中的作用:一项前瞻性观察性随访研究。
Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:7379325. doi: 10.1155/2016/7379325. Epub 2016 Dec 25.
3
Impact and Progression of Organ Dysfunction in Patients with Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: A Multicenter Study.坏死性软组织感染患者器官功能障碍的影响与进展:一项多中心研究
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Dec;16(6):694-701. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.098. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
4
Multicenter International Cohort Validation of a Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Using the Richmond Agitation-sedation Scale.多中心国际队列验证使用 Richmond 躁动-镇静评分修改的序贯器官衰竭评估评分。
Ann Surg. 2022 Aug 1;276(2):e114-e119. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004484. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
5
A modified sequential organ failure assessment score for critical care triage.改良的序贯器官衰竭评估评分用于重症监护分诊。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010 Dec;4(4):277-84. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2010.40.
6
Clinical outcome prediction of acute neurological patients admitted to the emergency department: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and modified SOFA score.急诊急性神经科患者的临床预后预测:序贯器官衰竭评估评分和改良 SOFA 评分。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 30;11:1264159. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1264159. eCollection 2023.
7
Ability of a modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score to predict mortality among sepsis patients in a resource-limited setting.改良序贯器官衰竭评估评分预测资源有限环境下脓毒症患者死亡率的能力。
Acute Crit Care. 2022 Aug;37(3):363-371. doi: 10.4266/acc.2021.01627. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
8
Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients.序贯评估序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分以预测危重症患者的预后
JAMA. 2001 Oct 10;286(14):1754-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.14.1754.
9
A modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for dengue: development, evaluation and proposal for use in clinical trials.改良的登革热序贯器官衰竭评估评分:研发、评估及临床试验应用建议。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 3;22(1):722. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07705-8.
10
Predictive performance of the SOFA and mSOFA scoring systems for predicting in-hospital mortality in the emergency department.SOFA 和 mSOFA 评分系统对急诊科住院患者病死率预测的预测性能。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;37(7):1237-1241. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of emergency physician opinions with MSOFA and PREMEWS scores in determining the necessity of non-traumatic internal medicine patient transfers to the emergency department: a longitudinal study.比较急诊医生意见与MSOFA和PREMEWS评分在确定非创伤性内科患者转入急诊科必要性方面的差异:一项纵向研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 12;25(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01215-x.
2
External validation of a modified cardiovascular sequential organ failure assessment score in patients with suspected infection using the MIMIC-IV database.使用 MIMIC-IV 数据库对疑似感染患者的改良心血管序贯器官衰竭评估评分进行外部验证。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 12;19(11):e0312185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312185. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) Identifies Critical Illness among Ward Patients in a Resource Restricted Setting in Kampala, Uganda: A Prospective Observational Study.改良早期预警评分(MEWS)在乌干达坎帕拉资源受限环境下识别病房患者中的危重症:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0151408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151408. eCollection 2016.
2
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
3
Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).
Characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to intensive care units in Uganda: a descriptive nationwide multicentre prospective study.
乌干达重症监护病房患者的特征和结局:一项全国范围多中心前瞻性描述性研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 30;14(1):9963. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59031-5.
4
Derivation and validation of a screening tool for stroke-associated sepsis.一种用于卒中相关性脓毒症的筛查工具的推导与验证
Neurol Res Pract. 2023 Jul 13;5(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s42466-023-00258-4.
5
Results from the first audit of an intensive care unit in Botswana.博茨瓦纳一家重症监护病房首次审计的结果。
South Afr J Crit Care. 2020 Jul 30;36(1). doi: 10.7196/SAJCC.2020.v36i1.395. eCollection 2020.
6
The Diagnostic Value of Cerebrospinal Fluid Lactate for Detection of Sepsis in Community-Acquired Bacterial Meningitis.脑脊液乳酸盐对社区获得性细菌性脑膜炎败血症检测的诊断价值
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 31;13(7):1313. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13071313.
7
Liver diseases as a novel risk factor for delirium in the ICU-Delirium and hepatic encephalopathy are two distinct entities.肝脏疾病作为 ICU 患者谵妄的新危险因素——谵妄和肝性脑病是两个不同的实体。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 22;17(11):e0276914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276914. eCollection 2022.
8
Pembrolizumab in combination with tocilizumab in high-risk hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (COPERNICO): A randomized proof-of-concept phase II study.帕博利珠单抗联合托珠单抗治疗 COVID-19(COPERNICO)高危住院患者:一项随机概念验证 II 期研究。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Oct;123:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.08.007. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
9
Ability of a modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score to predict mortality among sepsis patients in a resource-limited setting.改良序贯器官衰竭评估评分预测资源有限环境下脓毒症患者死亡率的能力。
Acute Crit Care. 2022 Aug;37(3):363-371. doi: 10.4266/acc.2021.01627. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
10
Sepsis in Patients With Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke-Clinical Characteristics and Outcome.大血管闭塞性卒中患者的脓毒症——临床特征与结局
Front Neurol. 2022 Jul 12;13:902809. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.902809. eCollection 2022.
制定脓毒性休克的新定义并评估新的临床标准:用于第三次脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际共识定义(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):775-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289.
4
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
5
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in defining severe sepsis.全身性炎症反应综合征标准在严重脓毒症中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 23;372(17):1629-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415236. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
6
National intensive care unit bed capacity and ICU patient characteristics in a low income country.低收入国家的国家重症监护病房床位容量及重症监护病房患者特征
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Sep 1;5:475. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-475.
7
Clinical review: International comparisons in critical care - lessons learned.临床综述:重症监护领域的国际比较——经验教训
Crit Care. 2012 Dec 12;16(2):218. doi: 10.1186/cc11140.
8
A modified sequential organ failure assessment score for critical care triage.改良的序贯器官衰竭评估评分用于重症监护分诊。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010 Dec;4(4):277-84. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2010.40.
9
Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults.重症监护和成人重症疾病的全球负担。
Lancet. 2010 Oct 16;376(9749):1339-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60446-1. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
10
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for predicting outcome in patients with severe sepsis and evidence of hypoperfusion at the time of emergency department presentation.序贯器官衰竭评估评分用于预测急诊科就诊时患有严重脓毒症且有低灌注证据患者的预后。
Crit Care Med. 2009 May;37(5):1649-54. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819def97.