• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较改良后的序贯器官衰竭评估评分与原始评分在预测重症监护病房死亡率中的作用:一项前瞻性观察性随访研究。

Comparison of Proposed Modified and Original Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scores in Predicting ICU Mortality: A Prospective, Observational, Follow-Up Study.

作者信息

Gholipour Baradari Afshin, Sharifi Hassan, Firouzian Abolfazl, Daneshiyan Maryam, Aarabi Mohsen, Talebiyan Kiakolaye Yaser, Nouraei Seyed Mahmood, Zamani Kiasari Alieh, Habibi Mohammad Reza, Emami Zeydi Amir, Sadeghi Faegheh

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.

Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iranshahr University of Medical Sciences, Iranshahr, Iran.

出版信息

Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:7379325. doi: 10.1155/2016/7379325. Epub 2016 Dec 25.

DOI:10.1155/2016/7379325
PMID:28116220
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5220525/
Abstract

. The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score has been recommended to triage critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to compare the performance of our proposed MSOFA and original SOFA scores in predicting ICU mortality. . This prospective observational study was conducted on 250 patients admitted to the ICU. Both tools scores were calculated at the beginning, 24 hours of ICU admission, and 48 hours of ICU admission. Diagnostic odds ratio and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to compare the two scores. . MSOFA and SOFA predicted mortality similarly with an area under the ROC curve of 0.837, 0.992, and 0.977 for MSOFA 1, MSOFA 2, and MSOFA 3, respectively, and 0.857, 0.988, and 0.988 for SOFA 1, SOFA 2, and SOFA 3, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of MSOFA 1 in cut-off point 8 were 82.9% and 68.4%, respectively, MSOFA 2 in cut-off point 9.5 were 94.7% and 97.1%, respectively, and MSOFA 3 in cut-off point of 9.3 were 97.4% and 93.1%, respectively. There was a significant positive correlation between the MSOFA 1 and the SOFA 1 (: 0.942), 24 hours (: 0.972), and 48 hours (: 0.960). . The proposed MSOFA and the SOFA scores had high diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for predicting mortality.

摘要

序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分已被推荐用于对重症监护病房(ICU)的危重症患者进行分诊。本研究旨在比较我们提出的改良序贯器官衰竭评估(MSOFA)评分和原始SOFA评分在预测ICU死亡率方面的表现。 这项前瞻性观察性研究对250名入住ICU的患者进行。在入住ICU开始时、入住24小时和48小时时计算两种工具的评分。使用诊断比值比和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线来比较这两个评分。 MSOFA和SOFA对死亡率的预测相似,MSOFA 1、MSOFA 2和MSOFA 3的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.837、0.992和0.977,SOFA 1、SOFA 2和SOFA 3的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.857、0.988和0.988。MSOFA 1在截断点为8时的敏感性和特异性分别为82.9%和68.4%,MSOFA 2在截断点为9.5时的敏感性和特异性分别为94.7%和97.1%,MSOFA 3在截断点为9.3时的敏感性和特异性分别为97.4%和93.1%。MSOFA 1与SOFA 1(r = 0.942)、24小时(r = 0.972)和48小时(r = 0.960)之间存在显著正相关。 提出的MSOFA评分和SOFA评分在预测死亡率方面具有较高的诊断准确性、敏感性和特异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca51/5220525/a516fb56a946/SCIENTIFICA2016-7379325.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca51/5220525/a516fb56a946/SCIENTIFICA2016-7379325.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca51/5220525/a516fb56a946/SCIENTIFICA2016-7379325.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Proposed Modified and Original Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scores in Predicting ICU Mortality: A Prospective, Observational, Follow-Up Study.比较改良后的序贯器官衰竭评估评分与原始评分在预测重症监护病房死亡率中的作用:一项前瞻性观察性随访研究。
Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:7379325. doi: 10.1155/2016/7379325. Epub 2016 Dec 25.
2
A modified sequential organ failure assessment score for critical care triage.改良的序贯器官衰竭评估评分用于重症监护分诊。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010 Dec;4(4):277-84. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2010.40.
3
Clinical outcome prediction of acute neurological patients admitted to the emergency department: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and modified SOFA score.急诊急性神经科患者的临床预后预测:序贯器官衰竭评估评分和改良 SOFA 评分。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 30;11:1264159. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1264159. eCollection 2023.
4
Ability of a modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score to predict mortality among sepsis patients in a resource-limited setting.改良序贯器官衰竭评估评分预测资源有限环境下脓毒症患者死亡率的能力。
Acute Crit Care. 2022 Aug;37(3):363-371. doi: 10.4266/acc.2021.01627. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
5
Feasibility of the modified sequential organ function assessment score in a resource-constrained setting: a prospective observational study.改良序贯器官功能评估评分在资源受限环境中的可行性:一项前瞻性观察性研究
BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0304-8.
6
Investigating the Utility of the SOFA Score and Creating a Modified SOFA Score for Predicting Mortality in the Intensive Care Units in a Tertiary Hospital in Jordan.探讨序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的效用并创建改良的SOFA评分以预测约旦一家三级医院重症监护病房的死亡率。
Crit Care Res Pract. 2023 Aug 7;2023:3775670. doi: 10.1155/2023/3775670. eCollection 2023.
7
COMPARISON OF PATIENTS' ADMISSION, MEAN AND HIGHEST SOFA SCORES IN PREDICTION OF ICU MORTALITY: A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY.比较患者入住时、平均及最高序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分对重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率的预测价值:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Mater Sociomed. 2016 Oct;28(5):343-347. doi: 10.5455/msm.2016.28.343-347. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
8
Predictive performance of the SOFA and mSOFA scoring systems for predicting in-hospital mortality in the emergency department.SOFA 和 mSOFA 评分系统对急诊科住院患者病死率预测的预测性能。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;37(7):1237-1241. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
9
Comparing the Ability and Accuracy of mSOFA, qSOFA, and qSOFA-65 in Predicting the Status of Nontraumatic Patients Referred to a Hospital Emergency Department: A Prospective Study.比较序贯器官衰竭评估(mSOFA)、快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)和年龄≥65岁患者的快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA-65)预测非创伤性患者转诊至医院急诊科时病情状况的能力和准确性:一项前瞻性研究。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;24(11):1045-1050. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23656.
10
Multicenter International Cohort Validation of a Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Using the Richmond Agitation-sedation Scale.多中心国际队列验证使用 Richmond 躁动-镇静评分修改的序贯器官衰竭评估评分。
Ann Surg. 2022 Aug 1;276(2):e114-e119. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004484. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Respiratory support with standard low-flow oxygen therapy, high-flow oxygen therapy or continuous positive airway pressure in adults with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure in a resource-limited setting: protocol for a randomised, open-label, clinical trial - the Acute Respiratory Intervention StudiEs in Africa (ARISE-AFRICA) study.在资源有限的环境下,成人急性低氧性呼吸衰竭时使用标准低流量氧疗、高流量氧疗或持续气道正压通气进行呼吸支持:一项随机、开放标签、临床试验的方案 - 非洲急性呼吸干预研究(ARISE-AFRICA)。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 1;14(6):e082223. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082223.
2
Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score vs. Early Warning Scores in Prehospital Care to Predict Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Acute Cardiovascular Disease.改良序贯器官衰竭评估评分与院前护理中的早期预警评分在预测急性心血管疾病主要不良心脏事件中的比较
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Feb 17;10(2):88. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10020088.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A modified prognostic score for critically ill patients with cirrhosis: An observational study.一种针对肝硬化重症患者的改良预后评分:一项观察性研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Feb;31(2):450-8. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13076.
2
Sequential organ failure assessment score for evaluating organ failure and outcome of severe maternal morbidity in obstetric intensive care.用于评估产科重症监护中器官功能衰竭及严重孕产妇发病结局的序贯器官衰竭评估评分
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:172145. doi: 10.1100/2012/172145. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
3
A modified sequential organ failure assessment score for critical care triage.
Risk factors for unfavorable clinical outcomes in patients with brain abscess in South Korea.韩国脑脓肿患者不良临床结局的危险因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 20;16(9):e0257541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257541. eCollection 2021.
4
The SOFA score-development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials.SOFA 评分的发展、在临床试验中准确评估的效用和挑战。
Crit Care. 2019 Nov 27;23(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2663-7.
5
Minor Head Trauma and its Short-term Outcomes Among Elderly Patients: a Prospective Epidemiological Study in North of Iran.老年患者的轻度头部创伤及其短期预后:伊朗北部的一项前瞻性流行病学研究
Mater Sociomed. 2019 Sep;31(3):186-189. doi: 10.5455/msm.2019.31.186-189.
6
Prognostic Value of Cardiac Troponin I and T on Admission in Mortality of Multiple Trauma Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department: a Prospective Follow-up Study.急诊科收治的多发伤患者入院时心肌肌钙蛋白I和T对死亡率的预后价值:一项前瞻性随访研究
Med Arch. 2019 Feb;73(1):11-14. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2019.73.11-14.
7
Development a Reverse Triage System Based on Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Increasing the Critical Care Surge Capacity.基于改良序贯器官衰竭评估法开发反向分诊系统以提高重症护理应对能力。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2018 Aug;22(8):575-579. doi: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_47_18.
改良的序贯器官衰竭评估评分用于重症监护分诊。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2010 Dec;4(4):277-84. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2010.40.
4
Severity of illness scoring systems in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房的疾病严重程度评分系统。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Jan;39(1):163-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f96f81.
5
Serial evaluation of SOFA score in a Brazilian teaching hospital.巴西教学医院中 SOFA 评分的连续评估。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2010 Apr;26(2):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
6
Evaluation of SOFA-based models for predicting mortality in the ICU: A systematic review.评估基于序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)的模型预测重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率:一项系统评价。
Crit Care. 2008;12(6):R161. doi: 10.1186/cc7160. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
7
A modified sequential organ failure assessment score to predict hospital mortality of postoperative acute renal failure patients requiring renal replacement therapy.一种改良的序贯器官衰竭评估评分,用于预测需要肾脏替代治疗的术后急性肾衰竭患者的医院死亡率。
Blood Purif. 2008;26(6):547-54. doi: 10.1159/000178771. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
8
Application of "the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score" in predicting outcome in ICU patients with SIRS.“序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分”在预测重症监护病房(ICU)中全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)患者预后方面的应用。
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2007 Oct-Dec;5(4):475-83.
9
Severity of illness and organ failure assessment in adult intensive care units.成人重症监护病房的疾病严重程度和器官功能衰竭评估
Crit Care Clin. 2007 Jul;23(3):639-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2007.05.004.
10
Causes of death and determinants of outcome in critically ill patients.危重症患者的死亡原因及预后决定因素
Crit Care. 2006;10(6):R154. doi: 10.1186/cc5086.