Department of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 12;19(11):e0312185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312185. eCollection 2024.
We developed a modified cardiovascular (CV) Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score using an emergency department-based cohort data, incorporating norepinephrine equivalent dose and lactate to represent current clinical practice patterns for vasopressor utilization and the diagnostic significance of lactate, respectively. In this study, we sought to validate this modified CV-SOFA score in intensive care unit patients with suspected infection using the Marketplace for Medical Information in Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database. This was a retrospective study that utilized data from the MIMIC-IV database. Modified CV/total SOFA score and original CV/total SOFA score were compared for predicting in-hospital mortality. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the calibration curve were employed to evaluate discrimination and calibration, respectively. A total of 29,618 ICU patients with suspected infections was analyzed. The in-hospital mortality rate was 12.4% (n = 3,675). Modified CV-SOFA score (AUROC 0.667; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.657-0.677 vs. 0.663; 95% CI 0.654-0.673; p = 0.283) and modified total SOFA score (0.784 [95% CI 0.776-0.793] vs. 0.785 [95% CI 0.777-0.793], p = 0.490) did not differ significantly from the original CV-SOFA score and original total SOFA score, respectively. The calibration curve of the original CV-SOFA score was inferior to that of the modified CV-SOFA score. The modified CV- and total SOFA scores were better calibrated than the original CV- and total SOFA scores, but their discriminative performance was not significantly different. Further studies of the modified CV-SOFA score in different settings and populations are required to assess the generalizability of this score.
我们使用基于急诊部的队列数据开发了改良的心血管(CV)序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分,其中纳入去甲肾上腺素等效剂量和乳酸,分别代表目前血管加压药利用的临床实践模式和乳酸的诊断意义。在这项研究中,我们试图使用市场上的医疗信息重症监护(MIMIC)-IV 数据库中的感染疑似患者的 ICU 患者数据来验证这种改良的 CV-SOFA 评分。这是一项回顾性研究,利用了 MIMIC-IV 数据库的数据。比较了改良的 CV/总 SOFA 评分和原始的 CV/总 SOFA 评分,以预测院内死亡率。使用接受者操作特征曲线(AUROC)下面积和校准曲线分别评估区分度和校准度。共分析了 29618 例感染疑似 ICU 患者。院内死亡率为 12.4%(n=3675)。改良的 CV-SOFA 评分(AUROC 0.667;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.657-0.677 与 0.663;95%CI 0.654-0.673;p=0.283)和改良的总 SOFA 评分(0.784 [95%CI 0.776-0.793] 与 0.785 [95%CI 0.777-0.793],p=0.490)与原始的 CV-SOFA 评分和原始的总 SOFA 评分没有显著差异。原始 CV-SOFA 评分的校准曲线劣于改良的 CV-SOFA 评分。改良的 CV 和总 SOFA 评分比原始 CV 和总 SOFA 评分具有更好的校准,但它们的区分性能没有显著差异。需要在不同的环境和人群中进一步研究改良的 CV-SOFA 评分,以评估该评分的普遍性。