• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 MIMIC-IV 数据库对疑似感染患者的改良心血管序贯器官衰竭评估评分进行外部验证。

External validation of a modified cardiovascular sequential organ failure assessment score in patients with suspected infection using the MIMIC-IV database.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Digital Health, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Nov 12;19(11):e0312185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312185. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0312185
PMID:39531422
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11556716/
Abstract

We developed a modified cardiovascular (CV) Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score using an emergency department-based cohort data, incorporating norepinephrine equivalent dose and lactate to represent current clinical practice patterns for vasopressor utilization and the diagnostic significance of lactate, respectively. In this study, we sought to validate this modified CV-SOFA score in intensive care unit patients with suspected infection using the Marketplace for Medical Information in Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database. This was a retrospective study that utilized data from the MIMIC-IV database. Modified CV/total SOFA score and original CV/total SOFA score were compared for predicting in-hospital mortality. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the calibration curve were employed to evaluate discrimination and calibration, respectively. A total of 29,618 ICU patients with suspected infections was analyzed. The in-hospital mortality rate was 12.4% (n = 3,675). Modified CV-SOFA score (AUROC 0.667; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.657-0.677 vs. 0.663; 95% CI 0.654-0.673; p = 0.283) and modified total SOFA score (0.784 [95% CI 0.776-0.793] vs. 0.785 [95% CI 0.777-0.793], p = 0.490) did not differ significantly from the original CV-SOFA score and original total SOFA score, respectively. The calibration curve of the original CV-SOFA score was inferior to that of the modified CV-SOFA score. The modified CV- and total SOFA scores were better calibrated than the original CV- and total SOFA scores, but their discriminative performance was not significantly different. Further studies of the modified CV-SOFA score in different settings and populations are required to assess the generalizability of this score.

摘要

我们使用基于急诊部的队列数据开发了改良的心血管(CV)序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分,其中纳入去甲肾上腺素等效剂量和乳酸,分别代表目前血管加压药利用的临床实践模式和乳酸的诊断意义。在这项研究中,我们试图使用市场上的医疗信息重症监护(MIMIC)-IV 数据库中的感染疑似患者的 ICU 患者数据来验证这种改良的 CV-SOFA 评分。这是一项回顾性研究,利用了 MIMIC-IV 数据库的数据。比较了改良的 CV/总 SOFA 评分和原始的 CV/总 SOFA 评分,以预测院内死亡率。使用接受者操作特征曲线(AUROC)下面积和校准曲线分别评估区分度和校准度。共分析了 29618 例感染疑似 ICU 患者。院内死亡率为 12.4%(n=3675)。改良的 CV-SOFA 评分(AUROC 0.667;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.657-0.677 与 0.663;95%CI 0.654-0.673;p=0.283)和改良的总 SOFA 评分(0.784 [95%CI 0.776-0.793] 与 0.785 [95%CI 0.777-0.793],p=0.490)与原始的 CV-SOFA 评分和原始的总 SOFA 评分没有显著差异。原始 CV-SOFA 评分的校准曲线劣于改良的 CV-SOFA 评分。改良的 CV 和总 SOFA 评分比原始 CV 和总 SOFA 评分具有更好的校准,但它们的区分性能没有显著差异。需要在不同的环境和人群中进一步研究改良的 CV-SOFA 评分,以评估该评分的普遍性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ee/11556716/15bdb732fcb6/pone.0312185.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ee/11556716/4ce9661fb7a0/pone.0312185.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ee/11556716/77721ee685ac/pone.0312185.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ee/11556716/15bdb732fcb6/pone.0312185.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ee/11556716/4ce9661fb7a0/pone.0312185.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ee/11556716/77721ee685ac/pone.0312185.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4ee/11556716/15bdb732fcb6/pone.0312185.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
External validation of a modified cardiovascular sequential organ failure assessment score in patients with suspected infection using the MIMIC-IV database.使用 MIMIC-IV 数据库对疑似感染患者的改良心血管序贯器官衰竭评估评分进行外部验证。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 12;19(11):e0312185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312185. eCollection 2024.
2
Modified Cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score in Sepsis: External Validation in Intensive Care Unit Patients.改良的脓毒症心血管序贯器官衰竭评估评分:在重症监护病房患者中的外部验证。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Dec 25;38(50):e418. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e418.
3
Modified cardiovascular SOFA score in sepsis: development and internal and external validation.改良脓毒症心血管 SOFA 评分:开发及内部和外部验证。
BMC Med. 2022 Aug 22;20(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02461-7.
4
Prognostic accuracy of the serum lactate level, the SOFA score and the qSOFA score for mortality among adults with Sepsis.血清乳酸水平、SOFA 评分和 qSOFA 评分对成人脓毒症死亡率的预后准确性。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Apr 30;27(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0609-3.
5
A time-incorporated SOFA score-based machine learning model for predicting mortality in critically ill patients: A multicenter, real-world study.一种基于时间整合的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的机器学习模型用于预测危重症患者的死亡率:一项多中心、真实世界研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Jul;163:104776. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104776. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
6
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
7
Comparison of the predictive value of scoring systems on the prognosis of cirrhotic patients with suspected infection.评分系统对疑似感染肝硬化患者预后预测价值的比较
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(28):e11421. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011421.
8
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
9
Comparison of different intensive care scoring systems and Glasgow Aneurysm score for aortic aneurysm in predicting 28-day mortality: a retrospective cohort study from MIMIC-IV database.比较不同的重症监护评分系统和格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分对预测主动脉瘤 28 天死亡率的作用:来自 MIMIC-IV 数据库的回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04184-4.
10
Prognostic ability of the sequential organ failure assessment score in accidental hypothermia: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study.序贯器官衰竭评估评分对意外低体温的预后能力:一项多机构回顾性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Nov 12;27(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0681-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Modified Cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score in Sepsis: External Validation in Intensive Care Unit Patients.改良的脓毒症心血管序贯器官衰竭评估评分:在重症监护病房患者中的外部验证。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Dec 25;38(50):e418. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e418.
2
Prognostic Performance of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III, and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II Scores in Patients with Suspected Infection According to Intensive Care Unit Type.根据重症监护病房类型,序贯器官衰竭评估、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分III及简化急性生理评分II在疑似感染患者中的预后评估表现
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 8;12(19):6402. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196402.
3
Benefits, key protocol components, and considerations for successful implementation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a review of the recent literature.
体外心肺复苏成功实施的益处、关键方案组成部分及注意事项:近期文献综述
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2023 Sep;10(3):265-279. doi: 10.15441/ceem.23.063. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
4
Hemodynamic management of septic shock: beyond the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines.脓毒性休克的血流动力学管理:超越《拯救脓毒症运动》指南
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2023 Sep;10(3):255-264. doi: 10.15441/ceem.23.065. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
5
Real-world inter-observer variability of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in intensive care medicine: the time has come for an update.重症医学中序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的真实世界观察者间变异性:更新的时候到了。
Crit Care. 2023 Apr 21;27(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04449-y.
6
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score: has the time come for an update?序贯器官衰竭评估 (SOFA) 评分:是否到了更新的时候?
Crit Care. 2023 Jan 13;27(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04290-9.
7
Modified cardiovascular SOFA score in sepsis: development and internal and external validation.改良脓毒症心血管 SOFA 评分:开发及内部和外部验证。
BMC Med. 2022 Aug 22;20(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02461-7.
8
Association of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) components with mortality.序贯性器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分与死亡率的相关性。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Jul;66(6):731-741. doi: 10.1111/aas.14067. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
9
Predictive ability of the sequential organ failure assessment score for in-hospital mortality in patients with cardiac critical illnesses: a nationwide observational study.序贯器官衰竭评估评分对心脏危重症患者住院死亡率的预测能力:一项全国性观察研究。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022 Jun 7;11(4):312-321. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuac011.
10
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):e1063-e1143. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337.