• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Caudate Nucleus Mediates Learning of Stimulus-Control State Associations.尾状核介导刺激控制状态关联的学习。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 25;37(4):1028-1038. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0778-16.2016.
2
Different neural correlates of reward expectation and reward expectation error in the putamen and caudate nucleus during stimulus-action-reward association learning.在刺激-动作-奖励关联学习过程中,壳核和尾状核中奖励期望与奖励期望误差的不同神经关联。
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;95(2):948-59. doi: 10.1152/jn.00382.2005. Epub 2005 Sep 28.
3
Control by association: Transfer of implicitly primed attentional states across linked stimuli.通过联想进行控制:跨链接刺激物转移隐含启动的注意状态。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Apr;25(2):617-626. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1445-6.
4
The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle revisited: evidence for asymmetries in action-effect learning.重新审视意念运动原理的神经基础:动作-效应学习中的不对称性证据。
Neuroscience. 2013 Feb 12;231:13-27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.11.035. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
5
A new look on S-R associations: How S and R link.对刺激-反应关联的新视角:刺激与反应如何联系。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Sep;160:161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.07.016. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
6
Frontal networks for learning and executing arbitrary stimulus-response associations.用于学习和执行任意刺激-反应关联的额叶网络。
J Neurosci. 2005 Mar 9;25(10):2723-32. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3697-04.2005.
7
Dynamic Trial-by-Trial Recoding of Task-Set Representations in the Frontoparietal Cortex Mediates Behavioral Flexibility.额顶叶皮层中任务集表征的逐次动态编码介导行为灵活性。
J Neurosci. 2017 Nov 8;37(45):11037-11050. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0935-17.2017. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
8
Memory Meets Control in Hippocampal and Striatal Binding of Stimuli, Responses, and Attentional Control States.在海马体和纹状体中,刺激、反应及注意力控制状态的结合实现记忆与控制
J Neurosci. 2015 Nov 4;35(44):14885-95. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2957-15.2015.
9
Priming of control: implicit contextual cuing of top-down attentional set.启动控制:自上而下注意定势的内隐语境提示。
J Neurosci. 2012 Jun 13;32(24):8192-200. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0934-12.2012.
10
Dissociating bottom-up and top-down processes in a manual stimulus-response compatibility task.在手动刺激-反应相容性任务中分离自下而上和自上而下的过程。
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Sep;104(3):1472-83. doi: 10.1152/jn.00261.2010. Epub 2010 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptive behavior is guided by integrated representations of controlled and non-controlled information.适应性行为由可控信息和不可控信息的整合表征所引导。
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 11:2025.08.07.669231. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.07.669231.
2
Serial processing of stimulus identity and shift readiness predictions.刺激特征的序列处理与转移准备预测
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Aug 5. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03137-z.
3
Modeling of control over task switching and cross-task interference supports a two-dimensional model of cognitive stability and flexibility.任务切换与跨任务干扰控制的建模支持了认知稳定性与灵活性的二维模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02712-7.
4
Does an external distractor interfere with the triggering of item-specific control?外部干扰器是否会干扰特定项目控制的触发?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2025 Jun;51(6):808-825. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001323. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
5
Alterations in brain function in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.中风后认知障碍患者的脑功能改变:一项静息态功能磁共振成像研究
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Feb 19;17:1501082. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1501082. eCollection 2025.
6
Principles of cognitive control over task focus and task switching.对任务焦点和任务切换进行认知控制的原则。
Nat Rev Psychol. 2023 Nov;2(11):702-714. doi: 10.1038/s44159-023-00234-4. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
7
Distinct basal ganglia contributions to learning from implicit and explicit value signals in perceptual decision-making.在知觉决策中,不同的基底神经节对隐性和显性价值信号的学习有不同的贡献。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jun 22;15(1):5317. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49538-w.
8
Task switch costs scale with dissimilarity between task rules.任务转换代价与任务规则之间的差异成正比。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jul;153(7):1873-1886. doi: 10.1037/xge0001598. Epub 2024 May 2.
9
Forming cognitive maps for abstract spaces: the roles of the human hippocampus and orbitofrontal cortex.形成抽象空间的认知地图:人类海马体和眶额皮质的作用。
Commun Biol. 2024 May 1;7(1):517. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06214-5.
10
A spatial version of the Stroop task for examining proactive and reactive control independently from non-conflict processes.一种空间版 Stroop 任务,用于独立于非冲突过程考察前摄和反应控制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 May;86(4):1259-1286. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02892-9. Epub 2024 Apr 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Implicitly strengthened task-irrelevant stimulus-response associations modulate cognitive control: Evidence from an fMRI study.内隐增强的任务无关刺激-反应关联调节认知控制:来自一项功能磁共振成像研究的证据。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Feb;37(2):756-72. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23064. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
2
Memory Meets Control in Hippocampal and Striatal Binding of Stimuli, Responses, and Attentional Control States.在海马体和纹状体中,刺激、反应及注意力控制状态的结合实现记忆与控制
J Neurosci. 2015 Nov 4;35(44):14885-95. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2957-15.2015.
3
An insula-frontostriatal network mediates flexible cognitive control by adaptively predicting changing control demands.脑岛-额纹状体网络通过适应性预测不断变化的控制需求来介导灵活的认知控制。
Nat Commun. 2015 Sep 22;6:8165. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9165.
4
Orthogonalization of regressors in FMRI models.功能磁共振成像模型中回归变量的正交化
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 28;10(4):e0126255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126255. eCollection 2015.
5
Differentiating neural systems mediating the acquisition vs. expression of goal-directed and habitual behavioral control.区分介导目标导向和习惯性行为控制的习得与表达的神经系统。
Eur J Neurosci. 2015 May;41(10):1358-71. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12897. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
6
Functionally dissociable influences on learning rate in a dynamic environment.在动态环境中对学习速率的功能可分离影响。
Neuron. 2014 Nov 19;84(4):870-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.013.
7
Creatures of habit (and control): a multi-level learning perspective on the modulation of congruency effects.习惯(与控制)的产物:关于一致性效应调节的多层次学习视角
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 6;5:1247. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01247. eCollection 2014.
8
Goals and task difficulty expectations modulate striatal responses to feedback.目标和任务难度预期会调节纹状体对反馈的反应。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Jun;14(2):610-20. doi: 10.3758/s13415-014-0269-8.
9
Corticostriatal output gating during selection from working memory.纹状体皮层输出门控在工作记忆选择期间。
Neuron. 2014 Feb 19;81(4):930-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.01.002.
10
Exploration of the mechanisms underlying the ISPC effect: evidence from behavioral and neuroimaging data.探究 ISPC 效应的作用机制:来自行为和神经影像学数据的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 May;51(6):1040-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.02.015. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

尾状核介导刺激控制状态关联的学习。

The Caudate Nucleus Mediates Learning of Stimulus-Control State Associations.

作者信息

Chiu Yu-Chin, Jiang Jiefeng, Egner Tobias

机构信息

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience and

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience and.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 25;37(4):1028-1038. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0778-16.2016.

DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0778-16.2016
PMID:28123033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5296776/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

A longstanding dichotomy in cognitive psychology and neuroscience pits controlled, top-down driven behavior against associative, bottom-up driven behavior, where cognitive control processes allow us to override well-learned stimulus-response (S-R) associations. By contrast, some previous studies have raised the intriguing possibility of an integration between associative and controlled processing in the form of stimulus-control state (S-C) associations, the learned linkage of specific stimuli to particular control states, such as high attentional selectivity. The neural machinery mediating S-C learning remains poorly understood, however. Here, we combined human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with a previously developed Stroop protocol that allowed us to dissociate reductions in Stroop interference based on S-R learning from those based on S-C learning. We modeled subjects' acquisition of S-C and S-R associations using an associative learning model and then used trial-by-trial S-C and S-R prediction error (PE) estimates in model-based behavioral and fMRI analyses. We found that PE estimates derived from S-C and S-R associations accounted for the reductions in behavioral Stroop interference effects in the S-C and S-R learning conditions, respectively. Moreover, model-based fMRI analyses identified the caudate nucleus as the key structure involved in selectively updating stimulus-control state associations. Complementary analyses also revealed a greater reliance on parietal cortex when using the learned S-R versus S-C associations to minimize Stroop interference. These results support the emerging view that generalizable control states can become associated with specific bottom-up cues, and they place the caudate nucleus of the dorsal striatum at the center of the neural stimulus-control learning machinery.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Previous behavioral studies have demonstrated that control states, for instance, heightened attentional selectivity, can become directly associated with, and subsequently retrieved by, particular stimuli, thus breaking down the traditional dichotomy between top-down and bottom-up driven behavior. However, the neural mechanisms underlying this type of stimulus-control learning remain poorly understood. We therefore combined noninvasive human neuroimaging with a task that allowed us to dissociate the acquisition of stimulus-control associations from that of stimulus-response associations. The results revealed the caudate nucleus as the key brain structure involved in selectively driving stimulus-control learning. These data represent the first identification of the neural mechanisms of stimulus-specific control associations, and they significantly extend current conceptions of the type of learning processes mediated by the caudate.

摘要

未标注

认知心理学和神经科学中一个长期存在的二分法将受控的、自上而下驱动的行为与联想的、自下而上驱动的行为对立起来,其中认知控制过程使我们能够克服习得性良好的刺激-反应(S-R)关联。相比之下,一些先前的研究提出了一种有趣的可能性,即联想与受控加工以刺激-控制状态(S-C)关联的形式进行整合,也就是特定刺激与特定控制状态(如高注意力选择性)之间的习得性联系。然而,介导S-C学习的神经机制仍知之甚少。在这里,我们将人类功能磁共振成像(fMRI)与先前开发的斯特鲁普实验方案相结合,该方案使我们能够区分基于S-R学习导致的斯特鲁普干扰减少和基于S-C学习导致的减少。我们使用联想学习模型对受试者S-C和S-R关联的习得进行建模,然后在基于模型的行为和fMRI分析中使用逐次试验的S-C和S-R预测误差(PE)估计。我们发现,分别来自S-C和S-R关联的PE估计解释了S-C和S-R学习条件下行为斯特鲁普干扰效应的减少。此外,基于模型的fMRI分析确定尾状核是参与选择性更新刺激-控制状态关联的关键结构。补充分析还显示,在使用习得的S-R关联与S-C关联来最小化斯特鲁普干扰时,对顶叶皮层的依赖更大。这些结果支持了一种新出现的观点,即通用的控制状态可以与特定的自下而上线索相关联,并且它们将背侧纹状体的尾状核置于神经刺激-控制学习机制的中心。

意义声明

先前的行为研究表明,控制状态,例如增强的注意力选择性,可以与特定刺激直接关联并随后由其唤起,从而打破了自上而下和自下而上驱动行为之间的传统二分法。然而,这种类型的刺激-控制学习背后的神经机制仍知之甚少。因此,我们将无创人类神经成像与一项任务相结合,该任务使我们能够区分刺激-控制关联的习得与刺激-反应关联的习得。结果表明尾状核是参与选择性驱动刺激-控制学习的关键脑结构。这些数据首次确定了刺激特异性控制关联的神经机制,并且它们显著扩展了当前对由尾状核介导的学习过程类型的认识。