DAS Piyali, Biswas Subhradev, Singh Ramji, Mukherjee Sanhita, Ghoshal Sharmistha, Pramanik Debasis
Physiology, Bankura Sammilani Medical College, Bankura, India.
Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India.
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2017 Jan;5(1):6-10.
Early Clinical Exposure has been conceptualized to orient medical students towards actual clinical scenario and help them correlate their theoretical knowledge with real life situations in early years of MBBS courses. In the present study we explored the outcome of early clinical exposure in the context of basic science topics (Physiology) in fresh MBBS entrants and compared their performance with a conventionally taught control group.
One hundred fifty voluntary students of 1st year MBBS (2015-16) batch consisted the sample of this study. They were divided into two groups through the simple random method (using computer generated random number table with roll numbers of the students). They were evaluated by MCQ (Multiple Choice Question) and OSCE (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) before and after being taught a basic Physiology topic (respiratory system) theoretically. The study group underwent clinical exposure before the post-test while the control group did not. Performance of the students was compared between the two groups by unpaired student's t-test whereas marks of pre and post-test within the same group were compared by paired Student's t-test. Everywhere p<0.05 was considered to be significant.
The marks of each group in the pre and post-tests differed significantly (P<0.05 in each case). Post-test marks were significantly greater in each group though the level of improvement was strikingly higher in the study group (p=0.01). Though there was no significant difference in pre-test marks of both groups (P=0.73), post-test marks were significantly higher in the study group (P=0.04). Among the exposed students, majority (92%) opined that ECE was a better technique being practically oriented and more interesting while some (8%) found it to be more time and energy-consuming, suitable for selective portions of basic science topics.
Early clinical exposure may be an effective technique to supplement the traditional theoretical teaching and improve the performance of fresh medical entrants in Physiology. It has better acceptability by the students and may be considered for inclusion in the existing pre-clinical curriculum with proper allocation of time and manpower.
早期临床接触已被概念化为引导医学生了解实际临床场景,并帮助他们在医学学士课程的早期阶段将理论知识与现实生活情况联系起来。在本研究中,我们探讨了新入学的医学学士新生在基础科学主题(生理学)背景下早期临床接触的结果,并将他们的表现与传统教学的对照组进行了比较。
本研究样本包括150名2015 - 16级医学学士一年级的自愿学生。通过简单随机方法(使用计算机生成的随机数表和学生学号)将他们分为两组。在理论上讲授基础生理学主题(呼吸系统)之前和之后,通过多项选择题(MCQ)和客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)对他们进行评估。研究组在测试后之前接受临床接触,而对照组没有。两组学生的表现通过非配对学生t检验进行比较,而同一组内测试前和测试后的分数通过配对学生t检验进行比较。各处p<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
每组测试前和测试后的分数有显著差异(每种情况下P<0.05)。每组测试后的分数显著更高,尽管研究组的提高水平明显更高(p = 0.01)。虽然两组测试前的分数没有显著差异(P = 0.73),但研究组测试后的分数显著更高(P = 0.04)。在接触临床的学生中,大多数(92%)认为早期临床接触是一种更好的方法,以实践为导向且更有趣,而一些人(8%)发现它更耗时耗力,适用于基础科学主题的某些部分。
早期临床接触可能是一种有效的技术,可以补充传统的理论教学,并提高新入学医学生在生理学方面的表现。它在学生中具有更好的可接受性,可以考虑在现有临床前课程中适当分配时间和人力的情况下纳入。