Sangam Muralidhar Reddy, K Praveen, G Vinay, Bokan Raju R, Deka Roonmoni, Kaur Amandeep
Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Guwahati, IND.
Cureus. 2021 Dec 16;13(12):e20472. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20472. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Introduction In the present Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME), learning is more student-centered where the students take the responsibility for their learning. Anatomy is an important basic science that lays the foundation for clinical courses in the Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) curriculum. To make it interesting and clinically useful, several innovative teaching-learning methods like case-based learning (CBL) and problem-based learning (PBL) are introduced. The present study was taken up to know the effectiveness of CBL as a teaching-learning method in Anatomy in improving the knowledge and retention of acquired knowledge. Material and Methods This was an interventional cross-over study carried out at NRI Medical College and General Hospital, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh. Two hundred students studying in first-year MBBS were included in the study and divided into two batches. The batches - A and B - were exposed to CBL and didactic lecture, respectively, in the first month for Topic I, and then cross-over was done in the second month for Topic II. The knowledge of the students before and after the sessions was assessed by pre-session and post-session multiple-choice question (MCQ) tests. Knowledge retention was assessed by another MCQ test conducted four weeks after the post-session test. Results The average difference of the scores between pre-session and post-session tests in the CBL group for Topics I and II (4.01±1.17 and 3.8±1.6) are significantly more compared to the didactic lecture method (3.3±1.3 and 1.9±1.2). The average difference of the scores between the post-session tests and retention-tests in the CBL group (0.122±1.05 and 0.18±1.04) were further compared to the lecture method (0.016±0.95 and 0.09±0.8) for Topics I and II, respectively. There was a significant increase in the proportion of students with scores above 50% in the post-session test and retention test in the CBL group compared to the didactic lecture group. Conclusion Results from the pre-session tests, post-session tests, and retention tests for both the topics indicate that CBL as a teaching-learning method in Anatomy is a more effective method for improving and retention of knowledge.
引言 在当前基于能力的医学教育(CBME)中,学习更以学生为中心,学生对自己的学习负责。解剖学是一门重要的基础科学,为医学学士和外科学士(MBBS)课程中的临床课程奠定基础。为了使其有趣且具有临床实用性,引入了几种创新的教学方法,如基于案例的学习(CBL)和基于问题的学习(PBL)。本研究旨在了解CBL作为解剖学教学方法在提高知识及所学知识的保留率方面的有效性。
材料与方法 这是一项在安得拉邦贡图尔市NRI医学院和综合医院进行的干预性交叉研究。200名MBBS一年级学生被纳入研究并分为两组。A组和B组在第一个月分别针对主题I接受CBL和讲授式讲座,然后在第二个月针对主题II进行交叉。通过课前和课后多项选择题(MCQ)测试评估学生在课程前后的知识。通过课后测试四周后进行的另一项MCQ测试评估知识保留情况。
结果 与讲授式讲座方法(3.3±1.3和1.9±1.2)相比,CBL组在主题I和II的课前和课后测试分数的平均差异(4.01±1.17和3.8±1.6)明显更大。CBL组在主题I和II的课后测试与保留测试分数的平均差异(0.122±1.05和0.18±1.04)分别与讲座方法(0.016±0.95和0.09±0.8)进一步比较。与讲授式讲座组相比,CBL组在课后测试和保留测试中得分高于50%的学生比例有显著增加。
结论 两个主题的课前测试、课后测试和保留测试结果表明,CBL作为解剖学的教学方法是提高和保留知识的更有效方法。