Aamodt A, Lund-Larsen J, Eine J, Andersen E, Benum P, Schnell Husby O
Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim.
Hip Int. 2002 Jul-Sep;12(3):263-273. doi: 10.1177/112070000201200301.
In this study we have compared the mechanical stability of custom (n=8) and anatomical (n=8) uncemented femoral components, following insertion into human cadaveric femurs, during simulated single leg stance and stair climbing. In the custom group two specimens were excluded from the study due to detachment of the greater trochanter during cyclical loading. As a consequence of their mechanical behaviour both types of stems could be divided into subgroups of "unstable" and "stable" implants. In the course of one thousand loading cycles three anatomical stems and one custom stem migrated more than 1 mm, which was interpreted as mechanical loosening. This difference in rate of mechanical loosening was not significant. However, the majority of the stems were remarkably stable and showed micromotion of less than 18 m and migration of less than 35 m at the proximal implant-bone interface. The corresponding figures for the tip of the stems were 243 m and 170 m, respectively. During torsional loading the custom stems showed less rotatory motion than the anatomical stem (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in the magnitude of cyclical micromotion or migration for the two types of femoral stems. (Hip International 2002; 12: 263-73).
在本研究中,我们比较了定制型(n = 8)和解剖型(n = 8)非骨水泥型股骨假体在植入人体尸体股骨后,在模拟单腿站立和爬楼梯过程中的机械稳定性。在定制组中,由于在循环加载过程中大转子分离,有两个标本被排除在研究之外。基于它们的力学行为,两种类型的柄都可分为“不稳定”和“稳定”植入物亚组。在一千次加载循环过程中,三个解剖型柄和一个定制型柄移位超过1毫米,这被解释为机械松动。机械松动率的这种差异并不显著。然而,大多数柄非常稳定,在近端假体 - 骨界面处显示出小于18微米的微动和小于35微米的移位。柄尖的相应数字分别为243微米和170微米。在扭转载荷期间,定制型柄比解剖型柄显示出更少的旋转运动(p<0.05)。两种类型的股骨干假体在循环微动或移位的幅度上没有显著差异。(《国际髋关节》2002年;12:263 - 73)