• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同金属托槽的剪切粘结强度和粘结剂残留指数的体外分析

In vitro analysis of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of different metal brackets.

作者信息

Henkin Fernanda de Souza, Macêdo Érika de Oliveira Dias de, Santos Karoline da Silva, Schwarzbach Marília, Samuel Susana Maria Werner, Mundstock Karina Santos

机构信息

Orthodontics' graduate student, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil.

Professor of Certificate in Orthodontic Program, Orthodontics Department, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil.

出版信息

Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Nov-Dec;21(6):67-73. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.6.067-073.oar.

DOI:10.1590/2177-6709.21.6.067-073.oar
PMID:28125142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5278935/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

: There is a great variety of orthodontic brackets in the Brazilian market, and constantly evaluating them is critical for professionals to know their properties, so as to be able to choose which product best suits their clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

: To evaluate the bond strength and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) of different brands of metal brackets.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

: A total of 105 bovine incisors were used, and brackets of different brands were bonded to teeth. Seven different bracket brands were tested (MorelliTM, American OrthodonticsTM, TP OrthodonticsTM, Abzil-3MTM, OrthometricTM, TecnidentTM and UNIDENTM). Twenty-four hours after bonding, shear bond strength test was performed; and after debonding, the ARI was determined by using an optical microscope at a 10-fold increase.

RESULTS

: Mean shear bond strength values ranged from 3.845 ± 3.997 (MorelliTM) to 9.871 ± 5.106 MPa (TecnidentTM). The majority of the ARI index scores was 0 and 1.

CONCLUSION

: Among the evaluated brackets, the one with the lowest mean shear bond strength values was MorelliTM. General evaluation of groups indicated that a greater number of bond failure occurred at the enamel/adhesive interface.

摘要

引言

巴西市场上有各种各样的正畸托槽,对它们进行持续评估对于专业人员了解其特性至关重要,以便能够选择最适合其临床实践的产品。

目的

评估不同品牌金属托槽的粘结强度和粘结剂残留指数(ARI)。

材料与方法

总共使用了105颗牛切牙,并将不同品牌的托槽粘结到牙齿上。测试了七个不同的托槽品牌(MorelliTM、American OrthodonticsTM、TP OrthodonticsTM、Abzil-3MTM、OrthometricTM、TecnidentTM和UNIDENTM)。粘结24小时后,进行剪切粘结强度测试;脱粘后,使用光学显微镜放大10倍确定ARI。

结果

平均剪切粘结强度值范围为3.845±3.997(MorelliTM)至9.871±5.106MPa(TecnidentTM)。大多数ARI指数评分是0和1。

结论

在评估的托槽中,平均剪切粘结强度值最低的是MorelliTM。对各组的总体评估表明,在釉质/粘结剂界面发生的粘结失败数量更多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e09/5278935/dc7dfa6d499f/2176-9451-dpjo-21-06-00067-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e09/5278935/461d10dfa7b7/2176-9451-dpjo-21-06-00067-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e09/5278935/dc7dfa6d499f/2176-9451-dpjo-21-06-00067-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e09/5278935/461d10dfa7b7/2176-9451-dpjo-21-06-00067-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e09/5278935/dc7dfa6d499f/2176-9451-dpjo-21-06-00067-gf2.jpg

相似文献

1
In vitro analysis of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of different metal brackets.不同金属托槽的剪切粘结强度和粘结剂残留指数的体外分析
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Nov-Dec;21(6):67-73. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.6.067-073.oar.
2
Evaluation of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of metal APC™ Flash-Free adhesive system: A comparative in vitro study with APC™ II and uncoated metal brackets.金属 APC™ Flash-Free 黏结系统的剪切粘结强度和黏结残留指数评价:与 APC™ II 和无涂层金属托槽的体外对比研究。
Int Orthod. 2022 Dec;20(4):100705. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100705. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
3
Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets.预涂正畸托槽与传统粘结正畸托槽的剪切粘结强度及粘结剂残留指数比较
Prog Orthod. 2013 Oct 20;14:39. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-39.
4
Effects of enamel sealing on shear bond strength and the adhesive remnant index : Study of three fluoride-releasing adhesives in combination with metal and ceramic brackets.釉质封闭对剪切粘结强度和粘结剂残留指数的影响:三种含氟粘结剂与金属及陶瓷托槽联合应用的研究
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Jan;78(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0065-x. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
5
In vitro Analysis of Shear Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index of Stainless Steel Brackets with Different Adhesive Systems to Enamel.不同粘接系统的不锈钢托槽与牙釉质间剪切粘接强度及粘接剂残留指数的体外分析
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Sep 1;19(9):1047-1051.
6
Effect of self-etchant pH on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.自酸蚀剂pH值对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Aug;134(2):203-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.039.
7
Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.新型可折叠陶瓷托槽脱粘特性的评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Nov;112(5):552-9. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70083-0.
8
Shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic brackets using color change adhesives.使用变色粘合剂的金属和陶瓷托槽的剪切粘结强度。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Mar-Apr;18(2):76-80. doi: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000200017.
9
Effect of adhesion boosters on indirect bracket bonding.黏结剂处理剂对间接粘接托槽的影响。
Angle Orthod. 2014 Jan;84(1):171-6. doi: 10.2319/012313-73.1. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
10
Shear bond strength of two 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesives when bonding ceramic brackets to bovine enamel.将陶瓷托槽粘结到牛牙釉质上时两种两步酸蚀冲洗粘结剂的剪切粘结强度。
Int Orthod. 2017 Sep;15(3):388-404. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of bonding failure rate with two light cure orthodontic adhesives: a cross-arch split-mouth prospective study.两种光固化正畸粘合剂粘结失败率的比较评估:一项跨牙弓分口前瞻性研究。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2025 May 23;30(2):e2524214. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.30.2.e2524214.oar. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of exposure of teeth to Ph change of chlorinated water on shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets (an in vitro study).牙齿暴露于氯化水的pH值变化对金属正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响(一项体外研究)
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 15;25(1):733. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06100-4.
3
Maxillary Incisor Fragment Reattachment Protocols: Influence on Tooth Fracture Resistance and Strength of Bonding to Orthodontic Brackets.

本文引用的文献

1
In-vitro bond strengths and clinical failure rates of metal brackets bonded with different light-emitting diode units and curing times.使用不同发光二极管装置和固化时间粘结的金属托槽的体外粘结强度和临床失败率
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Feb;149(2):212-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.036.
2
Enamel Quality after Debonding: Evaluation by Optical Coherence Tomography.脱粘后的牙釉质质量:通过光学相干断层扫描进行评估
Braz Dent J. 2015 Jul-Aug;26(4):384-9. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201300406.
3
Finite element study on modification of bracket base and its effects on bond strength.
上颌切牙碎片再接技术规程:对牙齿抗折性及与正畸托槽粘接强度的影响
J Clin Med. 2025 May 6;14(9):3220. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093220.
4
The Effect of MRI Exposure on the Shear Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index of Different Bracket Types.磁共振成像暴露对不同类型托槽剪切粘结强度和粘结剂残留指数的影响。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Feb 28;13(3):108. doi: 10.3390/dj13030108.
5
Assessment of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy With Curcumin on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Bracket: An In Vitro Study.姜黄素抗菌光动力疗法对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的评估:一项体外研究。
Int J Dent. 2025 Feb 25;2025:6790545. doi: 10.1155/ijod/6790545. eCollection 2025.
6
The Influence of Resin Infiltration on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.树脂渗透对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Jan 17;16(1):32. doi: 10.3390/jfb16010032.
7
Comparison of the Adhesive Remnant Index and Shear Bond Strength of Different Metal Bracket Bases on Artificially Aged Human Teeth: An Study.不同金属托槽基底在人工老化人牙上的黏结剂残留指数和剪切黏结强度比较:一项研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024 Oct 29;14(5):396-404. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_62_24. eCollection 2024 Sep-Oct.
8
Effect of Different Primers on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded to Reinforced Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Substrate.不同引物对粘结于增强聚醚醚酮(PEEK)基底上的正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jun 20;12(6):188. doi: 10.3390/dj12060188.
9
Does the use of universal adhesive systems improve the durability of the bond strength of orthodontic brackets to enamel?使用通用粘结系统是否能提高正畸托槽与牙釉质粘结强度的耐久性?
J Clin Exp Dent. 2024 Feb 1;16(2):e178-e185. doi: 10.4317/jced.61247. eCollection 2024 Feb.
10
Effect of Different Desensitizer Treatments on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Metal Brackets Following In-Office Bleaching: An In Vitro Study.不同脱敏剂处理对诊室漂白后正畸金属托槽剪切粘结强度的影响:一项体外研究
Eur J Dent. 2024 Jul;18(3):820-826. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1776119. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
托槽底座改良及其对粘结强度影响的有限元研究
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Mar-Apr;20(2):76-82. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.2.076-082.oar.
4
In-vivo evaluation of the surface roughness and morphology of enamel after bracket removal and polishing by different techniques.不同技术去除托槽并抛光后牙釉质表面粗糙度和形态的体内评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Mar;147(3):324-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.033.
5
Effect of adhesive resin flexibility on enamel fracture during metal bracket debonding: an ex vivo study.金属托槽脱粘过程中粘结树脂柔韧性对釉质骨折的影响:一项体外研究。
Eur J Orthod. 2015 Oct;37(5):550-5. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju086. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
6
Do we need a randomized controlled trial to assess trivial, albeit standard used, clinical steps in bonding? The answer is yes, but there are some interpretation issues.我们是否需要进行一项随机对照试验来评估粘结过程中那些虽属标准操作但却微不足道的临床步骤呢?答案是肯定的,但存在一些解释方面的问题。
Eur J Orthod. 2015 Apr;37(2):156-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju026. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
7
Do we need primer for orthodontic bonding? A randomized controlled trial.正畸粘接需要底漆吗?一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Orthod. 2015 Apr;37(2):147-55. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju024. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
8
The impact of surface preparation on shear bond strength of metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.表面处理对用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘结的金属正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
J Orthod. 2014 Sep;41(3):201-7. doi: 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000097.
9
In-vitro vs in-vivo materials research.体外与体内材料研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Apr;143(4 Suppl):S11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.002.
10
Orthodontic bracket debonding: risk of enamel fracture.正畸托槽脱落:釉质骨折的风险
Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Jan;18(1):327-34. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-0969-4. Epub 2013 Mar 16.