Jensen Karin H, Jørgensen Lisbeth, Haugegaard Svend, Herskin Mette S, Jensen Margit B, Pedersen Lene J, Canibe Nuria
Aarhus University, Department of Animal Science, AU-FOULUM, Blichers Allé 20, P.O. Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark.
SEGES Danish Pig Research Centre, Danish Agriculture and Food Council, Axeltorv 3, DK-1609 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Res Vet Sci. 2017 Jun;112:66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
The aim of the present study was (1) to determine the dose-response relationship between the amount of straw provided on the floor and oesophageal ulceration in pigs kept under typical Danish production conditions (18 pigs/pen, 0.7m/pig, partly slatted floor, ad libitum access to feed), (2) to reveal whether straw ingestion explains the effect of straw provision on the stomach health and (3) to elucidate the effect of straw ingestion on the stomach conditions. Data were collected at slaughter (approximately 100kg body weight) on pigs provided with straw amounts in the range 10g to 500g wheat straw/pig/day from 30kg body weight and fed a wheat-based pelleted feed added 15% non-heated and non-pelleted rolled barley. Aims (1) and (2) included 712 pigs kept in 42 pens, whereas (3) was studied on a subset of 37 pigs with either none or obvious amounts of straw in the stomach. The amount of straw provided affected stomach health in a curvilinear manner. Provision of up to approximately 300gstraw/pig/day progressively decreased the risk of oesophageal ulceration and scarring. At larger amounts of straw the ulceroprotective effect of straw was reduced which requires further investigation. Straw ingestion appeared to be an essential intermediary factor for the improvement of stomach health. The number of pigs without straw in the stomach decreased linearly with the logarithm of the amount of straw provided, which explained the effect of straw provision on stomach health. The structure of the stomach contents increased as revealed by the increased weight and dry matter content and decreased sedimentation of the digesta. Provision of approximately 300gstraw/pig/day on the floor may be a potential strategy to reduce, but not inevitably eliminate, oesophageal ulceration in pigs in commercial pig production.
(1)确定在典型的丹麦生产条件下(每栏18头猪,每头猪0.7平方米,部分漏缝地板,自由采食),提供给猪只的垫料秸秆量与食管溃疡之间的剂量反应关系;(2)揭示采食秸秆是否能解释提供秸秆对胃部健康的影响;(3)阐明采食秸秆对胃部状况的影响。对体重约100千克(屠宰时)的猪只收集数据,这些猪从30千克体重开始,每天每头猪提供10克至500克小麦秸秆,并饲喂添加了15%未经加热和制粒的碾压大麦的小麦基颗粒饲料。目标(1)和(2)涉及饲养在42个猪栏中的712头猪,而目标(3)是对37头胃内无秸秆或有明显数量秸秆的猪只子集进行研究。提供的秸秆量以曲线方式影响胃部健康。每天每头猪提供约300克秸秆可逐渐降低食管溃疡和瘢痕形成的风险。当秸秆量更大时,秸秆的溃疡保护作用会降低,这需要进一步研究。采食秸秆似乎是改善胃部健康的一个重要中介因素。胃内无秸秆的猪只数量随提供的秸秆量的对数呈线性减少,这解释了提供秸秆对胃部健康的影响。胃内容物的结构有所改善,表现为食糜重量增加、干物质含量增加以及沉降减少。在商业养猪生产中,每天每头猪在地板上提供约300克秸秆可能是一种潜在策略,可减少但不一定能消除猪的食管溃疡。