Mora Adan, Krug Brian S, Grigonis Antony M, Dawson Amanda, Jing Yuqing, Hammerman Samuel I
Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas (Mora) and Select Medical Corporation, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania (Krug, Grigonis, Dawson, Jing, Hammerman).
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2017 Jan;30(1):26-29. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2017.11929516.
Laboratory tests can be considered inappropriate if overused or when repeated, unnecessary "routine" testing occurs. For chronically critically ill patients treated in long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs), inappropriate testing may result in unnecessary blood draws that could potentially harm patients or increase infections. A quality improvement initiative was designed to increase physician awareness of their patterns of lab utilization in the LTACH environment. Within a large network of LTACHs, 9 hospitals were identified as having higher patterns of lab utilization than other LTACHs. Meetings were held with administrative staff and physicians, who designed and implemented hospital-specific strategies to address lab utilization. Lab utilization was measured in units of lab tests ordered per inpatient day (lab UPPD) for 8 months prior to the initial meeting and 7 months after the meeting. A repeated measures mixed model determined that postintervention lab utilization improved, on average and adjusted by case mix index, by 0.37 lab UPPD (t = -3.61, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.58) compared to the preintervention period. Overall, the case mix index 8 months prior to the intervention was no different than it was 7 months after the initial meeting (t[8] = -0.96, = 0.37). Patient safety and outcome measures, including percentage of patients weaned from a ventilator, readmission rates, central catheter utilization rates, and the incidence of methicillin-resistant and other multidrug resistant organisms, showed no significant change. Hospital staff meetings focused on lab utilization and the development and deployment of tailored lab utilization strategies were associated with LTACHs achieving significantly lower lab utilization without negatively impacting quality outcomes.
如果实验室检查过度使用或出现重复、不必要的“常规”检查,那么这些检查可被视为不恰当。对于在长期急性病医院(LTACHs)接受治疗的慢性危重病患者,不恰当的检查可能导致不必要的采血,这可能会对患者造成潜在伤害或增加感染风险。一项质量改进计划旨在提高医生对其在LTACH环境中实验室检查使用模式的认识。在一个大型LTACH网络中,有9家医院被确定其实验室检查使用模式高于其他LTACHs。与行政人员和医生举行了会议,他们设计并实施了针对医院的策略来解决实验室检查使用问题。在首次会议前8个月和会议后7个月,以每位住院日所开实验室检查的单位数(实验室检查每住院日单位数,lab UPPD)来衡量实验室检查使用情况。一个重复测量混合模型确定,与干预前时期相比,干预后经病例组合指数调整后的实验室检查使用平均改善了0.37 lab UPPD(t = -3.61,95%可信区间为0.17至0.58)。总体而言,干预前8个月的病例组合指数与首次会议后7个月的病例组合指数没有差异(t[8] = -0.96,P = 0.37)。患者安全和结局指标,包括脱机患者百分比、再入院率、中心导管使用率以及耐甲氧西林和其他多重耐药菌的发生率,均无显著变化。专注于实验室检查使用以及定制实验室检查使用策略的制定和实施的医院工作人员会议,与LTACHs实现显著更低的实验室检查使用且不对质量结局产生负面影响相关。