• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Variation in mortality rates after admission to long-term acute care hospitals for ventilator weaning.长期急性护理医院进行呼吸机脱机后死亡率的变化。
J Crit Care. 2018 Aug;46:6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.03.022. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
2
Time spent in prior hospital stay and outcomes for ventilator patients in long-term acute care hospitals.长期急性护理医院中使用呼吸机患者的先前住院时间和结果。
BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Mar 24;21(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01454-1.
3
Research Letter: Characterization of Older Adults Hospitalized With Traumatic Brain Injury Admitted to Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals.研究快报:长期急性护理医院收治的创伤性脑损伤老年住院患者的特征。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2022;37(2):89-95. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000685.
4
A latent class analysis of prolonged mechanical ventilation patients at a long-term acute care hospital: Subtype differences in clinical outcomes.长期急性护理医院中接受长时间机械通气患者的潜在类别分析:临床结局的亚型差异。
Heart Lung. 2019 May-Jun;48(3):215-221. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
5
Inpatient and long-term outcomes of individuals admitted for weaning from mechanical ventilation at a specialized ventilation weaning unit.在专门的通气撤机单位接受机械通气撤机的患者的住院和长期结局。
Respirology. 2013 Jan;18(1):154-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2012.02266.x.
6
An administrative model for benchmarking hospitals on their 30-day sepsis mortality.一种用于对医院30天脓毒症死亡率进行基准比对的管理模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 11;19(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4037-x.
7
Long-term acute care hospitals.长期急性病医院。
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Aug 1;49(3):438-43. doi: 10.1086/600391.
8
Effect of acute kidney injury on weaning from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients.急性肾损伤对危重症患者机械通气撤机的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):184-91. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000249828.81705.65.
9
Effects of a multifaceted, multidisciplinary, hospital-wide quality improvement program on weaning from mechanical ventilation.一项多方面、多学科、全院范围的质量改进计划对机械通气撤机的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2002 Jun;30(6):1224-30. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200206000-00009.
10
Relationship of the Duration of Ventilator Support to Successful Weaning and Other Clinical Outcomes in 437 Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation Patients.437例长期机械通气患者中呼吸机支持时长与成功撤机及其他临床结局的关系
J Intensive Care Med. 2017 May;32(4):283-291. doi: 10.1177/0885066615626897. Epub 2016 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Ventilator Weaning in Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation-A Narrative Review.长期机械通气中的撤机——一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 26;13(7):1909. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071909.
2
Patient Outcomes After Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Closures.长期急性护理医院关闭后患者的结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2344377. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44377.
3
Association between Residential Segregation and Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Performance on Improvement in Function among Ventilated Patients.居住隔离与长期急性护理医院对通气患者功能改善的绩效之间的关联。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Jan;19(1):147-150. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202107-796RL.
4
The Role of the Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Following Critical Illness-Has the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Demonstrated Their Usefulness or Emphasized Their Downside?危重症后的长期急性护理医院的作用——2019年冠状病毒病大流行是否证明了它们的有用性或凸显了它们的不足?
Crit Care Med. 2022 Feb 1;50(2):341-343. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005206.
5
Time spent in prior hospital stay and outcomes for ventilator patients in long-term acute care hospitals.长期急性护理医院中使用呼吸机患者的先前住院时间和结果。
BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Mar 24;21(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01454-1.
6
Patient and Family Centered Actionable Processes of Care and Performance Measures for Persistent and Chronic Critical Illness: A Systematic Review.持续性和慢性危重症以患者及家庭为中心的可操作护理流程与绩效指标:一项系统综述
Crit Care Explor. 2019 Apr 17;1(4):e0005. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000005. eCollection 2019 Apr.
7
Rethinking Delivery of Care for Patients Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation.对需要长期机械通气患者的护理交付进行重新思考。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 1;201(7):760-761. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202002-0292ED.
8
Effective Care Practices in Patients Receiving Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation. An Ethnographic Study.接受长时间机械通气患者的有效护理实践。一项民族志研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr 1;201(7):823-831. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201910-2006OC.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of Intensive Care and Mechanical Ventilation Codes in Medicare Data.医疗保险数据中重症监护和机械通气代码的验证
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jul;45(7):e711-e714. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002316.
2
Accounting for Patient Preferences Regarding Life-Sustaining Treatment in Evaluations of Medical Effectiveness and Quality.在医学有效性和质量评估中考虑患者对维持生命治疗的偏好。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct 15;196(8):958-963. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201701-0165CP.
3
The Role of Long-term Acute Care Hospitals in Treating the Critically Ill and Medically Complex: An Analysis of Nonventilator Patients.长期急性病医院在治疗重症及病情复杂患者中的作用:对非呼吸机依赖患者的分析
Med Care. 2015 Jul;53(7):582-90. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000382.
4
The Volume-Outcome Relationship in Critical Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.重症监护中的容量-结局关系:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chest. 2015 Jul;148(1):79-92. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-2195.
5
The epidemiology of chronic critical illness in the United States*.美国慢性危重病的流行病学*
Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb;43(2):282-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000710.
6
Chronic critical illness.慢性危重病
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 9;370(2):175-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1310675.
7
Impact of critical care nursing on 30-day mortality of mechanically ventilated older adults.重症监护护理对机械通气老年患者 30 天死亡率的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2014 May;42(5):1089-95. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000127.
8
An official American Thoracic Society research statement: comparative effectiveness research in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine.美国胸科学会官方研究声明:肺部、危重病学和睡眠医学的比较效果研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Nov 15;188(10):1253-61. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201310-1790ST.
9
Do intensivist staffing patterns influence hospital mortality following ICU admission? A systematic review and meta-analyses.加强型内科医生配置模式是否会影响 ICU 入院后的医院死亡率?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Oct;41(10):2253-74. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318292313a.
10
Generating evidence on best practice in long-term acute care hospitals.生成关于长期急性病护理医院最佳实践的证据。
JAMA. 2013 Feb 20;309(7):719-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.848.

长期急性护理医院进行呼吸机脱机后死亡率的变化。

Variation in mortality rates after admission to long-term acute care hospitals for ventilator weaning.

机构信息

CRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Department of Health Policy & Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

CRISMA Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2018 Aug;46:6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.03.022. Epub 2018 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.03.022
PMID:29627660
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6014911/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We sought to examine variation in long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) quality based on 90-day in-hospital mortality for patients admitted for weaning from mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

We developed an administrative risk-adjustment model using data from Medicare claims. We validated the administrative model against a clinical model using data from LTACHs participating in a 2002 to 2003 clinical registry. We then used our validated administrative model to assess national variation in 90-day in-hospital mortality rates in LTACHs from 2013.

RESULTS

The administrative risk-adjustment model was derived using data from 9447 patients admitted to 221 LTACHs in 2003. The model had good discrimination (C statistic=0.72) and calibration. Compared to a clinically derived model using data from 1163 patients admitted to 14 LTACHs, the administrative model generated similar performance estimates. National variation in risk-adjusted mortality was assessed using data from 20,453 patients admitted to 380 LTACHs in 2013. LTACH-specific risk-adjusted mortality rates varied from 8.4% to 48.1% (median: 24.2%, interquartile range: 19.7%-30.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

LTACHs vary widely in mortality rates, underscoring the need to better understand the sources of this variation and improve the quality of care for patients requiring long-term ventilator weaning.

摘要

目的

我们试图通过对因机械通气撤机而住院患者的 90 天院内死亡率来检验长期急性护理医院(LTACH)的质量差异。

方法

我们使用医疗保险索赔数据开发了一个行政风险调整模型。我们使用来自参与 2002 年至 2003 年临床登记的 LTACH 的临床数据来验证行政模型。然后,我们使用验证后的行政模型评估了 2013 年 LTACH 患者 90 天院内死亡率的全国差异。

结果

行政风险调整模型是使用 2003 年 221 家 LTACH 中 9447 名住院患者的数据得出的。该模型具有良好的区分度(C 统计值=0.72)和校准度。与使用来自 14 家 LTACH 的 1163 名住院患者的临床数据得出的模型相比,行政模型产生了类似的性能估计。使用 2013 年 380 家 LTACH 中 20453 名住院患者的数据评估了全国风险调整死亡率的差异。LTACH 特定的风险调整死亡率从 8.4%到 48.1%不等(中位数:24.2%,四分位距:19.7%-30.7%)。

结论

LTACH 的死亡率差异很大,这突出表明需要更好地了解这种差异的来源,并提高需要长期呼吸机撤机的患者的护理质量。