Suppr超能文献

在模拟犯罪场景中扮演嫌疑人与证人角色的参与者之间,Pz处的P300波幅以及F3处的N200/N300潜伏期存在差异。

P300 amplitude at Pz and N200/N300 latency at F3 differ between participants simulating suspect versus witness roles in a mock crime.

作者信息

Rosenfeld J Peter, Ozsan Ilayda, Ward Anne C

机构信息

Psychology Department, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Psychophysiology. 2017 Apr;54(4):640-648. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12823. Epub 2017 Jan 27.

Abstract

Based on the autonomic nervous system (ANS) study by klein Selle, Verschuere, Kindt, Meijer, & Ben Shakhar (2016), 15 participants pretended to perform a crime shown on a video, which 16 other participants pretended to witness. Both groups then experienced a P300-based Concealed Information Test (CIT) protocol called the complex trial protocol. Both groups showed CIT effects, with a larger probe than irrelevant P300s at Pz. However, this effect was significantly larger in the suspect group. In contrast, only the suspect group showed delayed N200/N300 responses at F3-putative inhibitory signs. This supports the klein Selle et al. (2016) ANS study in that the suspect versus witness role-playing manipulation differentially affected inhibitory (vs. orienting) aspects of the CIT situation. Our results are also consistent with Ambach, Stark, Peper, & Vaitl (2008), who saw the same autonomic response fractionation as klein Selle et al., but using Furedy's differentiation of deception method (Furedy, Davis, & Gurevich, 1988). These similarities are discussed.

摘要

基于克莱因·塞勒、韦尔舒尔、金特、梅杰和本·沙哈尔(2016年)对自主神经系统(ANS)的研究,15名参与者假装实施视频中展示的犯罪行为,另有16名参与者假装目睹该犯罪行为。然后,两组参与者都经历了一种基于P300的隐蔽信息测试(CIT)方案,即复杂试验方案。两组均显示出CIT效应,在头顶中央(Pz)位置,探测刺激引发的P300大于无关刺激引发的P300。然而,这种效应在嫌疑人组中显著更大。相比之下,只有嫌疑人组在额中部(F3)——假定的抑制信号处显示出N200/N300反应延迟。这支持了克莱因·塞勒等人(2016年)的自主神经系统研究,即嫌疑人与证人的角色扮演操作对CIT情境的抑制(与定向相对)方面产生了不同影响。我们的结果也与安巴赫、斯塔克、佩珀和瓦特(2008年)的研究一致,他们观察到与克莱因·塞勒等人相同的自主反应分离,但采用了弗雷迪的欺骗方法区分(弗雷迪、戴维斯和古列维奇,1988年)。本文讨论了这些相似之处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验