• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院痴呆症患者的护理价值观的认知错位:患者-家庭照顾者对的初步研究。

Incongruent perceptions of the care values of hospitalized persons with dementia: a pilot study of patient-family caregiver dyads.

机构信息

a College of Nursing, The University of Utah , Salt Lake City , UT , USA.

b Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging/Center for Research and Education , Cleveland , OH , USA.

出版信息

Aging Ment Health. 2018 Apr;22(4):489-496. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1280766. Epub 2017 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1080/13607863.2017.1280766
PMID:28128641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5529266/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Many difficult decisions are made in the inpatient hospital setting regarding the daily care of persons with dementia (PWDs). Incongruent perceptions of the PWD's care values limit the family caregiver's ability to make surrogate decisions. The objectives of this pilot study were to describe and identify determinants of incongruent perceptions in the hospital setting.

METHODS

Using multilevel modeling (MLM), we examined cross-sectional data collected from 42 PWD-family caregiver dyads.

RESULTS

There was a significant amount of incongruence, on average, for all four subscales representing the PWD's care values: autonomy = -0.33 (p < .001); burden = -.49 (p < .001); safety/quality of care = -.26 (p < .001); and social interactions = -.21 (p = .004). Family caregivers (CG) rated the importance of care values to the PWD as lower than the PWD rated the importance. Determinants of greater incongruence included higher relationship strain and fewer positive dyadic interactions.

CONCLUSION

Our findings reveal significant levels of incongruence in perceptions of the PWD's values among dementia care dyads in the hospital setting. Our analysis suggests a potential impact of relationship variables on incongruence. Further research is needed around this overlooked interpersonal context for supporting the dementia care dyad in the hospital setting.

摘要

目的

在住院医院环境中,针对痴呆症患者(PWD)的日常护理做出了许多艰难的决策。对 PWD 的护理价值观的认知不一致限制了家庭照顾者做出代理决策的能力。本试点研究的目的是描述和确定医院环境中认知不一致的决定因素。

方法

使用多层线性模型(MLM),我们检查了从 42 对 PWD-家庭照顾者对收集的横断面数据。

结果

在代表 PWD 的护理价值观的所有四个分量表上,平均存在大量的不一致:自主性= -0.33(p<.001);负担= -.49(p<.001);安全性/护理质量= -.26(p<.001);社会互动= -.21(p=.004)。家庭照顾者(CG)对 PWD 护理价值观的重视程度低于 PWD 对其重视程度。更大不一致的决定因素包括更高的关系紧张和较少的积极对偶互动。

结论

我们的研究结果揭示了在医院环境中痴呆症护理对认知不一致的水平显著。我们的分析表明,关系变量对不一致性有潜在影响。需要进一步研究这一被忽视的人际背景,以支持痴呆症护理对在医院环境中的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d6a/5529266/ad70a6230989/nihms855171f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d6a/5529266/ad70a6230989/nihms855171f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d6a/5529266/ad70a6230989/nihms855171f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Incongruent perceptions of the care values of hospitalized persons with dementia: a pilot study of patient-family caregiver dyads.住院痴呆症患者的护理价值观的认知错位:患者-家庭照顾者对的初步研究。
Aging Ment Health. 2018 Apr;22(4):489-496. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1280766. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
2
Care Values in Dementia: Patterns of Perception and Incongruence Among Family Care Dyads.痴呆症中的关怀价值观:家庭护理对子中的感知模式和不和谐。
Gerontologist. 2019 May 17;59(3):509-518. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny008.
3
Involvement of Hospitalized Persons With Dementia in Everyday Decisions: A Dyadic Study.住院痴呆症患者参与日常决策:一项对偶研究。
Gerontologist. 2018 Jul 13;58(4):644-653. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw265.
4
Life-space mobility in dementia patients and family caregivers: A dyadic approach.痴呆患者及其家庭照顾者的生活空间流动性:一种对偶方法。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2020 Dec;15(4):e12341. doi: 10.1111/opn.12341. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
5
Effect of Collaborative Dementia Care via Telephone and Internet on Quality of Life, Caregiver Well-being, and Health Care Use: The Care Ecosystem Randomized Clinical Trial.电话和互联网协作式痴呆护理对生活质量、照顾者幸福感和医疗保健利用的影响:护理生态系统随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;179(12):1658-1667. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4101.
6
Caregiver burden, mental health, quality of life and self-efficacy of family caregivers of persons with dementia in Malaysia: baseline results of a psychoeducational intervention study.马来西亚痴呆症患者照顾者的负担、心理健康、生活质量和自我效能感:一项心理教育干预研究的基线结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05221-9.
7
Quality of Life for Dementia Caregiving Dyads: Effects of Incongruent Perceptions of Everyday Care and Values.痴呆照护者对日常照护和价值观的认知不一致对生活质量的影响:痴呆照护者对日常照护和价值观的认知不一致对生活质量的影响。
Gerontologist. 2017 Aug 1;57(4):657-666. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw055.
8
Well-being in dementia: a cross-sectional dyadic study of the impact of multiple dimensions of strain on persons living with dementia and their family care partners.痴呆症患者的幸福感:对多个压力维度对痴呆症患者及其家庭照护者的影响的横断面双体研究。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 May;31(5):617-626. doi: 10.1017/S104161021800203X. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
9
Predictors of unmet needs in Chilean older people with dementia: a cross-sectional study.智利痴呆老年人群中未满足需求的预测因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Apr 15;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1131-1.
10
Predictors of self- and caregiver-rated quality of life for people with dementia living in the community and in nursing homes in northern Taiwan.预测居住在台湾北部社区和养老院的痴呆症患者的自我和护理人员生活质量。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 May;27(5):825-36. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002506. Epub 2014 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Nursing staff's attitudes towards the prevention of adverse events among hospitalized people with dementia: Protocol of qualitative systematic review and evidence synthesis.护理人员对预防住院痴呆症患者不良事件的态度:定性系统评价和证据综合议定书。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 9;19(9):e0301651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301651. eCollection 2024.
2
Advance Care Planning in the Context of Dementia: Defining Concordance.痴呆症背景下的预先医疗指示规划:定义一致性。
Gerontologist. 2024 Jun 1;64(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae029.
3
Promoting Advance Care Planning for Persons with Dementia: Study Protocol for the LEAD (Life-Planning in Early Alzheimer's and Other Dementias) Clinical Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of Life for Dementia Caregiving Dyads: Effects of Incongruent Perceptions of Everyday Care and Values.痴呆照护者对日常照护和价值观的认知不一致对生活质量的影响:痴呆照护者对日常照护和价值观的认知不一致对生活质量的影响。
Gerontologist. 2017 Aug 1;57(4):657-666. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw055.
2
Person-centred dementia care: moving beyond caregiving.以患者为中心的痴呆症护理:超越照料范畴。
Aging Ment Health. 2016 Jul;20(7):667-8. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1154017. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
3
Planning and Decision Making for Care Transitions.护理转接的规划与决策
促进痴呆症患者的预先护理计划:LEAD(早期阿尔茨海默病及其他痴呆症患者的生命规划)临床试验研究方案。
OBM Integr Compliment Med. 2023;8(1). doi: 10.21926/obm.icm.2301004. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
4
The Remote Assessment and Dynamic Response Program: Development of an In-Home Dementia-Related Care Needs Assessment to Improve Well-Being.远程评估与动态响应计划:开发一项居家痴呆相关护理需求评估以改善福祉。
Innov Aging. 2022 Feb 7;6(2):igac006. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igac006. eCollection 2022.
5
Implementation of the Mental Capacity Act: a national observational study comparing resultant trends in place of death for older heart failure decedents with or without comorbid dementia.《精神能力法案》的实施:一项全国性观察性研究,比较了有或没有合并痴呆症的老年心力衰竭死者的死亡地点的趋势。
BMC Med. 2022 Jan 20;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02210-2.
6
The Effectiveness of a Dyadic Pain Management Program for Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Chronic Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.双重视角疼痛管理方案对社区居住的慢性疼痛老年患者的效果:一项先导随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 9;17(14):4966. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17144966.
7
Factors influencing quality of life in African-American dementia dyads.影响非裔美国痴呆症患者二人组生活质量的因素。
Aging Ment Health. 2021 Apr;25(4):703-710. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1711865. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
8
Care Values in Dementia: Patterns of Perception and Incongruence Among Family Care Dyads.痴呆症中的关怀价值观:家庭护理对子中的感知模式和不和谐。
Gerontologist. 2019 May 17;59(3):509-518. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny008.
Annu Rev Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;31(1):111-142. doi: 10.1891/0198-8794.31.111.
4
Do Family Proxies Get It Right? Concordance in Reports of Nursing Home Residents' Everyday Preferences.家庭代理人的判断正确吗?养老院居民日常偏好报告的一致性
J Appl Gerontol. 2017 Jun;36(6):667-691. doi: 10.1177/0733464815581485. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
5
Incongruent perceptions of pain and physical function among families living with lung cancer.肺癌患者家庭对疼痛和身体功能的认知不一致。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Sep;23(9):2755-62. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2640-x. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
6
The experience of family carers of people with dementia who are hospitalised.痴呆患者住院期间其家属照顾者的体验。
Dementia (London). 2016 Sep;15(5):1234-45. doi: 10.1177/1471301214558308. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
7
Going home? An ethnographic study of assessment of capacity and best interests in people with dementia being discharged from hospital.回家?一项关于评估痴呆症患者出院时的行为能力和最大利益的人种志研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2014 Apr 23;14:56. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-56.
8
Patterns and predictors of symptom incongruence in older couples coping with prostate cancer.老年夫妻应对前列腺癌时症状不一致的模式及预测因素
Support Care Cancer. 2014 May;22(5):1341-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2092-0. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
9
2013 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2013 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Mar;9(2):208-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.02.003.
10
Falling behind: a substantive theory of care for older people with cognitive impairment in acute settings.落后:急性环境中认知障碍老年人护理的实质性理论。
J Clin Nurs. 2013 Jun;22(11-12):1682-91. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12177. Epub 2013 Mar 4.