• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Once daily ceftriaxone vs. chloramphenicol for treatment of typhoid fever in children.

作者信息

Moosa A, Rubidge C J

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Natal, Durban, Republic of South Africa.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1989 Oct;8(10):696-9. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198910000-00007.

DOI:10.1097/00006454-198910000-00007
PMID:2812914
Abstract

In a prospective, randomized, open study ceftriaxone was compared with chloramphenicol for treatment of 59 children who had bacteriologically confirmed acute typhoid fever. Ceftriaxone was administered intramuscularly in a once a day dose of approximately 80 mg/kg body weight for 5 days. Chloramphenicol was given orally for 3 weeks in a daily dosage of 50 to 100 mg/kg body weight divided into 4 doses. In the ceftriaxone group 23 of 29 patients were cured, 2 improved, 1 failed and 2 relapsed. For those who received chloramphenicol 22 of the 30 patients were cured, 5 improved, 1 failed and 2 relapsed. In none of the patients in either group were adverse effects recorded. The overall results of this comparative study suggest that short term treatment of typhoid fever with ceftriaxone is as effective and safe as conventional treatment with chloramphenicol.

摘要

相似文献

1
Once daily ceftriaxone vs. chloramphenicol for treatment of typhoid fever in children.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1989 Oct;8(10):696-9. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198910000-00007.
2
Treatment of typhoid fever in children with a flexible-duration of ceftriaxone, compared with 14-day treatment with chloramphenicol.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003 Apr;21(4):350-3. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(02)00388-6.
3
Treatment of typhoid fever: randomized trial of a three-day course of ceftriaxone versus a fourteen-day course of chloramphenicol.伤寒热的治疗:头孢曲松三日疗程与氯霉素十四日疗程的随机试验。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995 Feb;52(2):162-5. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.52.162.
4
Three-day treatment of typhoid fever with two different doses of ceftriaxone, compared to 14-day therapy with chloramphenicol: a randomized trial.两种不同剂量头孢曲松对伤寒热进行三日治疗与氯霉素十四日治疗的比较:一项随机试验
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991 Nov;28(5):765-72. doi: 10.1093/jac/28.5.765.
5
Randomized treatment of patients with typhoid fever by using ceftriaxone or chloramphenicol.采用头孢曲松或氯霉素对伤寒患者进行随机治疗。
J Infect Dis. 1988 Oct;158(4):742-7. doi: 10.1093/infdis/158.4.742.
6
Ceftriaxone versus chloramphenicol in the treatment of enteric fever.头孢曲松与氯霉素治疗伤寒的对比研究
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1990;16(12):607-9.
7
Treatment of typhoid fever with ceftriaxone for 5 days or chloramphenicol for 14 days: a randomized clinical trial.用头孢曲松治疗伤寒热5天或用氯霉素治疗14天:一项随机临床试验。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Aug;37(8):1572-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.8.1572.
8
Successful treatment of typhoid fever in children with parenteral ceftriaxone.用头孢曲松钠治疗儿童伤寒热取得成功。
Scand J Infect Dis. 1987;19(4):467-8. doi: 10.3109/00365548709021680.
9
[Treatment of typhoid fever for three days with ceftriaxone].用头孢曲松治疗伤寒热三天
Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 1990;83(4):468-72.
10
Ceftriaxone therapy in ciprofloxacin treatment failure typhoid fever in children.头孢曲松治疗儿童环丙沙星治疗失败的伤寒热。
Indian J Med Res. 2001 Jun;113:210-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of enteric fever (typhoid and paratyphoid fever) with cephalosporins.头孢菌素治疗肠热病(伤寒和副伤寒)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 24;11(11):CD010452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010452.pub2.
2
Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Laboratory Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Antimicrobial Management of Invasive Salmonella Infections.侵袭性沙门氏菌感染的流行病学、临床表现、实验室诊断、抗菌药物耐药性及抗菌药物管理
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015 Oct;28(4):901-37. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00002-15.
3
Treatment of typhoid fever with ceftriaxone for 5 days or chloramphenicol for 14 days: a randomized clinical trial.
用头孢曲松治疗伤寒热5天或用氯霉素治疗14天:一项随机临床试验。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Aug;37(8):1572-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.8.1572.
4
Ciprofloxacin versus ceftriaxone in the treatment of multiresistant typhoid fever.环丙沙星与头孢曲松治疗多重耐药伤寒热的对比
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993 Dec;12(12):907-10. doi: 10.1007/BF01992163.