Hung Tsung-Hsing, Tseng Chih-Wei, Tsai Chen-Chi, Hsieh Yu-Hsi, Tseng Kuo-Chih, Tsai Chih-Chun
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, No. 2, Minsheng Rd., Dalin Township, Chiayi County, 62247, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Apr;62(4):1080-1085. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4463-8. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
Pleural effusion is an abnormal collection of body fluids that may cause related morbidity or mortality in cirrhotic patients. There are insufficient data to determine the optimal method of drainage, for symptomatic relief in cirrhotic patients with pleural effusion.
In this study, we compare the mortality outcomes of catheter drainage versus thoracentesis in cirrhotic patients.
The National Health Insurance Database, derived from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Program, was used to identify cirrhotic patients with pleural effusion requiring drainage between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2010. In all, 2556 cirrhotic patients with pleural effusion were selected for the study and divided into the two groups (n = 1278/group) after propensity score matching.
The mean age was 61.0 ± 14.3 years, and 68.9% (1761/2556) were men. The overall 30-day mortality was 21.0% (538/2556) and was higher in patients treated with catheter drainage than those treated with thoracentesis (23.5 vs. 18.6%, respectively, P < 0.001 by log-rank test). After Cox proportional hazard regression analysis adjusted by patient sex, age, and comorbid disorders, the risk of 30-day mortality was significantly higher in cirrhotic patients who accepted catheter drainage compared to thoracentesis (hazard ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.10-1.54, P = 0.003). Old age, hepatic encephalopathy, bleeding esophageal varices, hepatocellular carcinoma, ascites, and pneumonia were associated with higher risks for 30-day mortality.
In cirrhotic patients with pleural effusion requiring drainage, catheter drainage is associated with higher mortality compared to thoracentesis.
胸腔积液是一种体液异常积聚,可导致肝硬化患者出现相关发病或死亡情况。目前尚无足够数据来确定肝硬化胸腔积液患者症状缓解的最佳引流方法。
在本研究中,我们比较了肝硬化患者导管引流与胸腔穿刺术的死亡结局。
利用台湾全民健康保险计划的全民健康保险数据库,识别出2007年1月1日至2010年12月31日期间需要引流的肝硬化胸腔积液患者。总共选择了2556例肝硬化胸腔积液患者进行研究,并在倾向评分匹配后分为两组(每组n = 1278)。
平均年龄为61.0±14.3岁,男性占68.9%(1761/2556)。总体30天死亡率为21.0%(538/2556),导管引流治疗的患者死亡率高于胸腔穿刺术治疗的患者(分别为23.5%和18.6%,对数秩检验P<0.001)。在按患者性别、年龄和合并症进行调整的Cox比例风险回归分析后,与胸腔穿刺术相比,接受导管引流的肝硬化患者30天死亡风险显著更高(风险比1.30,95%置信区间1.10 - 1.54,P = 0.003)。老年、肝性脑病、食管静脉曲张出血、肝细胞癌、腹水和肺炎与30天死亡风险较高相关。
在需要引流的肝硬化胸腔积液患者中,与胸腔穿刺术相比,导管引流与更高的死亡率相关。