• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BACS:用于认知心理学和神经科学研究的布鲁塞尔人工字符集。

BACS: The Brussels Artificial Character Sets for studies in cognitive psychology and neuroscience.

机构信息

Laboratoire Cognition Langage, Développement (LCLD), Centre de Recherche Cognition et Neurosciences (CRCN), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Av. F. Roosevelt, 50, CP 191 1050, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2017 Dec;49(6):2093-2112. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0844-8.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-016-0844-8
PMID:28130730
Abstract

Written symbols such as letters have been used extensively in cognitive psychology, whether to understand their contributions to written word recognition or to examine the processes involved in other mental functions. Sometimes, however, researchers want to manipulate letters while removing their associated characteristics. A powerful solution to do so is to use new characters, devised to be highly similar to letters, but without the associated sound or name. Given the growing use of artificial characters in experimental paradigms, the aim of the present study was to make available the Brussels Artificial Character Sets (BACS): two full, strictly controlled, and portable sets of artificial characters for a broad range of experimental situations.

摘要

书面符号,如字母,在认知心理学中得到了广泛应用,无论是理解它们对书面文字识别的贡献,还是研究其他心理功能所涉及的过程。然而,有时研究人员希望在去除字母相关特征的同时操作字母。一种强有力的解决方案是使用新字符,这些字符设计得与字母高度相似,但没有相关的声音或名称。鉴于人工字符在实验范式中的使用越来越多,本研究的目的是提供布鲁塞尔人工字符集(BACS):两套完整、严格控制且可移植的人工字符集,适用于广泛的实验情境。

相似文献

1
BACS: The Brussels Artificial Character Sets for studies in cognitive psychology and neuroscience.BACS:用于认知心理学和神经科学研究的布鲁塞尔人工字符集。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Dec;49(6):2093-2112. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0844-8.
2
Computer-based measurement of letter and word acuity.基于计算机的字母和单词视敏度测量。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006 Mar;26(2):156-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00345.x.
3
Is self special? A critical review of evidence from experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience.自我很特别吗?对来自实验心理学和认知神经科学证据的批判性综述。
Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;131(1):76-97. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.76.
4
On the distinction between position and order information when processing strings of characters.在处理字符序列时区分位置信息和顺序信息。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Apr;86(3):883-896. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02872-z. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
5
The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: theoretical and methodological considerations.认知与临床神经科学中的失配负波:理论与方法学考量
Biol Psychol. 2007 Jan;74(1):1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Jul 17.
6
Graphic complexity in writing systems.文字系统的图形复杂性。
Cognition. 2021 Sep;214:104771. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104771. Epub 2021 May 23.
7
A Japanese logographic character frequency list for cognitive science research.
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2000 Aug;32(3):482-500. doi: 10.3758/bf03200819.
8
Cognitive neuroscience: distinguishing self from other.认知神经科学:区分自我与他人。
Curr Biol. 2011 Mar 8;21(5):R189-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.056.
9
A madness to the methods in cognitive neuroscience?认知神经科学中的方法存在疯狂之处?
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Jun;17(6):847-9. doi: 10.1162/0898929054021085.
10
Preface to the special issue: computational cognitive neuroscience.特刊前言:计算认知神经科学
Brain Res. 2008 Apr 2;1202:1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.030. Epub 2007 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Can prediction error explain predictability effects on the N1 during picture-word verification?预测误差能否解释图片-单词验证过程中对N1的可预测性效应?
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Apr 8;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00131. eCollection 2024.
2
Anatomically distinct regions in the inferior frontal cortex are modulated by task and reading skill.额下回中在解剖学上不同的区域会受到任务和阅读技能的调节。
J Neurosci. 2025 Mar 24;45(19). doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1767-24.2025.
3
Reevaluating the neural noise in dyslexia using biomarkers from electroencephalography and high-resolution magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
利用脑电图和高分辨率磁共振波谱学的生物标志物重新评估阅读障碍中的神经噪声。
Elife. 2025 Mar 3;13:RP99920. doi: 10.7554/eLife.99920.
4
Toward a Mechanistic Understanding of Reading Difficulties: Deviant Audiovisual Learning Dynamics and Network Connectivity in Children with Poor Reading Skills.迈向对阅读困难的机制性理解:阅读技能差的儿童中异常的视听学习动态与网络连通性
J Neurosci. 2025 Apr 23;45(17):e1119242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1119-24.2025.
5
Letters, Words, Sentences, and Reading.字母、单词、句子与阅读。
J Cogn. 2024 Aug 27;7(1):66. doi: 10.5334/joc.396. eCollection 2024.
6
Reading Reshapes Stimulus Selectivity in the Visual Word Form Area.阅读重塑视觉词形区的刺激选择性。
eNeuro. 2024 Jul 26;11(7). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0228-24.2024. Print 2024 Jul.
7
Reading reshapes stimulus selectivity in the visual word form area.阅读重塑视觉词形区的刺激选择性。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 18:2023.10.04.560764. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.04.560764.
8
Selective Neural Entrainment Reveals Hierarchical Tuning to Linguistic Regularities in Reading.选择性神经同步揭示了阅读中对语言规律的分层调谐。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Jun 3;5(2):528-552. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00145. eCollection 2024.
9
Severe processing capacity limits for sub-lexical features of letter strings.严重的处理能力限制了字母串的亚词汇特征。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Feb;86(2):643-652. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02830-1. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
10
Prestige and content biases together shape the cultural transmission of narratives.声望偏差和内容偏差共同塑造了叙事的文化传播。
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Jul 29;3:e42. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.37. eCollection 2021.