Schierholz Irina, Finke Mareike, Kral Andrej, Büchner Andreas, Rach Stefan, Lenarz Thomas, Dengler Reinhard, Sandmann Pascale
Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all,", Hannover, Germany.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Apr;38(4):2206-2225. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23515. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
There is substantial variability in speech recognition ability across patients with cochlear implants (CIs), auditory brainstem implants (ABIs), and auditory midbrain implants (AMIs). To better understand how this variability is related to central processing differences, the current electroencephalography (EEG) study compared hearing abilities and auditory-cortex activation in patients with electrical stimulation at different sites of the auditory pathway. Three different groups of patients with auditory implants (Hannover Medical School; ABI: n = 6, CI: n = 6; AMI: n = 2) performed a speeded response task and a speech recognition test with auditory, visual, and audio-visual stimuli. Behavioral performance and cortical processing of auditory and audio-visual stimuli were compared between groups. ABI and AMI patients showed prolonged response times on auditory and audio-visual stimuli compared with NH listeners and CI patients. This was confirmed by prolonged N1 latencies and reduced N1 amplitudes in ABI and AMI patients. However, patients with central auditory implants showed a remarkable gain in performance when visual and auditory input was combined, in both speech and non-speech conditions, which was reflected by a strong visual modulation of auditory-cortex activation in these individuals. In sum, the results suggest that the behavioral improvement for audio-visual conditions in central auditory implant patients is based on enhanced audio-visual interactions in the auditory cortex. Their findings may provide important implications for the optimization of electrical stimulation and rehabilitation strategies in patients with central auditory prostheses. Hum Brain Mapp 38:2206-2225, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
人工耳蜗(CI)、听觉脑干植入物(ABI)和听觉中脑植入物(AMI)患者的言语识别能力存在很大差异。为了更好地理解这种差异与中枢处理差异之间的关系,当前的脑电图(EEG)研究比较了在听觉通路不同部位进行电刺激的患者的听力和听觉皮层激活情况。三组不同的听觉植入患者(汉诺威医学院;ABI:n = 6,CI:n = 6;AMI:n = 2)进行了快速反应任务以及针对听觉、视觉和视听刺激的言语识别测试。比较了各组之间听觉和视听刺激的行为表现及皮层处理情况。与正常听力者和CI患者相比,ABI和AMI患者对听觉和视听刺激的反应时间延长。ABI和AMI患者的N1潜伏期延长和N1波幅降低证实了这一点。然而,在言语和非言语条件下,当中枢听觉植入患者的视觉和听觉输入相结合时,其表现有显著提高,这在这些个体的听觉皮层激活的强烈视觉调制中得到体现。总之,结果表明中枢听觉植入患者在视听条件下的行为改善是基于听觉皮层中增强的视听交互作用。他们的发现可能为中枢听觉假体患者的电刺激优化和康复策略提供重要启示。《人类大脑图谱》38:2206 - 2225,2017年。© 2017威利期刊公司