Nowakiewicz Aneta, Ziółkowska Grażyna, Zięba Przemysław, Gnat Sebastian, Trościańczyk Aleksandra, Adaszek Łukasz
Sub-Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Institute of Biological Bases of Animal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences, Lublin, Poland.
State Veterinary Laboratory, Lublin, Poland.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 30;12(1):e0171160. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171160. eCollection 2017.
The aim of this study was to characterize multidrug resistant E. faecalis strains from pigs of local origin and to analyse the relationship between resistance and genotypic and proteomic profiles by amplification of DNA fragments surrounding rare restriction sites (ADSRRS-fingerprinting) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI -TOF MS). From the total pool of Enterococcus spp. isolated from 90 pigs, we selected 36 multidrug resistant E. faecalis strains, which represented three different phenotypic resistance profiles. Phenotypic resistance to tetracycline, macrolides, phenicols, and lincomycin and high-level resistance to aminoglycosides were confirmed by the occurrence of at least one corresponding resistance gene in each strain. Based on the analysis of the genotypic and phenotypic resistance of the strains tested, five distinct resistance profiles were generated. As a complement of this analysis, profiles of virulence genes were determined and these profiles corresponded to the phenotypic resistance profiles. The demonstration of resistance to a wide panel of antimicrobials by the strains tested in this study indicates the need of typing to determine the spread of resistance also at the local level. It seems that in the case of E. faecalis, type and scope of resistance strongly determines the genotypic pattern obtained with the ADSRRS-fingerprinting method. The ADSRRS-fingerprinting analysis showed consistency of the genetic profiles with the resistance profiles, while analysis of data with the use of the MALDI- TOF MS method did not demonstrate direct reproduction of the clustering pattern obtained with this method. Our observations were confirmed by statistical analysis (Simpson's index of diversity, Rand and Wallace coefficients). Even though the MALDI -TOF MS method showed slightly higher discrimination power than ADSRRS-fingerprinting, only the latter method allowed reproduction of the clustering pattern of isolates based on phenotypic resistance and analysis of resistance and virulence genes (Wallace coefficient 1.0). This feature seems to be the most useful for epidemiological purposes and short-term analysis.
本研究的目的是对本地来源猪的耐多药粪肠球菌菌株进行特征分析,并通过扩增稀有限制位点周围的DNA片段(ADSRRS指纹图谱)和基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)分析耐药性与基因型和蛋白质组学图谱之间的关系。从90头猪分离出的肠球菌属菌株总体中,我们选择了36株耐多药粪肠球菌菌株,它们代表三种不同的表型耐药谱。通过各菌株中至少一个相应耐药基因的存在,证实了对四环素、大环内酯类、酚类和林可霉素的表型耐药以及对氨基糖苷类的高水平耐药。基于对所测试菌株的基因型和表型耐药性分析,产生了五种不同的耐药谱。作为该分析的补充,确定了毒力基因谱,这些谱与表型耐药谱相对应。本研究中测试的菌株对多种抗菌药物耐药的证明表明,即使在地方层面也需要进行分型以确定耐药性的传播情况。对于粪肠球菌而言,耐药类型和范围似乎强烈决定了用ADSRRS指纹图谱法获得的基因型模式。ADSRRS指纹图谱分析显示遗传图谱与耐药谱一致,而使用MALDI-TOF MS方法分析数据并未证明能直接重现用该方法获得的聚类模式。我们的观察结果通过统计分析(辛普森多样性指数、兰德系数和华莱士系数)得到证实。尽管MALDI-TOF MS方法显示出比ADSRRS指纹图谱法略高的鉴别力,但只有后者能够根据表型耐药性以及耐药和毒力基因分析重现分离株的聚类模式(华莱士系数为1.0)。这一特性似乎对流行病学目的和短期分析最为有用。