• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强迫服从情境中的印象管理效应

Impression Management Effects in the Forced Compliance Situation.

作者信息

Joseph Joanne M, Gaes Gerald G, Tedeschi James T, Cunningham Michael R

机构信息

a State University of New York at Albany and Macalester College , USA.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 1979 Feb;107(1):89-98. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1979.9922677.

DOI:10.1080/00224545.1979.9922677
PMID:28136207
Abstract

Two forced compliance studies were conducted in which the S's expectations regarding the situational appropriateness of his behavior were manipulated. In the first study (N = 36 female undergraduates) E indicated agreement or disagreement with the S's counterattitudinal essay or else did not give an opinion. Although attitude change occurred in the Agree and No Feedback groups, there was none in the Disagree condition. Three conditions were created in the second study (N = 142 male and female undergraduates): Standard Dissonance, Control, and a Model condition in which a confederate told the E his essay did not reflect his real attitude. Attitude change occurred in both experimental groups, but more occurred in the Dissonance than the Model condition. These results are interpreted in terms of impression management theory.

摘要

进行了两项强迫顺从研究,其中对被试(S)关于其行为情境适宜性的期望进行了操控。在第一项研究中(N = 36名女大学生),主试(E)对被试的反态度文章表示同意或不同意,或者不发表意见。虽然在同意组和无反馈组中出现了态度改变,但在不同意条件下没有。在第二项研究中(N = 142名男女大学生)创建了三个条件:标准失调条件、控制条件和一个榜样条件,在榜样条件下,一名同谋告诉主试他的文章没有反映他的真实态度。两个实验组都出现了态度改变,但在失调条件下比榜样条件下出现的更多。这些结果依据印象管理理论进行了解释。

相似文献

1
Impression Management Effects in the Forced Compliance Situation.强迫服从情境中的印象管理效应
J Soc Psychol. 1979 Feb;107(1):89-98. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1979.9922677.
2
Pills and attitude change: misattribution of arousal or excuses for negative actions?药物与态度改变:是唤醒的错误归因还是消极行为的借口?
J Gen Psychol. 1986 Oct;113(4):309-28. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1986.9711042.
3
Physiological arousal, dissonance, and attitude change: evidence for a dissonance-arousal link and a "don't remind me" effect.生理唤醒、认知失调与态度改变:认知失调与唤醒之间联系及“别提醒我”效应的证据
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Jul;51(1):55-65. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.55.
4
False memories for dissonance inducing events.对引发认知失调事件的错误记忆。
Memory. 2015;23(2):203-12. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.881501. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
5
Arousal as a necessary condition for attitude change following induced compliance.唤醒是诱导依从后态度改变的必要条件。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1978 Oct;36(10):1101-6. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.36.10.1101.
6
Vicarious dissonance: attitude change from the inconsistency of others.替代性失调:因他人的不一致而产生的态度改变。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Jul;85(1):47-62. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.47.
7
Incidental mood state before dissonance induction affects attitude change.诱导认知失调前的偶然情绪状态会影响态度改变。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 14;12(7):e0180531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180531. eCollection 2017.
8
When Social Support Fails: Supporter Characteristics in Compliance-Induced Attitude Change.当社会支持失效时:依从诱导态度改变中的支持者特征
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1988 Mar;14(1):136-144. doi: 10.1177/0146167288141014.
9
Do I Know What I'm Doing? Cognitive Dissonance and Action Identification Theory.我知道自己在做什么吗?认知失调与行动识别理论。
Span J Psychol. 2015 Nov 27;18:E97. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2015.93.
10
Reexploring the connection between terror management theory and dissonance theory.重新探索恐怖管理理论与失调理论之间的联系。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Sep;31(9):1217-25. doi: 10.1177/0146167204274077.