Bopp Rita, Holler-Rickauer Simone, Martin Kevan A C, Schuhknecht Gregor F P
Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zürich and ETH Zürich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland.
Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zürich and ETH Zürich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
J Neurosci. 2017 Mar 1;37(9):2435-2448. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2557-16.2017. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
The traditional classification of primary motor cortex (M1) as an agranular area has been challenged recently when a functional layer 4 (L4) was reported in M1. L4 is the principal target for thalamic input in sensory areas, which raises the question of how thalamocortical synapses formed in M1 in the mouse compare with those in neighboring sensory cortex (S1). We identified thalamic boutons by their immunoreactivity for the vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (VGluT2) and performed unbiased disector counts from electron micrographs. We discovered that the thalamus contributed proportionately only half as many synapses to the local circuitry of L4 in M1 compared with S1. Furthermore, thalamic boutons in M1 targeted spiny dendrites exclusively, whereas ∼9% of synapses were formed with dendrites of smooth neurons in S1. VGluT2 boutons in M1 were smaller and formed fewer synapses per bouton on average (1.3 vs 2.1) than those in S1, but VGluT2 synapses in M1 were larger than in S1 (median postsynaptic density areas of 0.064 μm vs 0.042 μm). In M1 and S1, thalamic synapses formed only a small fraction (12.1% and 17.2%, respectively) of all of the asymmetric synapses in L4. The functional role of the thalamic input to L4 in M1 has largely been neglected, but our data suggest that, as in S1, the thalamic input is amplified by the recurrent excitatory connections of the L4 circuits. The lack of direct thalamic input to inhibitory neurons in M1 may indicate temporal differences in the inhibitory gating in L4 of M1 versus S1. Classical interpretations of the function of primary motor cortex (M1) emphasize its lack of the granular layer 4 (L4) typical of sensory cortices. However, we show here that, like sensory cortex (S1), mouse M1 also has the canonical circuit motif of a core thalamic input to the middle cortical layer and that thalamocortical synapses form a small fraction (M1: 12%; S1: 17%) of all asymmetric synapses in L4 of both areas. Amplification of thalamic input by recurrent local circuits is thus likely to be a significant mechanism in both areas. Unlike M1, where thalamocortical boutons typically form a single synapse, thalamocortical boutons in S1 usually formed multiple synapses, which means they can be identified with high probability in the electron microscope without specific labeling.
传统上,初级运动皮层(M1)被归类为无颗粒区,但最近有报道称M1中存在功能性第4层(L4),这一传统分类受到了挑战。L4是感觉区域丘脑输入的主要靶点,这就引发了一个问题:小鼠M1中形成的丘脑皮质突触与相邻感觉皮层(S1)中的丘脑皮质突触相比如何。我们通过对囊泡谷氨酸转运体2(VGluT2)的免疫反应性来识别丘脑终扣,并从电子显微镜照片中进行无偏倚的 dissector计数。我们发现,与S1相比,丘脑对M1中L4局部回路的突触贡献仅为其一半。此外,M1中的丘脑终扣仅靶向棘状树突,而S1中约9%的突触是与平滑神经元的树突形成的。M1中的VGluT2终扣较小,平均每个终扣形成的突触比S1中的少(1.3个对2.1个),但M1中的VGluT2突触比S1中的大(突触后致密区中位数面积分别为0.064μm和0.042μm)。在M1和S1中,丘脑突触仅占L4中所有不对称突触的一小部分(分别为12.1%和17.2%)。丘脑对M1中L4的输入的功能作用在很大程度上被忽视了,但我们的数据表明,与S1一样,丘脑输入通过L4回路的反复兴奋性连接而被放大。M1中缺乏对抑制性神经元的直接丘脑输入可能表明M1与S1的L4在抑制性门控方面存在时间差异。对初级运动皮层(M1)功能的经典解释强调其缺乏感觉皮层典型的颗粒层4(L4)。然而,我们在此表明,与感觉皮层(S1)一样,小鼠M1也具有丘脑向皮层中层输入的典型回路模式,并且丘脑皮质突触在这两个区域的L4中所有不对称突触中所占比例较小(M1:12%;S1:17%)。因此,局部回路反复对丘脑输入进行放大很可能是这两个区域的一个重要机制。与M1不同,M1中的丘脑皮质终扣通常形成单个突触,而S1中的丘脑皮质终扣通常形成多个突触,这意味着在电子显微镜下无需特定标记就能很容易地识别它们。