Mohd Azman Zairul Azwan, Kim Seon-Hahn
Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea;; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Mar 16;1:5. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2016.03.16. eCollection 2016.
Robotic surgery has the upper hand when compared to the laparoscopic approach in terms of superior visualisation, flexibility in movement, steadiness and accessibility to confined anatomical spaces. Nevertheless, limitations still exist with regards to cost, reduced tactile sensation, time-consuming setup and a significant learning curve to achieve. Although studies have shown better or at least comparable outcomes between the robotic and laparoscopic approach, the limitations mentioned result in poor penetrance among centres and surgeons. Advancements in robotic surgery technology and attaining the acquired skillset will translate into better clinical outcomes for patients.
与腹腔镜手术相比，机器人手术在视觉效果优越、运动灵活性、稳定性以及进入狭窄解剖空间的可及性方面具有优势。然而，在成本、触觉感知降低、设置耗时以及需要显著的学习曲线才能掌握等方面仍存在局限性。尽管研究表明机器人手术和腹腔镜手术的效果更好或至少相当，但上述局限性导致该技术在各中心和外科医生中的普及率较低。机器人手术技术的进步以及获得相关技能将为患者带来更好的临床结果。
