Di Bartolo Paolo, Nicolucci Antonio, Cherubini Valentino, Iafusco Diario, Scardapane Marco, Rossi Maria Chiara
AUSL Diabetes Unit Romagna, Ravenna, Italy.
CORESEARCH - Center for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Via Tiziano Vecellio, 2, 65124, Pescara, Italy.
Acta Diabetol. 2017 Apr;54(4):393-402. doi: 10.1007/s00592-017-0963-4. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
To compare iBGStar™ + DMApp (experimental meter + telemedicine system) (iBGStar) with a traditional glucose meter (Control) in type 1 diabetes adolescents/young adults.
i-NewTrend was a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial involving subjects aged 14-24 years, on basal-bolus insulin, HbA1c ≥ 8.0%, and poorly compliant with SMBG (i.e., <30% of the recommended frequency). Primary end points were change in HbA1c and achievement of compliance with SMBG (≥30% of the recommended frequency) after 6 months. Quality of life was also evaluated. A post-trial observational phase was conducted, where both groups used the experimental device.
Of 182 randomized patients (51.1% male; age 17.7 ± 3.0 years; diabetes duration 8.8 ± 4.7 years; HbA1c levels 10.0% ± 1.4), 92 were allocated to iBGStar and 90 to Control; 6.5% in iBGStar and 8.9% in Control dropped-out. After 6 months, HbA1c changes (±SE) were -0.44% ± 0.13 in iBGStar and -0.32% ± 0.13 in Control (p = 0.51). In the post-trial phase, HbA1c changes from 6 months (±SE) were -0.07% ± 0.14 in iBGStar and -0.31% ± 0.14 in Control (p = 0.24). Compliance end point was reached by 53.6% in iBGStar and 55.0% in Control (p = 0.86). Mean daily SMBG measurements increased from 1.1 to 2.3 in both groups without worsening quality of life. Compliant subjects showed a greater reduction in HbA1c levels (-0.60% ± 0.23 in iBGStar; -0.41% ± 0.21 in Control; p = 0.31). Within iBGStar group, telemedicine users (38.0%) reduced HbA1c by -0.58 ± 0.18.
iBGStar was not superior to the traditional meter. Irrespective of the strategy, increasing from 1 to 2 SMBG tests/day was associated with HbA1c reduction in both groups, without pharmacologic interventions. Identifying new technologies effective and acceptable to patients is an option to improve adherence to diabetes care.
The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number NCT02073188).
在1型糖尿病青少年/青年成人中,比较iBGStar™ + DMApp(实验性血糖仪 + 远程医疗系统)(iBGStar)与传统血糖仪(对照)。
i - NewTrend是一项多中心、开放标签、随机试验,纳入年龄在14 - 24岁、接受基础 - 餐时胰岛素治疗、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)≥8.0%且自我血糖监测(SMBG)依从性差(即低于推荐频率的30%)的受试者。主要终点为6个月后HbA1c的变化以及达到SMBG依从性(≥推荐频率的30%)。还评估了生活质量。进行了试验后观察阶段,两组均使用实验设备。
182例随机分组患者(男性占51.1%;年龄17.7 ± 3.0岁;糖尿病病程8.8 ± 4.7年;HbA1c水平10.0% ± 1.4),92例分配至iBGStar组,90例分配至对照组;iBGStar组6.5%、对照组8.9%退出研究。6个月后,iBGStar组HbA1c变化(±标准误)为 - 0.44% ± 0.13,对照组为 - 0.32% ± 0.13(p = 0.51)。在试验后阶段,iBGStar组自6个月起HbA1c变化(±标准误)为 - 0.07% ± 0.14,对照组为 - 0.31% ± 0.14(p = 0.24)。iBGStar组53.6%、对照组55.0%达到依从性终点(p = 0.86)。两组每日平均SMBG测量次数均从1.1次增加至2.3次,且生活质量未恶化。依从性好的受试者HbA1c水平降低幅度更大(iBGStar组为 - 0.60% ± 0.23;对照组为 - 0.41% ± 0.21;p = 0.31)。在iBGStar组中,远程医疗使用者(38.0%)HbA1c降低了 - 0.58 ± 0.18。
iBGStar并不优于传统血糖仪。无论采用何种策略,两组每日SMBG检测次数从1次增加至2次均与HbA1c降低相关,且无需药物干预。确定对患者有效且可接受的新技术是提高糖尿病治疗依从性的一种选择。
该试验在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(注册号NCT02073188)。