Becker Nina, Kalpouzos Grégoria, Persson Jonas, Laukka Erika J, Brehmer Yvonne
Otto Hahn Group on Associative Memory, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Aging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Mar;29(3):545-559. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01062. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
Evidence from neuroimaging studies suggests a critical role of hippocampus and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) in associative relative to item encoding. Here, we investigated similarities and differences in functional brain correlates for associative and item memory as a function of encoding instruction. Participants received either incidental (animacy judgments) or intentional encoding instructions while fMRI was employed during the encoding of associations and items. In a subsequent recognition task, memory performance of participants receiving intentional encoding instructions was higher compared with those receiving incidental encoding instructions. Furthermore, participants remembered more items than associations, regardless of encoding instruction. Greater brain activation in the left anterior hippocampus was observed for intentionally compared with incidentally encoded associations, although activity in this region was not modulated by the type of instruction for encoded items. Furthermore, greater activity in the left anterior hippocampus and left IFG was observed during intentional associative compared with item encoding. The same regions were related to subsequent memory of intentionally encoded associations and were thus task relevant. Similarly, connectivity of the anterior hippocampus to the right superior temporal lobe and IFG was uniquely linked to subsequent memory of intentionally encoded associations. Our study demonstrates the differential involvement of anterior hippocampus in intentional relative to incidental associative encoding. This finding likely reflects that the intent to remember triggers a specific binding process accomplished by this region.
神经影像学研究的证据表明,相对于项目编码,海马体和额下回(IFG)在联想编码中起关键作用。在此,我们研究了作为编码指令函数的联想记忆和项目记忆在功能性脑关联方面的异同。参与者在进行联想和项目编码时接受了偶然(感知生命判断)或有意编码指令,同时进行功能磁共振成像(fMRI)。在随后的识别任务中,接受有意编码指令的参与者的记忆表现高于接受偶然编码指令的参与者。此外,无论编码指令如何,参与者记住的项目都比联想多。与偶然编码的联想相比,有意编码的联想在左前海马体中观察到更大的脑激活,尽管该区域的活动不受编码项目的指令类型的调节。此外,与项目编码相比,在有意联想编码期间,左前海马体和左额下回观察到更大的活动。相同区域与有意编码联想的后续记忆相关,因此与任务相关。同样,前海马体与右上颞叶和额下回的连接独特地与有意编码联想的后续记忆相关。我们的研究表明,前海马体在有意联想编码相对于偶然联想编码中的不同参与。这一发现可能反映了记忆意图触发了该区域完成的特定绑定过程。