Nelson Miriam E, Hamm Michael W, Hu Frank B, Abrams Steven A, Griffin Timothy S
Sustainability Institute, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH;
Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA.
Adv Nutr. 2016 Nov 15;7(6):1005-1025. doi: 10.3945/an.116.012567. Print 2016 Nov.
To support food security for current and future generations, there is a need to understand the relation between sustainable diets and the health of a population. In recent years, a number of studies have investigated and compared different dietary patterns to better understand which foods and eating patterns have less of an environmental impact while meeting nutritional needs and promoting health. This systematic review (SR) of population-level dietary patterns and food sustainability extends and updates the SR that was conducted by the 2015 US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, an expert committee commissioned by the federal government to inform dietary guidance as it relates to the committee's original conclusions. In the original SR, 15 studies met the criteria for inclusion; since then, an additional 8 studies have been identified and included. The relations between dietary intake patterns and both health and environmental outcomes were compared across studies, with methodologies that included modeling, life cycle assessment, and land use analysis. Across studies, consistent evidence indicated that a dietary pattern higher in plant-based foods (e.g., vegetables, fruits, legumes, seeds, nuts, whole grains) and lower in animal-based foods (especially red meat), as well as lower in total energy, is both healthier and associated with a lesser impact on the environment. This dietary pattern differs from current average consumption patterns in the United States. Our updated SR confirms and strengthens the conclusions of the original US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee SR, which found that adherence to several well-characterized dietary patterns, including vegetarian (with variations) diets, dietary guidelines-related diets, Mediterranean-style diets, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, and other sustainable diet scenarios, promotes greater health and has a less negative impact on the environment than current average dietary intakes.
为保障当代及子孙后代的粮食安全,有必要了解可持续饮食与人群健康之间的关系。近年来,多项研究对不同的饮食模式进行了调查和比较,以更好地了解哪些食物和饮食模式在满足营养需求和促进健康的同时,对环境的影响较小。这项关于人群层面饮食模式与食物可持续性的系统评价(SR)扩展并更新了2015年美国膳食指南咨询委员会进行的系统评价,该咨询委员会是一个由联邦政府委托的专家委员会,旨在为与该委员会原始结论相关的膳食指南提供信息。在最初的系统评价中,有15项研究符合纳入标准;从那时起,又确定并纳入了8项研究。通过建模、生命周期评估和土地利用分析等方法,对各项研究中的饮食摄入模式与健康和环境结果之间的关系进行了比较。在各项研究中,一致的证据表明,以植物性食物(如蔬菜、水果、豆类、种子、坚果、全谷物)为主且动物性食物(尤其是红肉)较少、总能量较低的饮食模式既更健康,又对环境的影响较小。这种饮食模式与美国目前的平均消费模式不同。我们更新后的系统评价证实并强化了美国膳食指南咨询委员会最初系统评价的结论,该结论发现,坚持几种特征明确的饮食模式,包括素食(有不同变体)饮食、与膳食指南相关的饮食、地中海式饮食、防治高血压膳食方法(DASH)饮食以及其他可持续饮食方案,比目前的平均饮食摄入量更有利于健康,且对环境的负面影响更小。