Murali Karumathil M, Mullan Judy, Chen Jenny H C, Roodenrys Steven, Lonergan Maureen
Department of Nephrology, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia.
Graduate School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
BMC Nephrol. 2017 Jan 31;18(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0449-1.
Medication non-adherence is common among renal dialysis patients. High degrees of non-adherence in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can lead to failure to detect a true treatment effect. Cardio-protective pharmacological interventions have shown no consistent benefit in RCTs involving dialysis patients. Whether non-adherence contributes to this lack of efficacy is unknown. We aimed to investigate how medication adherence and drug discontinuation were assessed, reported and addressed in RCTs, evaluating cardiovascular or mortality outcomes in dialysis patients.
Electronic database searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE & Cochrane CENTRAL for RCTs published between 2005-2015, evaluating self-administered medications, in adult dialysis patients, which reported clinical cardiovascular or mortality endpoints, as primary or secondary outcomes. Study characteristics, outcomes, methods of measuring and reporting adherence, and data on study drug discontinuation were analyzed.
Of the 642 RCTs in dialysis patients, 22 trials (12 placebo controlled), which included 19,322 patients, were eligible. The trialed pharmacological interventions included anti-hypertensives, phosphate binders, lipid-lowering therapy, cardio-vascular medications, homocysteine lowering therapy, fish oil and calcimimetics. Medication adherence was reported in five trials with a mean of 81% (range: 65-92%) in the intervention arm and 84.5% (range: 82-87%) in the control arm. All the trials that reported adherence yielded negative study outcomes for the intervention. Study-drug discontinuation was reported in 21 trials (mean 33.2%; 95% CI, 22.0 to 44.5, in intervention and 28.8%; 95% CI, 16.8 to 40.8, in control). Trials with more than 20% study drug discontinuation, more often yielded negative study outcomes (p = 0.018). Non-adherence was included as a contributor to drug discontinuation in some studies, but the causes of discontinuation were not reported consistently between studies, and non-adherence was listed under different categories, thereby potentiating the misclassification of adherence.
Reporting of medication adherence and study-drug discontinuation in RCTs investigating cardiovascular or mortality endpoints in dialysis patients are inconsistent, making it difficult to compare studies and evaluate their impact on outcomes. Recommendations for consistent reporting of non-adherence and causes of drug discontinuation in RCTs will therefore help to assess their impact on clinical outcomes.
药物治疗不依从在肾透析患者中很常见。随机对照试验(RCT)中高度的不依从可能导致无法检测到真正的治疗效果。在涉及透析患者的RCT中,心脏保护药物干预未显示出一致的益处。不依从是否导致了这种疗效缺乏尚不清楚。我们旨在调查在评估透析患者心血管或死亡率结局的RCT中,药物依从性和药物停用是如何评估、报告和处理的。
在MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane CENTRAL中进行电子数据库检索,以查找2005年至2015年发表的RCT,这些试验评估成年透析患者的自我给药药物,并将临床心血管或死亡率终点作为主要或次要结局进行报告。分析了研究特征、结局、测量和报告依从性的方法以及研究药物停用的数据。
在642项透析患者的RCT中,22项试验(12项安慰剂对照)符合条件,共纳入19322名患者。试验的药物干预包括抗高血压药、磷结合剂、降脂治疗、心血管药物、降低同型半胱氨酸治疗、鱼油和拟钙剂。五项试验报告了药物依从性,干预组的平均依从率为81%(范围:65%-92%),对照组为84.5%(范围:82%-87%)。所有报告依从性的试验,干预组均得出阴性研究结果。21项试验报告了研究药物停用情况(干预组平均为33.2%;95%CI,22.0%至44.5%,对照组为28.8%;95%CI,16.8%至40.8%)。研究药物停用率超过20%的试验,更常得出阴性研究结果(p = 0.018)。在一些研究中,不依从被列为药物停用的一个因素,但不同研究之间停用原因的报告不一致,且不依从被列在不同类别下,从而加剧了依从性的错误分类。
在调查透析患者心血管或死亡率终点的RCT中,药物依从性和研究药物停用的报告不一致,这使得难以比较研究并评估它们对结局的影响。因此,关于在RCT中一致报告不依从和药物停用原因的建议将有助于评估它们对临床结局的影响。