• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化患者特征与参与制定和实施治疗计划之间的关系。

Quantifying the relationship between patient characteristics and involvement in developing and implementing a treatment plan.

作者信息

Roy Natalie T, Ulrich Erin E

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical, Biomedical, and Administrative Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Drake University, Des Moines, IA, USA.

出版信息

Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2017 Jan 16;9:1-8. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S107065. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.2147/DHPS.S107065
PMID:28144164
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5248929/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Improving the patient-physician relationship through patient involvement in the care may lead to improved patient safety and better health outcomes. There exists a gap in knowledge in identifying factors that affect self-reported patient involvement in individualized treatment plans. The objectives of this study were to 1) describe patients' perceptions of their involvement in the creation and implementation of their treatment plans and 2) determine if patient involvement varied by medical condition or demographic characteristics.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional analysis of data from the "Quality of Care" module of the 2008 Health and Retirement Study (HRS). The individuals of HRS surveys were older than 50 years. One-way analyses of variance were conducted to determine differences between patient characteristics and involvement in creating a treatment plan. A linear regression was conducted to determine predictors of the summed involvement score.

RESULTS

Average summed scores for each domain (shared decision-making, counseling, and follow-up) and overall involvement scores were ~50%. Linear regression showed that being non-White, older age, and diagnosed with a psychiatric condition or diabetes were predictors of increased self-reported involvement in the development and communication of a patient's treatment plan.

CONCLUSION

Age, race, and having diabetes or a psychiatric condition were the major predictors affecting patient involvement in care, although overall involvement in care was low for all groups.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Patient involvement in care was lower than expected and should be further studied to determine the effects of involvement on health outcomes.

摘要

目的

通过让患者参与护理来改善医患关系,可能会提高患者安全性并带来更好的健康结果。在识别影响患者自我报告参与个性化治疗计划的因素方面,存在知识差距。本研究的目的是:1)描述患者对其参与制定和实施治疗计划的看法;2)确定患者参与度是否因医疗状况或人口统计学特征而异。

方法

本研究是对2008年健康与退休研究(HRS)“护理质量”模块数据的横断面分析。HRS调查的个体年龄超过50岁。进行单因素方差分析以确定患者特征与参与制定治疗计划之间的差异。进行线性回归以确定总参与得分的预测因素。

结果

每个领域(共同决策、咨询和随访)的平均总得分以及总体参与得分约为50%。线性回归表明,非白人、年龄较大以及被诊断患有精神疾病或糖尿病是患者自我报告参与治疗计划制定和沟通增加的预测因素。

结论

年龄、种族以及患有糖尿病或精神疾病是影响患者参与护理的主要预测因素,尽管所有组的总体护理参与度都较低。

实践意义

患者参与护理的程度低于预期,应进一步研究以确定参与对健康结果的影响。

相似文献

1
Quantifying the relationship between patient characteristics and involvement in developing and implementing a treatment plan.量化患者特征与参与制定和实施治疗计划之间的关系。
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2017 Jan 16;9:1-8. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S107065. eCollection 2017.
2
[Does place of residence have an influence on shared decision making for patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice?].[居住地点对全科医疗中2型糖尿病患者的共同决策有影响吗?]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Nov;137-138:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
3
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Association of Actual and Preferred Decision Roles With Patient-Reported Quality of Care: Shared Decision Making in Cancer Care.实际和期望的决策角色与患者报告的护理质量的关联:癌症护理中的共同决策。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):50-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.112.
6
Shared decision-making in older patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer: Determinants of patients' and observers' perceptions.老年结直肠癌或胰腺癌患者的共同决策:患者和观察者感知的决定因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Oct;101(10):1767-1774. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
7
Veterans' decision-making preferences and perceived involvement in care for chronic heart failure.退伍军人对慢性心力衰竭护理的决策偏好及感知参与度
Heart Lung. 2008 Nov-Dec;37(6):440-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
8
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
9
Patient Perceptions Correlate Weakly With Observed Patient Involvement in Decision-making in Orthopaedic Surgery.患者感知与观察到的患者在骨科手术中的决策参与程度相关性较弱。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Sep;476(9):1859-1865. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000365.
10
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Shared Decision Making Among Patients With Hypertension: Results From the RICH LIFE Project.高血压患者共同决策中的种族和民族差异:RICH LIFE项目的结果
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 6;14(9):e036664. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036664. Epub 2025 Apr 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Integrated Chronic Care Management For Patients With Atrial Fibrillation - A Rationale For Redesigning Atrial Fibrillation Care.心房颤动患者的综合慢性病管理——重新设计心房颤动护理的理论依据
J Atr Fibrillation. 2015 Feb 28;7(5):1177. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1177. eCollection 2015 Feb-Mar.
2
Toward Trusting Therapeutic Relationships--In Favor of the Annual Physical.迈向信任治疗关系——支持年度体检
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 15;373(16):1487-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1508270.
3
Chronically ill patients' self-management abilities to maintain overall well-being: what is needed to take the next step in the primary care setting?
慢性病患者维持整体健康的自我管理能力:在初级保健环境中迈出下一步需要什么?
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Sep 15;16:123. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0340-8.
4
Development of a collaborative transitions-of-care program for heart failure patients.为心力衰竭患者制定一项协作式护理过渡计划。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Jul 1;72(13):1147-52. doi: 10.2146/ajhp140563.
5
Confronting the quality paradox: towards new characterisations of 'quality' in contemporary healthcare.直面质量悖论:探寻当代医疗保健中“质量”的新特征
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun 19;15:240. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0851-y.
6
Doctor, what are my options? A prospective cohort study of an individualized care plan for patients with gastrointestinal cancer.医生,我有哪些选择?一项关于胃肠癌患者个性化护理计划的前瞻性队列研究。
Curr Oncol. 2015 Jun;22(3):e171-7. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2194.
7
Incorporating Patient Satisfaction Metrics in Assessing Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Care Quality.将患者满意度指标纳入多学科乳腺癌护理质量评估中。
South Med J. 2015 Jun;108(6):372-6. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000300.
8
The vital blend of clinical competence and compassion: How patients experience person-centred care.临床能力与同情心的重要融合:患者如何体验以患者为中心的护理。
Contemp Nurse. 2016 Apr-Jun;52(2-3):300-12. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2015.1020981. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
9
'Trust my doctor, trust my pancreas': trust as an emergent quality of social practice.“信任我的医生,信任我的胰腺”:信任作为社会实践的一种涌现特质。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2015 Jun 11;10:9. doi: 10.1186/s13010-015-0029-6.
10
Developing patient-centred care: an ethnographic study of patient perceptions and influence on quality improvement.发展以患者为中心的护理:一项关于患者认知及其对质量改进影响的人种志研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 23;15:122. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0770-y.