• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年结直肠癌或胰腺癌患者的共同决策:患者和观察者感知的决定因素。

Shared decision-making in older patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer: Determinants of patients' and observers' perceptions.

机构信息

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Department of Internal Medicine, Nordland Hospital Trust, Bodø, Norway.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Oct;101(10):1767-1774. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2018.06.005
PMID:29933924
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify determinants of older patients' perceptions of involvement in decision-making on colorectal (CRC) or pancreatic cancer (PC) treatment, and to compare these with determinants of observers' perceptions.

METHODS

Patients' perceptions of involvement were constructed by the 9-item SDM questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and a Visual Analogue Scale for Involvement (VAS-I). Observers' perceptions were constructed by the OPTION5, OPTION12, and MAPPIN'SDM. Convergent validities were calculated between the patient-sided and observer instruments using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Linear regression was used to identify determinants per criterion.

RESULTS

58 CRC and 22 PC patients were included (mean age: 71.8 ± 5.2 years, 45.0% female). No significant correlations were found between the patient-sided and observer instruments. Patients' impression of involvement was influenced by patient characteristics such as quality of life and satisfaction, while observers' perceptions mainly referred to encounter characteristics such as the mean duration of consultations and general communication skills.

CONCLUSION

Due to evident differences in determinants, older CRC/PC patients' and observers' perceptions of involvement should both be collected in evaluating the quality of medical decision-making.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

General communication skills should be integrated in SDM training interventions. New SDM measurement tools for patients are needed to sufficiently discriminate between the constructs of involvement and satisfaction.

摘要

目的

确定影响老年患者对结直肠癌(CRC)或胰腺癌(PC)治疗决策参与度看法的因素,并将其与观察者看法的影响因素进行比较。

方法

通过 9 项决策参与度问卷(SDM-Q-9)和参与度视觉模拟量表(VAS-I)构建患者的参与度感知,通过 OPTION5、OPTION12 和 MAPPIN'SDM 构建观察者的参与度感知。采用 Spearman 相关系数计算患者侧和观察者工具之间的收敛有效性。采用线性回归确定每个标准的决定因素。

结果

纳入 58 例 CRC 和 22 例 PC 患者(平均年龄:71.8±5.2 岁,45.0%为女性)。患者侧和观察者工具之间未发现显著相关性。患者对参与度的印象受到患者特征的影响,如生活质量和满意度,而观察者的看法主要涉及就诊特征,如咨询的平均持续时间和一般沟通技巧。

结论

由于决定因素明显不同,在评估医疗决策质量时,应同时收集老年 CRC/PC 患者和观察者对参与度的看法。

实践意义

应将一般沟通技巧纳入 SDM 培训干预中。需要新的患者 SDM 测量工具来充分区分参与度和满意度的结构。

相似文献

1
Shared decision-making in older patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer: Determinants of patients' and observers' perceptions.老年结直肠癌或胰腺癌患者的共同决策:患者和观察者感知的决定因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Oct;101(10):1767-1774. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
2
Patients' and observers' perceptions of involvement differ. Validation study on inter-relating measures for shared decision making.患者和观察者对参与的看法不同。验证研究相互关联的共享决策措施。
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026255. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
3
Observer Ratings of Shared Decision Making Do Not Match Patient Reports: An Observational Study in 5 Family Medicine Practices.观察者对共享决策的评估与患者报告不符:5 家家庭医学实践中的观察性研究。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Jan;41(1):51-59. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20977885.
4
Key elements of optimal treatment decision-making for surgeons and older patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer: A qualitative study.外科医生与老年结直肠癌或胰腺癌患者最佳治疗决策的关键要素:一项定性研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Mar;100(3):473-479. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
5
Validation of the Norwegian version of MAPPIN'SDM, an observation-based instrument to measure shared decision-making in clinical encounters.挪威版MAPPIN'SDM的验证,这是一种基于观察的工具,用于衡量临床诊疗过程中的共同决策。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Mar;100(3):534-541. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.023. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
6
Inconsistencies in patient perceptions and observer ratings of shared decision making: the case of colorectal cancer screening.患者对共同决策的感知与观察者评分的不一致:以结直肠癌筛查为例。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Sep;80(3):358-63. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.034. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
7
Completing the third person's perspective on patients' involvement in medical decision-making: approaching the full picture.完善关于患者参与医疗决策的第三人视角:勾勒全貌。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(4):275-83. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 May 22.
8
Association of Actual and Preferred Decision Roles With Patient-Reported Quality of Care: Shared Decision Making in Cancer Care.实际和期望的决策角色与患者报告的护理质量的关联:癌症护理中的共同决策。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):50-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.112.
9
Exploring doctor and patient views about risk communication and shared decision-making in the consultation.探索医患双方对于会诊中风险沟通和共同决策的看法。
Health Expect. 2003 Sep;6(3):198-207. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00235.x.
10
Investigating a training supporting Shared Decision Making (IT'S SDM 2011): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.调查一项支持共享决策制定的培训(IT'S SDM 2011):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2011 Oct 26;12:232. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-232.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision-Making preferences in advanced cancer patients: associations with sociodemographic and psychological factors.晚期癌症患者的决策偏好:与社会人口学和心理因素的关联
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01806-2.
2
Gender Differences in Self-Advocacy Among Cancer Survivors: How Women and Men Vary in How They Learn to Engage in Decision-Making and Social Support.癌症幸存者自我维权中的性别差异:男性与女性在学习参与决策和社会支持方式上的不同表现
J Cancer Educ. 2024 Nov 2. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02536-4.
3
Shared Decision-Making with Latinx Caregivers During Community Implemented Evidence-Based Practices: Determinants and Associations with Alliance.
在社区实施循证实践过程中与拉丁裔照顾者共同决策:决定因素及与联盟的关联
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2024 Jul 26:1-14. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2024.2372761.
4
Patient Characteristics and the Extent to Which Clinicians Involve Patients in Decision Making: Secondary Analyses of Pooled Data.患者特征及临床医生在决策中让患者参与的程度:汇总数据的二次分析。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Apr;44(3):346-356. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241231721. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
5
Have a vital end-user been overlooked? Developing a shared decision intervention for patients with potential pancreatic cancer regarding the choice of surgery.是否有重要的终端用户被忽视了?为潜在胰腺癌患者就手术选择制定一项共同决策干预措施。
PEC Innov. 2024 Feb 23;4:100269. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100269. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Through the Eyes of Patients: The Effect of Training General Practitioners and Nurses on Perceived Shared Decision-Making Support.从患者的角度看:培训全科医生和护士对感知到的共同决策支持的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jan;44(1):76-88. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231203693. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
7
Real-world use and perceptions of shared decision-making for allergy and asthma care in a US population.美国人群中过敏和哮喘护理共享决策的实际应用与认知
World Allergy Organ J. 2023 Oct 10;16(10):100828. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100828. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Shared decision making for patients with breast and gynecologic malignancies undergoing chemotherapy associated with persistent alopecia.针对接受与持续性脱发相关化疗的乳腺癌和妇科恶性肿瘤患者的共同决策。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Oct 29;44:101095. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101095. eCollection 2022 Dec.
9
Practices and perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on shared decision-making in nephrology.肾病学中患者和医疗保健专业人员共同决策的实践和观点。
BMC Nephrol. 2022 Jul 21;23(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02887-4.
10
How are patient-related characteristics associated with shared decision-making about treatment? A scoping review of quantitative studies.患者相关特征与治疗的共同决策之间有何关联?一项对定量研究的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 24;12(5):e057293. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057293.