Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚式橄榄球季前赛期间训练负荷、体能与伤病之间的关系

Relationship Between Training Load, Fitness, and Injury Over an Australian Rules Football Preseason.

作者信息

Harrison Peter W, Johnston Rich D

机构信息

1Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia; and 2Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Oct;31(10):2686-2693. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001829.

Abstract

Recent research identifies that certain training load (TL) patterns increase the injury risk to athletes. However, physical fitness must also be considered to establish optimal TL patterns. The aim of this study was to identify TL patterns optimal for injury and aerobic fitness by exploring the TL-injury and TL-fitness relationship concurrently over an Australian rules football (ARF) preseason. Individual TL, aerobic fitness, and injury data were collected over a 14-week preseason in 60 subelite ARF players (age = 21.3 ± 2.9 years). Individual TL, assessed through session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), was compared with noncontact, lower limb soft tissue injury to examine the TL-injury relationship. A 2-km time trial was used as the measure of aerobic fitness to examine the optimal TL for aerobic fitness improvement. Aerobic fitness improved by 4.10 ± 2.20% (range = -7.35-19.05%) over the preseason. Training load between 1,600 and 2,000 AU per week was associated with the greatest aerobic fitness improvement (effect size [ES] = 0.47-1.01). Players with preseason TL <1,250 AU per week had the highest injury rate (ES = 0.52-0.62). Large 2-week TL (>4,000 AU, odds ratio [OR] = 2.80) and spikes in weekly TL (15-49%, OR = 3.76) significantly increased injury risk the following week. Performing small amounts of training seems to be the most detrimental to changes in aerobic fitness and injury rate. High TL is not responsible for injuries and is required to maximize improvements in aerobic fitness. However, TL exceeding 2,000 AU over several weeks may attenuate aerobic fitness improvements and increase injury risk. In addition, large increments in weekly TL increase injury risk.

摘要

近期研究表明,某些训练负荷(TL)模式会增加运动员受伤风险。然而,在确定最佳TL模式时还必须考虑身体素质。本研究旨在通过在澳大利亚式橄榄球(ARF)季前赛期间同时探究TL与损伤及TL与体能的关系,确定对损伤和有氧体能而言最佳的TL模式。在为期14周的季前赛中,收集了60名次精英ARF球员(年龄 = 21.3 ± 2.9岁)的个人TL、有氧体能和损伤数据。通过训练课自觉用力程度评分(sRPE)评估的个人TL,与非接触性下肢软组织损伤进行比较,以检验TL与损伤的关系。采用2公里计时赛作为有氧体能的衡量指标,以检验改善有氧体能的最佳TL。在季前赛期间,有氧体能提高了4.10 ± 2.20%(范围 = -7.35 - 19.05%)。每周1600至2000任意单位(AU)的训练负荷与最大的有氧体能改善相关(效应量[ES] = 0.47 - 1.01)。季前赛期间每周TL <1250 AU的球员受伤率最高(ES = 0.52 - 0.62)。连续两周的大训练负荷(>4000 AU,优势比[OR] = 2.80)以及每周训练负荷的激增(15 - 49%,OR = 3.76)会显著增加下一周的受伤风险。进行少量训练似乎对有氧体能变化和受伤率最为不利。高训练负荷并非导致受伤的原因,且是使有氧体能最大化改善所必需的。然而,数周内TL超过2000 AU可能会减弱有氧体能的改善并增加受伤风险。此外,每周训练负荷的大幅增加会增加受伤风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验