Stange Eduard F
Zentrum Innere Medizin I, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Robert Bosch Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany.
Dig Dis. 2017;35(1-2):21-24. doi: 10.1159/000449078. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
In Crohn's disease, the mucus layer appears to be defective in terms of low defensin levels and lack of antibacterial activity. These deficiencies actually explain the Montreal phenotypes and the stable localization of disease in the terminal ileum with low α-defensins from Paneth cells and/or low β-defensins in colonic disease, respectively. Conversely, in ulcerative colitis (UC) the defensin production is normal or even induced, but the mucus layer is thinner and patchy, more in the liquid form and also chemically altered so that antibacterial peptides are not retained and lost into the luminal bacterial bulk. Therefore, both barrier problems allow slow bacterial attachment and invasion, ultimately triggering the massive response of adaptive immunity and tissue destruction. Therefore, leakiness should refer to the antibacterial barrier and not to the general barrier against small molecules, such as mannitol or lactulose, which are not antigenic. The most promising approach in UC seems to be the use of probiotics or the natural compound lecithin as a stabilizer of mucus structure to enhance the barrier. While a phase II study has yielded positive results, the results of the ongoing phase III study are eagerly awaited. It is quite possible that the protective effect of smoking in UC is related to mucus production in the colon also, but this is not an option. Another alternative would be to shift cell differentiation in the colon towards goblet cell; the relevant differentiation factors are known. In Crohn's disease, the direct oral application of defensins might be effective if release and binding to the mucus are achieved. In the experimental colitis model, this works quite well. In conclusion, in a situation where enthusiasm about so-called biologics is declining due to loss of response over time, searching for the primary defects in inflammatory bowel disease and treating them may well be worthwhile, although it is unlikely to provide rapid relief.
在克罗恩病中,黏液层在防御素水平低和缺乏抗菌活性方面似乎存在缺陷。这些缺陷实际上分别解释了蒙特利尔分型以及疾病在回肠末端的稳定定位,即潘氏细胞产生的α-防御素水平低和/或结肠疾病中β-防御素水平低。相反,在溃疡性结肠炎(UC)中,防御素的产生是正常的甚至是增加的,但黏液层更薄且呈片状,更多呈液体形式,并且化学性质也发生了改变,使得抗菌肽无法保留并流失到肠腔细菌群中。因此,这两种屏障问题都使得细菌能够缓慢附着和侵入,最终引发适应性免疫的大量反应和组织破坏。因此,渗漏应指的是抗菌屏障,而不是针对小分子(如甘露醇或乳果糖,它们不是抗原)的一般屏障。UC中最有前景的方法似乎是使用益生菌或天然化合物卵磷脂作为黏液结构的稳定剂来增强屏障。虽然一项II期研究已取得阳性结果,但人们急切期待正在进行的III期研究的结果。吸烟对UC的保护作用很可能也与结肠中的黏液产生有关,但这不是一个可行的选择。另一种选择是使结肠中的细胞分化向杯状细胞转变;相关的分化因子是已知的。在克罗恩病中,如果能够实现防御素的释放并与黏液结合,直接口服防御素可能会有效。在实验性结肠炎模型中,这一方法效果良好。总之,在由于随着时间推移反应丧失而对所谓生物制剂的热情下降的情况下,寻找炎症性肠病的主要缺陷并加以治疗可能是值得的,尽管不太可能迅速缓解症状。