• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CAD/CAM 整体陶瓷和金属陶瓷冠的边缘适合性。

The Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM Monolithic Ceramic and Metal-Ceramic Crowns.

机构信息

Department of Buccofacial Prostheses, Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2019 Mar;28(3):299-304. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12590. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1111/jopr.12590
PMID:28152246
Abstract

PURPOSE

Studies on the marginal fit of monolithic restorations are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the marginal fit among monolithic zirconia, monolithic lithium disilicate, and conventional metal-ceramic crowns and to compare the buccal and lingual surfaces.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty standardized stainless steel master dies were fabricated (height: 5 mm; convergence: 6°; chamfer: 1 mm). The dies were randomly divided into three groups (n = 10 each) according to the material used to construct the crowns: group 1 (LM): Lava Plus; group 2 (DM): IPS e.max CAD; and group 3 (MC): Metal-ceramic. The crowns were luted in a standard manner onto the stainless steel master dies using conventional glass ionomer cement. The vertical marginal gap of the restorations was evaluated under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at 500x magnification. One-way ANOVA, Tukey´s HSD test, and Student's paired t test were used to assess the marginal discrepancy among the groups. The cutoff value for statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.

RESULTS

Significant differences among the three groups (p = 0.0001) were recorded. DM group showed the lowest discrepancies (27.95 ± 9.37 μm). Significant differences were observed for the buccal (p = 0.007) and lingual (p = 0.0001) surfaces between the DM group and the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of fit achieved for the three groups was within the range of clinical acceptance. IPS e.max CAD showed the lowest discrepancies.

摘要

目的

关于整体式修复体边缘适合性的研究有限。本研究旨在评估整体式氧化锆、整体式锂硅玻璃陶瓷和传统金属烤瓷冠的边缘适合性,并比较颊舌面。

材料和方法

制作 30 个标准化不锈钢主模具(高度:5mm;会聚度:6°;倒角:1mm)。根据用于制作冠的材料,将模具随机分为三组(每组 10 个):组 1(LM):Lava Plus;组 2(DM):IPS e.max CAD;组 3(MC):金属烤瓷。用传统玻璃离子水门汀以标准方式将冠粘接到不锈钢主模具上。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)在 500x 放大倍数下评估修复体的垂直边缘间隙。采用单因素方差分析、Tukey HSD 检验和学生配对 t 检验评估组间边缘差异。统计显著性的截止值设为α=0.05。

结果

三组之间存在显著差异(p=0.0001)。DM 组显示出最低的差异(27.95±9.37μm)。DM 组与其他两组之间的颊面(p=0.007)和舌面(p=0.0001)均存在显著差异。

结论

三组的拟合精度在临床可接受范围内。IPS e.max CAD 显示出最低的差异。

相似文献

1
The Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM Monolithic Ceramic and Metal-Ceramic Crowns.CAD/CAM 整体陶瓷和金属陶瓷冠的边缘适合性。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Mar;28(3):299-304. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12590. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
2
Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Fit of a CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Porcelain Laminate Veneer System.CAD/CAM整体式氧化锆增强硅酸锂瓷贴面系统的边缘适合性和内部适合性评估
J Prosthodont. 2022 Jul;31(6):502-511. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13438. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
3
Effect of cementation and aging on the marginal fit of veneered and monolithic zirconia and metal-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns.水门汀粘结和老化对饰面及整体氧化锆和金属陶瓷 CAD-CAM 冠边缘适合性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Feb;125(2):323.e1-323.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.036. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
4
Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.水泥空间对计算机辅助设计与制造(CAD-CAM)制作的整体式氧化锆全冠边缘适合性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Dec;116(6):890-895. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
5
Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations.整体式玻璃陶瓷与双层氧化锆基修复体的抗折裂性能比较。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e259-e264. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12684. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
6
A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.氧化锆与金属烤瓷后牙固定修复体在黏固前后边缘垂直向不调的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Dec;102(6):378-84. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60198-0.
7
Marginal Fit Comparison of CAD/CAM Crowns Milled from Two Different Materials.两种不同材料 CAD/CAM 冠的边缘适合度比较。
J Prosthodont. 2018 Jun;27(5):421-428. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12683. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
8
3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.由数字印模和传统印模制作的压制及CAD/CAM二硅酸锂全冠的三维和二维边缘适合性
J Prosthodont. 2014 Dec;23(8):610-7. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12180. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
9
Evaluation of the marginal fit of monolithic crowns fabricated by direct and indirect digitization.直接和间接数字化制作的整体冠边缘适合性评价。
J Prosthodont Res. 2021 Aug 21;65(3):291-297. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00003. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
10
Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns.CAD-CAM 和热压铸造二硅酸锂瓷冠边缘适合性的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Jan;121(1):124-128. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.035. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of partially crystallized versus fully crystallized lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns.部分结晶与完全结晶的二硅酸锂CAD-CAM全冠边缘和内部间隙的评估。
Odontology. 2025 Apr 12. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01104-6.
2
Comparison of Vertical Marginal Discrepancy in High and Low Translucent Monolithic Zirconia Crowns in Repeated Firing Cycles.反复烧制循环中高透光性和低透光性整体氧化锆全冠垂直边缘差异的比较
Eur J Dent. 2025 Jul;19(3):843-850. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1801303. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
3
The Impact of Open versus Closed Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing Systems on the Marginal Gap of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Single Crowns Evaluated by Scanning Electron Microscopy: A Comparative In Vitro Study.
开放与封闭计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造系统对氧化锆增强硅酸锂单冠边缘间隙的影响:扫描电子显微镜评估的一项体外对照研究
J Funct Biomater. 2024 May 15;15(5):130. doi: 10.3390/jfb15050130.
4
An in vitro study measuring marginal gaps of inlay restorations fabricated from different CAD-CAM materials after thermocycling.一项体外研究测量了经过热循环后由不同 CAD-CAM 材料制成的嵌体修复体的边缘间隙。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Dec 6;23(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03687-4.
5
Digital Evaluation of Trueness and Fitting Accuracy of Co-Cr Crown Copings Fabricated by Different Manufacturing Technologies.不同制造技术制作的钴铬冠内冠真性和贴合精度的数字化评估
Cureus. 2023 Jun 1;15(6):e39819. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39819. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Characterization of the Oral Microbiome in Wearers of Fixed and Removable Implant or Non-Implant-Supported Prostheses in Healthy and Pathological Oral Conditions: A Narrative Review.健康和病理性口腔状况下固定和可摘种植或非种植支持修复体佩戴者口腔微生物群的特征:一项叙述性综述
Microorganisms. 2023 Apr 16;11(4):1041. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11041041.
7
Six-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic CAD-CAM versus metal-ceramic crowns.二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷CAD-CAM全冠与金属陶瓷全冠的六年临床性能
J Adv Prosthodont. 2023 Feb;15(1):44-54. doi: 10.4047/jap.2023.15.1.44. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
8
Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Adhesive Resin Cements Used for Luting Inlay Restorations: An In Vitro Micro-CT Study.用于粘结嵌体修复的粘结树脂水门汀的内部和边缘适应性:一项体外显微CT研究。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Sep 5;15(17):6161. doi: 10.3390/ma15176161.
9
Fixed Prosthetic Restorations and Periodontal Health: A Narrative Review.固定义齿修复与牙周健康:一项叙述性综述
J Funct Biomater. 2022 Feb 1;13(1):15. doi: 10.3390/jfb13010015.
10
Randomized clinical trial comparing monolithic and veneered zirconia three-unit posterior fixed partial dentures in a complete digital flow: three-year follow-up.随机临床试验比较整体氧化锆和饰面氧化锆三单位后牙固定局部义齿在全数字化流程中的应用:三年随访结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jun;26(6):4327-4335. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04396-y. Epub 2022 Feb 10.